Advancing user-centric design and technology adoption for aging populations: a multifaceted approach.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469815
Andreea Stamate, Mircea-Dan Marzan, Magdalena Velciu, Cosmina Paul, Luiza Spiru
{"title":"Advancing user-centric design and technology adoption for aging populations: a multifaceted approach.","authors":"Andreea Stamate, Mircea-Dan Marzan, Magdalena Velciu, Cosmina Paul, Luiza Spiru","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global demographic shift toward an aging population necessitates a nuanced approach to developing and adopting assistive technologies tailored for older adults. This paper synthesizes key challenges, strategies, and recommendations identified in addressing the complex landscape of technology adoption and usage among aging populations. User-centric design and co-creation initiatives are vital for developing assistive technologies that meet the needs of older adults. These initiatives involve engaging older adults in activities like workshops, focus groups, and design sessions to gather feedback and refine technology solutions, ensuring they are accessible, intuitive, and effective. Challenges such as participant selection, cultural attitudes, and trust-building mechanisms are paramount in ensuring meaningful user involvement in technology development processes. Accurate assessment of older adults' technological literacy is identified as critical for designing and implementing digital solutions. The unreliability of self-reported proficiency necessitates objective measures in assessments to counter potential biases and ensure accurate insights into user capabilities. The fragmented digital ecosystem and resulting digital divide among older adults pose significant barriers to technology adoption and usage. The role of caregivers in technology acceptance highlights the need for integrated models that encompass the caregiver perspective, reducing adoption barriers and fostering meaningful engagement with assistive technologies. Interdisciplinary collaboration and robust research standards are essential in advancing technology adoption and addressing societal inequalities. Prioritizing user-centric design, integrating caregivers into technology adoption models, and fostering collaborative efforts across disciplines can significantly improve technology acceptance and enhance the quality of life for older adults in an increasingly digital era.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1469815"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global demographic shift toward an aging population necessitates a nuanced approach to developing and adopting assistive technologies tailored for older adults. This paper synthesizes key challenges, strategies, and recommendations identified in addressing the complex landscape of technology adoption and usage among aging populations. User-centric design and co-creation initiatives are vital for developing assistive technologies that meet the needs of older adults. These initiatives involve engaging older adults in activities like workshops, focus groups, and design sessions to gather feedback and refine technology solutions, ensuring they are accessible, intuitive, and effective. Challenges such as participant selection, cultural attitudes, and trust-building mechanisms are paramount in ensuring meaningful user involvement in technology development processes. Accurate assessment of older adults' technological literacy is identified as critical for designing and implementing digital solutions. The unreliability of self-reported proficiency necessitates objective measures in assessments to counter potential biases and ensure accurate insights into user capabilities. The fragmented digital ecosystem and resulting digital divide among older adults pose significant barriers to technology adoption and usage. The role of caregivers in technology acceptance highlights the need for integrated models that encompass the caregiver perspective, reducing adoption barriers and fostering meaningful engagement with assistive technologies. Interdisciplinary collaboration and robust research standards are essential in advancing technology adoption and addressing societal inequalities. Prioritizing user-centric design, integrating caregivers into technology adoption models, and fostering collaborative efforts across disciplines can significantly improve technology acceptance and enhance the quality of life for older adults in an increasingly digital era.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信