APOLLO Summary on Pulmonary Vascular Disease Fellowship Training.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.044
Kristina Kudelko, Yon K Sung, Corey E Ventetuolo, Steven Kawut, Jeremy A Mazurek, Dana McGlothlin, Tim Lahm, Aaron Waxman, Roham Zamanian
{"title":"APOLLO Summary on Pulmonary Vascular Disease Fellowship Training.","authors":"Kristina Kudelko, Yon K Sung, Corey E Ventetuolo, Steven Kawut, Jeremy A Mazurek, Dana McGlothlin, Tim Lahm, Aaron Waxman, Roham Zamanian","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary vascular disease (PVD), and in particular, pulmonary hypertension (PH), is a highly specialized area of medicine comprised of complex diagnostics, classification systems, risk assessment tools, and therapeutics, the correct application of which has been shown to impact patient outcomes. The PVD scientific and patient community recognizes the importance of standardization of care patterns and has thus implemented a clinical accreditation process for PH care centers across the United States. However, a similar standardization system is lacking in PVD sub-specialty provider training. Non-Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) PVD advanced fellowships exist nationally, but do not provide a unified approach to trainee education. Therefore, first, a survey of all Pulmonary Hypertension Association (PHA)-accredited center directors across the U.S. was performed to gauge interest in a standardized educational initiative in the field of PVD. Second, a NAtional Consortium on PulmOnary VascuLar Disease FeLOwship Training (APOLLO) was founded to establish a common curriculum and set of training requirements across U.S. PVD programs. A particular emphasis was placed on the training requirements for provider competency in PH, because 1) reliable access to PH patients could be supported by all consortium institutions and 2) the consortium members felt that national PH training curriculums lacked standardization and detail. This article provides the results of the national survey, a guideline summary of the fellowship curriculum and training requirements, and a discussion of the impact of the consortium on PVD training and on the PVD subspecialty as a potential emerging formal discipline in internal medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulmonary vascular disease (PVD), and in particular, pulmonary hypertension (PH), is a highly specialized area of medicine comprised of complex diagnostics, classification systems, risk assessment tools, and therapeutics, the correct application of which has been shown to impact patient outcomes. The PVD scientific and patient community recognizes the importance of standardization of care patterns and has thus implemented a clinical accreditation process for PH care centers across the United States. However, a similar standardization system is lacking in PVD sub-specialty provider training. Non-Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) PVD advanced fellowships exist nationally, but do not provide a unified approach to trainee education. Therefore, first, a survey of all Pulmonary Hypertension Association (PHA)-accredited center directors across the U.S. was performed to gauge interest in a standardized educational initiative in the field of PVD. Second, a NAtional Consortium on PulmOnary VascuLar Disease FeLOwship Training (APOLLO) was founded to establish a common curriculum and set of training requirements across U.S. PVD programs. A particular emphasis was placed on the training requirements for provider competency in PH, because 1) reliable access to PH patients could be supported by all consortium institutions and 2) the consortium members felt that national PH training curriculums lacked standardization and detail. This article provides the results of the national survey, a guideline summary of the fellowship curriculum and training requirements, and a discussion of the impact of the consortium on PVD training and on the PVD subspecialty as a potential emerging formal discipline in internal medicine.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信