Paul D Chamberlain, Rishabh C Date, Kevin L Shen, Giovanni A Campagna, Linda B Piller, Yvonne I Chu, Christina Y Weng
{"title":"Follow-up Adherence After Teleretinal Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy.","authors":"Paul D Chamberlain, Rishabh C Date, Kevin L Shen, Giovanni A Campagna, Linda B Piller, Yvonne I Chu, Christina Y Weng","doi":"10.1097/IIO.0000000000000540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Determine the follow-up rate for patients referred following an abnormal teleretinal imaging (TRI) screening and examine patient characteristics predictive of follow-up nonadherence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of patients screened between August 2014 and July 2016 in the Harris Health System (HHS) in Houston, TX. All diabetic patients referred for in-person examination, who had data for all study variables, and who did not have established ophthalmic care in the HHS within the previous 2 years were included. Data collected included TRI findings, clinic location, age, race, gender, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), and insulin use. The primary outcome was whether or not a patient attended an in-person follow-up visit. Attendance was the dependent variable in a multivariable logistic regression with the aforementioned exposures used as independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1695 patients included in the study. The follow-up rate (ie, the percentage of patients who went for an in-person examination with an ophthalmologist following a positive screening test and referral) was 54.9%. TRI findings of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) + referable diabetic macular edema (DME) predicted poorer compliance with follow-up recommendations compared to patients with PDR alone (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.99; P=0.046). Age, race, gender, glycemic control, and insulin use did not predict compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age, race, gender, glycemic control, and insulin use were not found to be predictive of follow-up compliance rates; the most severe disease (PDR + DME) predicted noncompliance. Diabetic retinopathy screening programs may consider more aggressive measures in emphasizing compliance in patients with the worst disease as these patients are more likely to miss follow-up appointments. More studies are needed to characterize risk factors for noncompliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14338,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology Clinics","volume":"65 1","pages":"35-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IIO.0000000000000540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Determine the follow-up rate for patients referred following an abnormal teleretinal imaging (TRI) screening and examine patient characteristics predictive of follow-up nonadherence.
Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of patients screened between August 2014 and July 2016 in the Harris Health System (HHS) in Houston, TX. All diabetic patients referred for in-person examination, who had data for all study variables, and who did not have established ophthalmic care in the HHS within the previous 2 years were included. Data collected included TRI findings, clinic location, age, race, gender, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), and insulin use. The primary outcome was whether or not a patient attended an in-person follow-up visit. Attendance was the dependent variable in a multivariable logistic regression with the aforementioned exposures used as independent variables.
Results: There were 1695 patients included in the study. The follow-up rate (ie, the percentage of patients who went for an in-person examination with an ophthalmologist following a positive screening test and referral) was 54.9%. TRI findings of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) + referable diabetic macular edema (DME) predicted poorer compliance with follow-up recommendations compared to patients with PDR alone (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.99; P=0.046). Age, race, gender, glycemic control, and insulin use did not predict compliance.
Conclusion: Age, race, gender, glycemic control, and insulin use were not found to be predictive of follow-up compliance rates; the most severe disease (PDR + DME) predicted noncompliance. Diabetic retinopathy screening programs may consider more aggressive measures in emphasizing compliance in patients with the worst disease as these patients are more likely to miss follow-up appointments. More studies are needed to characterize risk factors for noncompliance.
期刊介绍:
International Ophthalmology Clinics is a valuable resource for any medical professional seeking to stay informed and up-to-date regarding developments in this dynamic specialty. Each issue of this quarterly publication presents a comprehensive review of a single topic in a new or changing area of ophthalmology. The timely, tightly focused review articles found in this publication give ophthalmologists the opportunity to benefit from the knowledge of leading experts in this rapidly changing field.