Medicare Advantage Population in the United States: Outcomes of Patients with Asthma Treated with ICS/LABA Before and After Initiation with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI)

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Alan P. Baptist, Guillaume Germain, Jacob Klimek, François Laliberté, Robert C. Schell, Sergio Forero-Schwanhaeuser, Alison Moore, Stephen G. Noorduyn, Rosirene Paczkowski
{"title":"Medicare Advantage Population in the United States: Outcomes of Patients with Asthma Treated with ICS/LABA Before and After Initiation with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI)","authors":"Alan P. Baptist,&nbsp;Guillaume Germain,&nbsp;Jacob Klimek,&nbsp;François Laliberté,&nbsp;Robert C. Schell,&nbsp;Sergio Forero-Schwanhaeuser,&nbsp;Alison Moore,&nbsp;Stephen G. Noorduyn,&nbsp;Rosirene Paczkowski","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03083-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The clinical benefits of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) have been demonstrated in clinical trials. There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness and economic outcomes associated with FF/UMEC/VI use in US clinical practice. This real-world study assessed asthma-related exacerbations, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs among a Medicare Advantage-insured population before and after initiation of FF/UMEC/VI in patients with asthma previously treated with an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist (ICS/LABA).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>De-identified data were obtained from the Komodo Health database (01/01/2016–12/31/2023) for adults with asthma who received prior ICS/LABA treatment and had ≥ 12 months of continuous Medicare Advantage coverage both pre- and post-FF/UMEC/VI initiation (index date). Rates of asthma-related exacerbations and HRU were compared using rate ratios (RR) from Poisson regressions. Healthcare costs were calculated per patient per year (PPPY) and compared using mean cost differences from generalized linear models.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 2598 Medicare Advantage-insured patients who initiated FF/UMEC/VI for asthma were included. The mean ± SD age was 67.9 ± 12.3 years; 75.5% were female. The rate of overall asthma-related exacerbations was 31% lower in the post- versus pre-initiation period (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.65, 0.73; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and included a 24% lower rate of inpatient/emergency department (IP/ED)-defined exacerbations (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68, 0.85; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and a 34% lower rate of systemic corticosteroid (SCS)-defined exacerbations (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.61, 0.71; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Asthma-related ED visits (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.60, 0.80; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and asthma-related outpatient (OP) visits (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71, 0.84; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were both lower, and the mean reduction in cost was $411 PPPY (95% CI $575, $248; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), after FF/UMEC/VI initiation.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Initiation of FF/UMEC/VI after ICS/LABA treatment among Medicare Advantage-insured patients with asthma was associated with reduced rates of asthma-related exacerbations, ED and OP visits, and healthcare costs, highlighting the benefits of therapy escalation among this patient population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 2","pages":"1061 - 1074"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-024-03083-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03083-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The clinical benefits of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) have been demonstrated in clinical trials. There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness and economic outcomes associated with FF/UMEC/VI use in US clinical practice. This real-world study assessed asthma-related exacerbations, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs among a Medicare Advantage-insured population before and after initiation of FF/UMEC/VI in patients with asthma previously treated with an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA).

Methods

De-identified data were obtained from the Komodo Health database (01/01/2016–12/31/2023) for adults with asthma who received prior ICS/LABA treatment and had ≥ 12 months of continuous Medicare Advantage coverage both pre- and post-FF/UMEC/VI initiation (index date). Rates of asthma-related exacerbations and HRU were compared using rate ratios (RR) from Poisson regressions. Healthcare costs were calculated per patient per year (PPPY) and compared using mean cost differences from generalized linear models.

Results

In total, 2598 Medicare Advantage-insured patients who initiated FF/UMEC/VI for asthma were included. The mean ± SD age was 67.9 ± 12.3 years; 75.5% were female. The rate of overall asthma-related exacerbations was 31% lower in the post- versus pre-initiation period (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.65, 0.73; p < 0.001) and included a 24% lower rate of inpatient/emergency department (IP/ED)-defined exacerbations (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68, 0.85; p < 0.001) and a 34% lower rate of systemic corticosteroid (SCS)-defined exacerbations (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.61, 0.71; p < 0.001). Asthma-related ED visits (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.60, 0.80; p < 0.001) and asthma-related outpatient (OP) visits (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71, 0.84; p < 0.001) were both lower, and the mean reduction in cost was $411 PPPY (95% CI $575, $248; p < 0.001), after FF/UMEC/VI initiation.

Conclusions

Initiation of FF/UMEC/VI after ICS/LABA treatment among Medicare Advantage-insured patients with asthma was associated with reduced rates of asthma-related exacerbations, ED and OP visits, and healthcare costs, highlighting the benefits of therapy escalation among this patient population.

美国医疗保险优势人群:使用ICS/LABA治疗的哮喘患者在开始使用糠酸氟替卡松/乌莫列地铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)前后的结果
摘要:糠酸氟替卡松/乌莫利维坦/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)的临床益处已在临床试验中得到证实。在美国临床实践中,关于FF/UMEC/VI使用的有效性和经济结果的证据有限。这项现实世界的研究评估了在医疗保险优势保险人群中,先前接受吸入皮质类固醇/长效β2激动剂(ICS/LABA)治疗的哮喘患者在开始FF/UMEC/VI治疗前后的哮喘相关恶化、医疗资源利用率(HRU)和医疗成本。方法:从Komodo Health数据库(2016年1月1日- 2023年12月31日)中获得既往接受ICS/LABA治疗且在ff /UMEC/VI开始之前和之后(索引日期)持续医疗保险优惠覆盖≥12个月的成人哮喘患者的去识别数据。使用泊松回归的比率比(RR)比较哮喘相关恶化率和HRU。计算每位患者每年的医疗成本(PPPY),并使用广义线性模型的平均成本差异进行比较。结果:共纳入2598例因哮喘而启动FF/UMEC/VI的Medicare advantage参保患者。平均±SD年龄为67.9±12.3岁;75.5%为女性。与开始治疗前相比,开始治疗后哮喘相关恶化的总体发生率降低了31% (RR 0.69;95% ci 0.65, 0.73;结论:在医疗保险优势保险的哮喘患者中,在ICS/LABA治疗后开始FF/UMEC/VI与哮喘相关恶化率、ED和OP就诊率以及医疗保健费用的降低有关,突出了治疗升级对该患者群体的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信