Risk of infection and conversion time from external to definitive fixation in open tibial fracture.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Wazzan S Aljuhani, Yasir A Alshabi, Abdullah M Alanazi, Meshal A Alothri, Saleh A Almutairi, Ziad A Aljaafri, Abdullah M Alzahrani
{"title":"Risk of infection and conversion time from external to definitive fixation in open tibial fracture.","authors":"Wazzan S Aljuhani, Yasir A Alshabi, Abdullah M Alanazi, Meshal A Alothri, Saleh A Almutairi, Ziad A Aljaafri, Abdullah M Alzahrani","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05350-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An open fracture of the tibia is one of the most common and dangerous type of open fractures. In the management of these injuries, the primary focus is on reducing the infection rate, as this is crucial for achieving the best clinical outcomes. This study aims to explore how provisional external fixation duration influences the rates of infection and union in open tibial shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study with a total of 55 patients who received temporary external fixation. Groups A (less than 12 days), B (12-24), C (25-36), and D (more than 36) were the four groups into which they were split according to the conversion time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12.8%, 18.2%, 50%, and 100% of the infections were found in Groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. Significant (P < 0.05) differences were found throughout the four groups. The conversion time from external to definitive fixation was found to have a relationship with the occurrence of an infection (P = 0.004). A higher prevalence of infection was observed over time. However, no association was observed between infection and antibiotic duration or initial debridement time (P = 0.689 and P = 0.963, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of this study demonstrate that the likelihood of infection increases when the change from external fixation to definitive internal fixation is delayed. Therefore, it is important to convert to definitive internal fixation immediately when the local and general conditions are favorable for doing so.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"867"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05350-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An open fracture of the tibia is one of the most common and dangerous type of open fractures. In the management of these injuries, the primary focus is on reducing the infection rate, as this is crucial for achieving the best clinical outcomes. This study aims to explore how provisional external fixation duration influences the rates of infection and union in open tibial shaft fractures.

Methods: A retrospective study with a total of 55 patients who received temporary external fixation. Groups A (less than 12 days), B (12-24), C (25-36), and D (more than 36) were the four groups into which they were split according to the conversion time.

Results: 12.8%, 18.2%, 50%, and 100% of the infections were found in Groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. Significant (P < 0.05) differences were found throughout the four groups. The conversion time from external to definitive fixation was found to have a relationship with the occurrence of an infection (P = 0.004). A higher prevalence of infection was observed over time. However, no association was observed between infection and antibiotic duration or initial debridement time (P = 0.689 and P = 0.963, respectively).

Conclusions: Results of this study demonstrate that the likelihood of infection increases when the change from external fixation to definitive internal fixation is delayed. Therefore, it is important to convert to definitive internal fixation immediately when the local and general conditions are favorable for doing so.

开放性胫骨骨折的感染风险和从外固定到内固定的转换时间。
背景:胫骨开放性骨折是最常见和危险的开放性骨折类型之一。在这些损伤的管理中,主要的重点是降低感染率,因为这是实现最佳临床结果的关键。本研究旨在探讨临时外固定时间对开放性胫骨干骨折的感染率和愈合率的影响。方法:对55例接受临时外固定的患者进行回顾性研究。A组(小于12天)、B组(12 ~ 24天)、C组(25 ~ 36天)、D组(大于36天)按转化时间分为4组。结果:A、B、C、D组的感染率分别为12.8%、18.2%、50%、100%。结论:本研究的结果表明,当从外固定架到最终内固定架的转变延迟时,感染的可能性增加。因此,当当地和一般条件允许时,立即进行最终内固定是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信