Lower socioeconomic status is correlated with worse outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Taylor Timoteo, Julio Nerys-Figueroa, Cassandra Keinath, Aghdas Movassaghi, Nicholas Daher, Alexander Jurayj, Jared M Mahylis, Stephanie J Muh
{"title":"Lower socioeconomic status is correlated with worse outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.","authors":"Taylor Timoteo, Julio Nerys-Figueroa, Cassandra Keinath, Aghdas Movassaghi, Nicholas Daher, Alexander Jurayj, Jared M Mahylis, Stephanie J Muh","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05360-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic status has been recognized as a crucial social determinant of health influencing patient outcomes. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a validated measure of an area's socioeconomic status. Limited data exists on the impact of ADI and clinical outcomes and complications following rotator cuff repair (RCR). The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact socioeconomic factors have on outcomes following primary arthroscopic RCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up. Patients who underwent primary rotator cuff repair at a single institution from March 2014 to September 2022 were identified. Patient demographics, pre-and post-operative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, range of motion, complications, and subsequent ipsilateral shoulder surgeries were collected. ADI was collected from an online mapping database using each patient's home address. Patients were split into ADI terciles, with ADI1 representing the least disadvantaged group and ADI3 representing the most disadvantaged group. Analysis of variance and T-test were used for continuous variables, and chi-square analyses were conducted for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 467 patients underwent RCR and had complete demographic data and postoperative follow-ups over a year. There was a significant difference in race, with 78.2% of patients identifying as black in ADI3 and 18.1% in ADI1 (P < .001). Pre-operative PROMIS-Pain Interference, VAS, forward flexion, and abduction were significantly worse in ADI3 compared to ADI1 (P = .001, P < .001, P = .012, and P = .023). At one-year postoperative, patients in ADI3 scored significantly worse than patients in ADI1 in PROMIS- Upper Extremity score (P = .016), PROMIS- Pain Interference (P < .001), VAS (P < .001), forward flexion (P < .001) and abduction (P = .034). Higher ADI scores were associated with a positive correlation for pain (r = .258, P = < 0.001) a negative correlation with upper extremity function (r = - .233, P = .026), a positive correlation with pain interference (r = .355, P < .001), and negative correlation with forward flexion (r = - .227, P < .001). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications (P = .54), retears (P = .47), or reoperations rates (P = .22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower socioeconomic status measured by ADI is associated with worse preoperative and 1-year postoperative pain, shoulder function, and range of motion following RCR. However, no differences were appreciated between cohorts regarding reoperation or complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"865"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05360-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic status has been recognized as a crucial social determinant of health influencing patient outcomes. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a validated measure of an area's socioeconomic status. Limited data exists on the impact of ADI and clinical outcomes and complications following rotator cuff repair (RCR). The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact socioeconomic factors have on outcomes following primary arthroscopic RCR.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up. Patients who underwent primary rotator cuff repair at a single institution from March 2014 to September 2022 were identified. Patient demographics, pre-and post-operative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, range of motion, complications, and subsequent ipsilateral shoulder surgeries were collected. ADI was collected from an online mapping database using each patient's home address. Patients were split into ADI terciles, with ADI1 representing the least disadvantaged group and ADI3 representing the most disadvantaged group. Analysis of variance and T-test were used for continuous variables, and chi-square analyses were conducted for categorical variables.

Results: In total, 467 patients underwent RCR and had complete demographic data and postoperative follow-ups over a year. There was a significant difference in race, with 78.2% of patients identifying as black in ADI3 and 18.1% in ADI1 (P < .001). Pre-operative PROMIS-Pain Interference, VAS, forward flexion, and abduction were significantly worse in ADI3 compared to ADI1 (P = .001, P < .001, P = .012, and P = .023). At one-year postoperative, patients in ADI3 scored significantly worse than patients in ADI1 in PROMIS- Upper Extremity score (P = .016), PROMIS- Pain Interference (P < .001), VAS (P < .001), forward flexion (P < .001) and abduction (P = .034). Higher ADI scores were associated with a positive correlation for pain (r = .258, P = < 0.001) a negative correlation with upper extremity function (r = - .233, P = .026), a positive correlation with pain interference (r = .355, P < .001), and negative correlation with forward flexion (r = - .227, P < .001). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications (P = .54), retears (P = .47), or reoperations rates (P = .22).

Conclusion: Lower socioeconomic status measured by ADI is associated with worse preoperative and 1-year postoperative pain, shoulder function, and range of motion following RCR. However, no differences were appreciated between cohorts regarding reoperation or complications.

Level of evidence iii: Retrospective Cohort Study.

较低的社会经济地位与关节镜下肩袖修复后较差的结果相关。
背景:社会经济地位已被认为是影响患者预后的健康的关键社会决定因素。区域剥夺指数(ADI)是衡量一个地区社会经济地位的有效指标。关于肌腱套修复(RCR)后ADI的影响、临床结果和并发症的数据有限。本研究的目的是探讨社会经济因素对原发性关节镜RCR术后结果的影响。方法:回顾性队列研究,随访1年。确定了2014年3月至2022年9月在同一家机构接受初级肩袖修复的患者。收集患者人口统计数据、术前和术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)评分、活动范围、并发症和随后的同侧肩关节手术。ADI是根据每个病人的家庭住址从一个在线地图数据库中收集的。患者被分为ADI组,ADI1代表最弱势组,ADI3代表最弱势组。对连续变量采用方差分析和t检验,对分类变量采用卡方分析。结果:总共有467例患者接受了RCR,有完整的人口统计资料和术后随访一年多。种族差异显著,78.2%的患者在ADI3中被识别为黑人,而在ADI1中被识别为黑人的比例为18.1% (P结论:由ADI测量的较低的社会经济地位与RCR后术前和术后1年的疼痛、肩功能和活动范围更差相关。然而,在再手术或并发症方面,各组之间没有差异。证据等级iii:回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信