Risk preferences in decision-making: A construal level perspective

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Hwan-Ho Noh , Hye Bin Rim , Byung-Kwan Lee
{"title":"Risk preferences in decision-making: A construal level perspective","authors":"Hwan-Ho Noh ,&nbsp;Hye Bin Rim ,&nbsp;Byung-Kwan Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of construal levels on preferences for risky choices in decision-making scenarios, focusing on how situational framing moderates these effects. We explored the role of construal level as a key moderator of the influence of risky-choice framing. Our findings show significant differences in preferences for risky options between gain- and loss-framing, especially in high-level construal contexts. This finding suggests that abstract thinking enhances framing effects, highlighting important implications for understanding decision-making processes and developing interventions to reduce bias. Conversely, this preference difference diminishes significantly under low-level construal, where focus on specific details, such as probability, is emphasized. The research reveals that framing influences attention allocation toward outcomes and processes in high-level construal but has a lesser effect in low-level construal. These results indicate that construal levels are crucial for shaping perception and framing effects. The study concludes with a discussion of the implications and recommendations for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 104675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824005535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of construal levels on preferences for risky choices in decision-making scenarios, focusing on how situational framing moderates these effects. We explored the role of construal level as a key moderator of the influence of risky-choice framing. Our findings show significant differences in preferences for risky options between gain- and loss-framing, especially in high-level construal contexts. This finding suggests that abstract thinking enhances framing effects, highlighting important implications for understanding decision-making processes and developing interventions to reduce bias. Conversely, this preference difference diminishes significantly under low-level construal, where focus on specific details, such as probability, is emphasized. The research reveals that framing influences attention allocation toward outcomes and processes in high-level construal but has a lesser effect in low-level construal. These results indicate that construal levels are crucial for shaping perception and framing effects. The study concludes with a discussion of the implications and recommendations for future research.
决策中的风险偏好:一个解释水平的视角。
本研究考察了解释水平对决策情景中风险选择偏好的影响,重点研究了情境框架如何调节这些影响。我们探讨了解释水平作为风险选择框架影响的关键调节因素的作用。我们的研究结果表明,在收益框架和损失框架之间,人们对风险选择的偏好存在显著差异,尤其是在高水平的解释背景下。这一发现表明,抽象思维增强了框架效应,强调了理解决策过程和制定干预措施以减少偏见的重要意义。相反,这种偏好差异在低水平解释下显著减少,在低水平解释中,重点放在特定细节上,如概率。研究表明,框架对高水平解释的结果和过程的注意分配有影响,但对低水平解释的影响较小。这些结果表明,解释水平对形成感知和框架效应至关重要。研究最后讨论了研究的意义和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信