Individual application patterns of Cannabis-based Medicines in Germany - Descriptive evaluation of a patient survey and discussion from a forensic perspective.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Marica Hundertmark, André Ihlenfeld, Assaf Landschaft, Jörg Röhrich, Tanja Germerott, Cora Wunder
{"title":"Individual application patterns of Cannabis-based Medicines in Germany - Descriptive evaluation of a patient survey and discussion from a forensic perspective.","authors":"Marica Hundertmark, André Ihlenfeld, Assaf Landschaft, Jörg Röhrich, Tanja Germerott, Cora Wunder","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of countries have legalised cannabis for medicinal purposes in recent years leading to tensions with other regulatory frameworks. Some countries grant a medical defence according to their drug driving legislations. This may lead to specific medico-legal assessments relating to the participation of cannabis patients in road traffic. In Germany, these enquiries for expert opinions are opposed by incomplete statistics on medicinal cannabis patients, which limits the assessment of individual cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, anonymous patient survey was carried out nationwide in the first quarter of 2022 using an online questionnaire. The overall collective (n = 1030) was analysed with regard to application patterns of cannabis-based medicines. In particular, a detailed evaluation of the cannabis flower sub-collective was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Taking into account patients with health insurance prescription and, for the first time, self-payers, a high proportion of cannabis flower patients was observed (89.9 %). On average, the intake of cannabis flowers is associated with substantially higher daily THC doses (336 mg) compared to the usage of other cannabis-based medicines (≤ 17 mg). In addition, 16.2 % of patients reported complex usage patterns consisting of combinations of different types of cannabis-based medicines. Over a quarter (28.4 %) of respondents stated a smoking intake of cannabis flowers which is not recommended from a medicinal point of view.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Descriptive information on individual application patterns of cannabis-based medicines provide a valuable source of information for medico-legal expert statements as well as a basis for further research projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"367 ","pages":"112352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of countries have legalised cannabis for medicinal purposes in recent years leading to tensions with other regulatory frameworks. Some countries grant a medical defence according to their drug driving legislations. This may lead to specific medico-legal assessments relating to the participation of cannabis patients in road traffic. In Germany, these enquiries for expert opinions are opposed by incomplete statistics on medicinal cannabis patients, which limits the assessment of individual cases.

Methods: A cross-sectional, anonymous patient survey was carried out nationwide in the first quarter of 2022 using an online questionnaire. The overall collective (n = 1030) was analysed with regard to application patterns of cannabis-based medicines. In particular, a detailed evaluation of the cannabis flower sub-collective was carried out.

Results: Taking into account patients with health insurance prescription and, for the first time, self-payers, a high proportion of cannabis flower patients was observed (89.9 %). On average, the intake of cannabis flowers is associated with substantially higher daily THC doses (336 mg) compared to the usage of other cannabis-based medicines (≤ 17 mg). In addition, 16.2 % of patients reported complex usage patterns consisting of combinations of different types of cannabis-based medicines. Over a quarter (28.4 %) of respondents stated a smoking intake of cannabis flowers which is not recommended from a medicinal point of view.

Conclusions: Descriptive information on individual application patterns of cannabis-based medicines provide a valuable source of information for medico-legal expert statements as well as a basis for further research projects.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信