Policies on Pulmonary Screening and Management of Respiratory Conditions in Military Pilots.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Erik Frijters, Karsten Lindgaard, Dara Regn, Gary Gray, Jon Naylor, Alaistair Bushby, Norbert Guettler, Tuomo Leino
{"title":"Policies on Pulmonary Screening and Management of Respiratory Conditions in Military Pilots.","authors":"Erik Frijters, Karsten Lindgaard, Dara Regn, Gary Gray, Jon Naylor, Alaistair Bushby, Norbert Guettler, Tuomo Leino","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6471.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military pilots are subjected to unique pulmonary demands, particularly in high performance jets. The hypobaric environment necessitates use of on-board oxygen, breathing masks, and regulators to increase oxygen pressure, affecting ventilation and breathing responses. Safety features like pilot flight equipment and strapping into an ejection seat further impact pilot pulmonary function. Acceptable pulmonary function required for high performance aircraft is not well understood. There is no consensus among North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) partners on how to perform pulmonary screening and which conditions and medications are acceptable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted with a questionnaire, gathering retrospective data. In 2019, questionnaires were sent out to national aeromedical representatives from 29 NATO countries and 3 allied nations. Questions were current aeromedical regulations used, pulmonary data collected from each individual pilot, acceptable pulmonary conditions, and acceptable medical treatments. Data were collected before the COVID-19 pandemic; a follow-up questionnaire was sent out after to ask if screening policies had changed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 questionnaires were returned from 13 NATO and 3 allied nations. This equates to an overall response rate of 50%. Pulmonary function testing is conducted on pilot applicants in 15/16 countries and 9/16 perform pulmonary function testing at every follow-up aeromedical examination as well. Conventional chest X-rays as a part of the first initial aeromedical examination are being used in 8/16 countries.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study describes the divergent medical standards for pulmonary function in NATO aircrew and confirms that no standards for best practice exist. Frijters E, Lindgaard K, Regn D, Gray G, Naylor J, Bushby A, Guettler N, Leino T. Policies on pulmonary screening and management of respiratory conditions in military pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(12):908-912.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"95 12","pages":"908-912"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6471.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Military pilots are subjected to unique pulmonary demands, particularly in high performance jets. The hypobaric environment necessitates use of on-board oxygen, breathing masks, and regulators to increase oxygen pressure, affecting ventilation and breathing responses. Safety features like pilot flight equipment and strapping into an ejection seat further impact pilot pulmonary function. Acceptable pulmonary function required for high performance aircraft is not well understood. There is no consensus among North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) partners on how to perform pulmonary screening and which conditions and medications are acceptable.

Methods: This study was conducted with a questionnaire, gathering retrospective data. In 2019, questionnaires were sent out to national aeromedical representatives from 29 NATO countries and 3 allied nations. Questions were current aeromedical regulations used, pulmonary data collected from each individual pilot, acceptable pulmonary conditions, and acceptable medical treatments. Data were collected before the COVID-19 pandemic; a follow-up questionnaire was sent out after to ask if screening policies had changed.

Results: A total of 16 questionnaires were returned from 13 NATO and 3 allied nations. This equates to an overall response rate of 50%. Pulmonary function testing is conducted on pilot applicants in 15/16 countries and 9/16 perform pulmonary function testing at every follow-up aeromedical examination as well. Conventional chest X-rays as a part of the first initial aeromedical examination are being used in 8/16 countries.

Discussion: This study describes the divergent medical standards for pulmonary function in NATO aircrew and confirms that no standards for best practice exist. Frijters E, Lindgaard K, Regn D, Gray G, Naylor J, Bushby A, Guettler N, Leino T. Policies on pulmonary screening and management of respiratory conditions in military pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(12):908-912.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信