Facial pressure beneath a cavesson noseband adjusted to different tightness levels during standing and chewing.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Hilary M Clayton, Rachel Murray, Jane M Williams, Vicki Walker, Mark Fisher, Diane Fisher, Jane Nixon, Russell Mackechnie-Guire
{"title":"Facial pressure beneath a cavesson noseband adjusted to different tightness levels during standing and chewing.","authors":"Hilary M Clayton, Rachel Murray, Jane M Williams, Vicki Walker, Mark Fisher, Diane Fisher, Jane Nixon, Russell Mackechnie-Guire","doi":"10.1111/evj.14451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noseband adjustment should avoid discomfort and allow some jaw movement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine pressure beneath a cavesson noseband at five tightness levels during standing and chewing. It was hypothesised that increased noseband tightness is associated with increases in nasal and mandibular pressures while standing and chewing, accompanied by increases in eye temperature and blink rate.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight highly-trained dressage horses wore a snaffle bridle with their own bit. Pressure mats over the nasal bones and beneath the mandibular rami recorded sub-noseband pressures (50 Hz) for five tightness levels (2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0.0 finger-equivalents from loosest to tightest) measured using a taper gauge during quiet standing and chewing a treat. Eye temperature and blink rate were recorded synchronously. Data were analysed using Friedmans two-way ANOVA with Wilcoxon post hoc tests and Bonferroni adjustment for repeated measures. Significance level p ≤ 0.01.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During standing, total force increased from (mean ± SD) 5.8 ± 4.4 N (nasal) and 12.3 ± 8.2 N (mandibular) at 2.0 finger-equivalents to 45.1 ± 24.9 N (nasal) and 70.7 ± 25.7 N (mandibular) at 0.0-finger-equivalents. Forces and pressures were higher on the mandibles than nasal bones although differences did not always reach statistical significance. Horses willingly ingested and chewed a treat at all noseband tightness levels generating forces ~100 N and pressure >40 kPa without increases in eye temperature or blink rate that would suggest discomfort. Post hoc tests indicated significantly higher pressure for 0.0 finger-equivalents than 2.0 finger-equivalents (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Small sample size. Nosebands always tested from loosest to tightest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mandibular pressure exceeded nasal pressure and values at both sites increased with noseband tightness. Horses accepted high noseband pressures when chewing a treat with a cavesson adjusted from 0.0 to 2.0 finger-equivalents. Blink rate and eye temperature suggest horses were not distressed when chewing at 2.0 to 0.0 finger-equivalents tightness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Noseband adjustment should avoid discomfort and allow some jaw movement.

Objectives: To determine pressure beneath a cavesson noseband at five tightness levels during standing and chewing. It was hypothesised that increased noseband tightness is associated with increases in nasal and mandibular pressures while standing and chewing, accompanied by increases in eye temperature and blink rate.

Study design: Experimental.

Methods: Eight highly-trained dressage horses wore a snaffle bridle with their own bit. Pressure mats over the nasal bones and beneath the mandibular rami recorded sub-noseband pressures (50 Hz) for five tightness levels (2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0.0 finger-equivalents from loosest to tightest) measured using a taper gauge during quiet standing and chewing a treat. Eye temperature and blink rate were recorded synchronously. Data were analysed using Friedmans two-way ANOVA with Wilcoxon post hoc tests and Bonferroni adjustment for repeated measures. Significance level p ≤ 0.01.

Results: During standing, total force increased from (mean ± SD) 5.8 ± 4.4 N (nasal) and 12.3 ± 8.2 N (mandibular) at 2.0 finger-equivalents to 45.1 ± 24.9 N (nasal) and 70.7 ± 25.7 N (mandibular) at 0.0-finger-equivalents. Forces and pressures were higher on the mandibles than nasal bones although differences did not always reach statistical significance. Horses willingly ingested and chewed a treat at all noseband tightness levels generating forces ~100 N and pressure >40 kPa without increases in eye temperature or blink rate that would suggest discomfort. Post hoc tests indicated significantly higher pressure for 0.0 finger-equivalents than 2.0 finger-equivalents (p < 0.01).

Main limitations: Small sample size. Nosebands always tested from loosest to tightest.

Conclusions: Mandibular pressure exceeded nasal pressure and values at both sites increased with noseband tightness. Horses accepted high noseband pressures when chewing a treat with a cavesson adjusted from 0.0 to 2.0 finger-equivalents. Blink rate and eye temperature suggest horses were not distressed when chewing at 2.0 to 0.0 finger-equivalents tightness.

站立和咀嚼时,可调整不同紧度的鼻带下的面部压力。
背景:鼻带调整应避免不适,并允许下颌活动。目的:确定在站立和咀嚼时,在五个紧度水平下的cavesson鼻带下的压力。据推测,鼻带紧度的增加与站立和咀嚼时鼻腔和下颌压力的增加有关,同时伴随着眼睛温度和眨眼频率的增加。研究设计:实验性。方法:八匹训练有素的盛装舞步马匹戴上自己的马嚼子。在安静站立和咀嚼食物时,使用锥度计测量鼻骨和下颌支下方的压力垫(50 Hz),记录五个紧度水平(从最松到最紧的2.0,1.5,1.0,0.5,0.0指当量)下的鼻带压力。同时记录眼球温度和眨眼频率。数据分析采用弗里德曼双因素方差分析、Wilcoxon事后检验和重复测量的Bonferroni调整。显著性水平p≤0.01。结果:站立时,总力从(mean±SD) 5.8±4.4 N(鼻)和12.3±8.2 N(下颌)在2.0指当量时增加到45.1±24.9 N(鼻)和70.7±25.7 N(下颌)在0.0指当量时。下颌骨的受力和压力高于鼻骨,尽管差异并不总是达到统计学意义。马愿意在所有鼻带紧度水平下摄入和咀嚼食物,产生约100牛顿的力和40千帕的压力,而眼睛温度或眨眼频率没有增加,这表明不舒服。事后测试表明,0.0指当量的压力明显高于2.0指当量的压力(p)。鼻带总是从最松的到最紧的。结论:下颌骨压力大于鼻压力,且随鼻带紧度增高,下颌骨压力大于鼻压力。马在咀嚼食物时接受了高鼻带压力,咀嚼的幅度从0.0到2.0指当量调整。眨眼频率和眼温表明,当马咀嚼的强度为2.0到0.0指当量时,它们并不感到痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信