A modelling framework to characterize the impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiota diversity.

IF 12.2 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gut Microbes Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1080/19490976.2024.2442523
Carlos Olivares, Etienne Ruppé, Stéphanie Ferreira, Tanguy Corbel, Antoine Andremont, Jean de Gunzburg, Jeremie Guedj, Charles Burdet
{"title":"A modelling framework to characterize the impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiota diversity.","authors":"Carlos Olivares, Etienne Ruppé, Stéphanie Ferreira, Tanguy Corbel, Antoine Andremont, Jean de Gunzburg, Jeremie Guedj, Charles Burdet","doi":"10.1080/19490976.2024.2442523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metagenomic sequencing deepened our knowledge about the role of the intestinal microbiota in human health, and several studies with various methodologies explored its dynamics during antibiotic treatments. We compared the impact of four widely used antibiotics on the gut bacterial diversity. We used plasma and fecal samples collected during and after treatment from healthy volunteers assigned to a 5-day treatment either by ceftriaxone (1 g every 24 h through IV route), ceftazidime/avibactam (2 g/500 mg every 8 h through IV route), piperacillin/tazobactam (1 g/500 mg every 8 h through IV route) or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h through oral route). Antibiotic concentrations were measured in plasma and feces, and bacterial diversity was assessed by the Shannon index from 16S rRNA gene profiling. The relationship between the evolutions of antibiotic fecal exposure and bacterial diversity was modeled using non-linear mixed effects models. We compared the impact of antibiotics on gut microbiota diversity by simulation, using various reconstructed pharmacodynamic indices. Piperacillin/tazobactam was characterized by the highest impact in terms of intensity of perturbation (maximal [IQR] loss of diversity of 27.3% [1.9; 40.0]), while moxifloxacin had the longest duration of perturbation, with a time to return to 95% of baseline value after the last administration of 13.2 d [8.3; 19.1]. Overall, moxifloxacin exhibited the highest global impact, followed by piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftriaxone. Their AUC between day 0 and day 42 of the change of diversity indices from day 0 were, respectively, -13.2 Shannon unit.day [-20.4; -7.9], -10.9 Shannon unit.day [-20.4; -0.6] and -10.1 Shannon unit.day [-18.3; -4.6]. We conclude that antibiotics alter the intestinal diversity to varying degrees, both within and between antibiotics families. Such studies are needed to help antibiotic stewardship in using the antibiotics with the lowest impact on the intestinal microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":12909,"journal":{"name":"Gut Microbes","volume":"17 1","pages":"2442523"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut Microbes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2024.2442523","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metagenomic sequencing deepened our knowledge about the role of the intestinal microbiota in human health, and several studies with various methodologies explored its dynamics during antibiotic treatments. We compared the impact of four widely used antibiotics on the gut bacterial diversity. We used plasma and fecal samples collected during and after treatment from healthy volunteers assigned to a 5-day treatment either by ceftriaxone (1 g every 24 h through IV route), ceftazidime/avibactam (2 g/500 mg every 8 h through IV route), piperacillin/tazobactam (1 g/500 mg every 8 h through IV route) or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h through oral route). Antibiotic concentrations were measured in plasma and feces, and bacterial diversity was assessed by the Shannon index from 16S rRNA gene profiling. The relationship between the evolutions of antibiotic fecal exposure and bacterial diversity was modeled using non-linear mixed effects models. We compared the impact of antibiotics on gut microbiota diversity by simulation, using various reconstructed pharmacodynamic indices. Piperacillin/tazobactam was characterized by the highest impact in terms of intensity of perturbation (maximal [IQR] loss of diversity of 27.3% [1.9; 40.0]), while moxifloxacin had the longest duration of perturbation, with a time to return to 95% of baseline value after the last administration of 13.2 d [8.3; 19.1]. Overall, moxifloxacin exhibited the highest global impact, followed by piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftriaxone. Their AUC between day 0 and day 42 of the change of diversity indices from day 0 were, respectively, -13.2 Shannon unit.day [-20.4; -7.9], -10.9 Shannon unit.day [-20.4; -0.6] and -10.1 Shannon unit.day [-18.3; -4.6]. We conclude that antibiotics alter the intestinal diversity to varying degrees, both within and between antibiotics families. Such studies are needed to help antibiotic stewardship in using the antibiotics with the lowest impact on the intestinal microbiota.

描述抗生素对肠道微生物群多样性影响的建模框架。
宏基因组测序加深了我们对肠道微生物群在人类健康中的作用的认识,一些采用不同方法的研究探索了抗生素治疗期间肠道微生物群的动态。我们比较了四种广泛使用的抗生素对肠道细菌多样性的影响。我们使用了健康志愿者在治疗期间和治疗后收集的血浆和粪便样本,这些志愿者被分配到5天的治疗中,其中包括头孢曲松(每24小时1 g通过静脉注射)、头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(每8小时2 g/500 mg通过静脉注射)、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(每8小时1 g/500 mg通过静脉注射)或莫西沙星(每24小时400 mg通过口服)。测定血浆和粪便中的抗生素浓度,并通过16S rRNA基因谱的Shannon指数评估细菌多样性。采用非线性混合效应模型模拟抗生素粪便暴露与细菌多样性之间的关系。我们利用各种重建的药效学指标,模拟比较了抗生素对肠道菌群多样性的影响。在扰动强度方面,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的影响最大(最大[IQR]多样性损失27.3% [1.9;40.0]),而莫西沙星的扰动持续时间最长,末次给药后恢复到基线值95%的时间为13.2 d [8.3;19.1]。总体而言,莫西沙星的全球影响最大,其次是哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、头孢他啶/阿维巴坦和头孢曲松。从第0天到第42天的多样性指数变化AUC分别为-13.2 Shannon单位。天(-20.4;-7.9], -10.9香农单位。天(-20.4;-0.6]和-10.1香农单位。天(-18.3;-4.6]。我们得出结论,抗生素在不同程度上改变了肠道多样性,无论是在抗生素家族内部还是在抗生素家族之间。需要这样的研究来帮助抗生素管理人员使用对肠道微生物群影响最小的抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gut Microbes
Gut Microbes Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The intestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in human physiology, influencing various aspects of health and disease such as nutrition, obesity, brain function, allergic responses, immunity, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, cancer development, cardiac disease, liver disease, and more. Gut Microbes serves as a platform for showcasing and discussing state-of-the-art research related to the microorganisms present in the intestine. The journal emphasizes mechanistic and cause-and-effect studies. Additionally, it has a counterpart, Gut Microbes Reports, which places a greater focus on emerging topics and comparative and incremental studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信