Improving Proton-Pump Inhibitor Adherence Intervention Between Primary Care and Community Pharmacies: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S485307
María Puig-Moltó, Blanca Lumbreras, Elsa López-Pintor
{"title":"Improving Proton-Pump Inhibitor Adherence Intervention Between Primary Care and Community Pharmacies: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.","authors":"María Puig-Moltó, Blanca Lumbreras, Elsa López-Pintor","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S485307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy stands as the primary treatment for upper gastrointestinal symptoms, yet poor adherence often results in treatment failure. Given that patients experiencing these symptoms frequently seek assistance at community pharmacies, the development of collaborative tools with primary care is becoming imperative. The objective was to assess the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical intervention, as demonstrated by a collaborative model between primary care and community pharmacies, in enhancing adherence to PPI among patients experiencing upper gastrointestinal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A Pre-post intervention study was carried out in Spanish community pharmacies (June-October 2022). During the baseline visit, patients' sociodemographic and clinical variables were evaluated. Patients were categorized as adherent or non-adherent using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4). In the follow-up visit (14 days later), the impact of the intervention was measured by changes in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale (GIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 351 patients with an active PPI prescription, 178 (50.7%) were non-adherent. Nearly 70% of these patients (122, 68.5%) received an intervention to improve adherence. The overall GIS score improved after the intervention (mean 25.34, SD 5.66 vs mean 27.64, SD 5.63, p < 0.001). All GIS score items showed improvement after the intervention except for the item regarding the taking of additional medication different from that prescribed by the clinician (p = 0.200).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pharmaceutical intervention had a positive impact on patients' symptom relief and overall quality of life, highlighting the significance and efficacy of a collaborative model between primary care and professional pharmaceutical services.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registry: </strong>Clinical Trial Registration (NCT05162079).</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"18 ","pages":"2569-2580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S485307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy stands as the primary treatment for upper gastrointestinal symptoms, yet poor adherence often results in treatment failure. Given that patients experiencing these symptoms frequently seek assistance at community pharmacies, the development of collaborative tools with primary care is becoming imperative. The objective was to assess the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical intervention, as demonstrated by a collaborative model between primary care and community pharmacies, in enhancing adherence to PPI among patients experiencing upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Patients and methods: A Pre-post intervention study was carried out in Spanish community pharmacies (June-October 2022). During the baseline visit, patients' sociodemographic and clinical variables were evaluated. Patients were categorized as adherent or non-adherent using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4). In the follow-up visit (14 days later), the impact of the intervention was measured by changes in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale (GIS).

Results: Of the 351 patients with an active PPI prescription, 178 (50.7%) were non-adherent. Nearly 70% of these patients (122, 68.5%) received an intervention to improve adherence. The overall GIS score improved after the intervention (mean 25.34, SD 5.66 vs mean 27.64, SD 5.63, p < 0.001). All GIS score items showed improvement after the intervention except for the item regarding the taking of additional medication different from that prescribed by the clinician (p = 0.200).

Conclusion: The pharmaceutical intervention had a positive impact on patients' symptom relief and overall quality of life, highlighting the significance and efficacy of a collaborative model between primary care and professional pharmaceutical services.

Clinical trials registry: Clinical Trial Registration (NCT05162079).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信