Neonatal outcomes between trial of labor and cesarean delivery for extreme preterm infants.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Itamar Gilboa, Daniel Gabbai, Yariv Yogev, Emmanuel Attali, Noa Zaltz, Jacky Herzlich, Liran Hiersch, Michael Lavie
{"title":"Neonatal outcomes between trial of labor and cesarean delivery for extreme preterm infants.","authors":"Itamar Gilboa, Daniel Gabbai, Yariv Yogev, Emmanuel Attali, Noa Zaltz, Jacky Herzlich, Liran Hiersch, Michael Lavie","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare adverse neonatal outcomes between trial of vaginal delivery and upfront cesarean delivery for singleton infants born at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study that was conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2022, involving singleton pregnancies delivered between 24<sup>0/7</sup> and 27<sup>6/7</sup> weeks of gestation. Participants were divided into two groups based on their intended mode of delivery: a trial of labor (TOL) group and an upfront cesarean delivery (CD) group. The primary outcome was defined as neonatal death. The secondary outcome was defined as any of the following: intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal sepsis, periventricular leukomalacia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, umbilical cord arterial PH <7.1, or use of postpartum mechanical ventilation. Analyses were performed using an intention-to-treat approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 199 patients were enrolled, with 64 in the TOL group and 135 in the upfront CD group. Neonatal deaths occurred in 48 cases (24.2%) across the entire cohort, with no significant difference between the TOL (18.8%) and upfront CD (26.7%) groups (P = 0.223). Rates of other composite adverse outcome were comparable between the groups (26.6% vs. 31.9%, P = 0.448), respectively. A sub-analysis comparing patients with pre-existing contraindications for vaginal delivery, without maternal or fetal indications for delivery, to those in the TOL group who experienced spontaneous onset of labor showed no differences in primary or secondary outcomes between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no difference in adverse neonatal outcomes between TOL and upfront CD for singletons born at 24-28 weeks gestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare adverse neonatal outcomes between trial of vaginal delivery and upfront cesarean delivery for singleton infants born at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that was conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2022, involving singleton pregnancies delivered between 240/7 and 276/7 weeks of gestation. Participants were divided into two groups based on their intended mode of delivery: a trial of labor (TOL) group and an upfront cesarean delivery (CD) group. The primary outcome was defined as neonatal death. The secondary outcome was defined as any of the following: intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal sepsis, periventricular leukomalacia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, umbilical cord arterial PH <7.1, or use of postpartum mechanical ventilation. Analyses were performed using an intention-to-treat approach.

Results: Overall, 199 patients were enrolled, with 64 in the TOL group and 135 in the upfront CD group. Neonatal deaths occurred in 48 cases (24.2%) across the entire cohort, with no significant difference between the TOL (18.8%) and upfront CD (26.7%) groups (P = 0.223). Rates of other composite adverse outcome were comparable between the groups (26.6% vs. 31.9%, P = 0.448), respectively. A sub-analysis comparing patients with pre-existing contraindications for vaginal delivery, without maternal or fetal indications for delivery, to those in the TOL group who experienced spontaneous onset of labor showed no differences in primary or secondary outcomes between the groups.

Conclusion: We found no difference in adverse neonatal outcomes between TOL and upfront CD for singletons born at 24-28 weeks gestation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信