Outcomes of CD19 CAR T in Transformed Indolent Lymphoma Compared to De Novo Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma

IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Swetha Kambhampati Thiruvengadam, Reid Merryman, Yan Wang, Charles Gaulin, Evandro Bezerra, Timothy Voorhees, Madhav R. Seshadri, Ayo Falade, Alma Habib, Amy A. Ayers, Megumi Bailey, Annette Brown, Neil Bailey, Krish Patel, Charalambos B. Andreadis, Adam S. Kittai, Caron Jacobson, Joycelynne Palmer, Stephen J. Forman, Loretta Nastoupil, Lihua E. Budde
{"title":"Outcomes of CD19 CAR T in Transformed Indolent Lymphoma Compared to De Novo Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma","authors":"Swetha Kambhampati Thiruvengadam,&nbsp;Reid Merryman,&nbsp;Yan Wang,&nbsp;Charles Gaulin,&nbsp;Evandro Bezerra,&nbsp;Timothy Voorhees,&nbsp;Madhav R. Seshadri,&nbsp;Ayo Falade,&nbsp;Alma Habib,&nbsp;Amy A. Ayers,&nbsp;Megumi Bailey,&nbsp;Annette Brown,&nbsp;Neil Bailey,&nbsp;Krish Patel,&nbsp;Charalambos B. Andreadis,&nbsp;Adam S. Kittai,&nbsp;Caron Jacobson,&nbsp;Joycelynne Palmer,&nbsp;Stephen J. Forman,&nbsp;Loretta Nastoupil,&nbsp;Lihua E. Budde","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized treatment of aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (aLBCL). Patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (tiNHL) were included in key CAR trials, but outcomes of CAR for this distinct, historically high-risk group are poorly understood. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 1182 patients with aLBCL receiving standard-of-care CAR T between 2017 and 2022, including 338 (29%) with tiNHL. Rates of grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were similar between tiNHL and de novo cohorts (7% vs. 8%, <i>p</i> = 0.6), while grade ≥ 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was lower in tiNHL (21% vs. 27%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Overall response rate was similar in both cohorts (83% vs. 81%, <i>p</i> = 0.3), while complete response rate was higher in tiNHL (67% vs. 59%, <i>p</i> = 0.017). With a median follow-up of 22.3 months, the progression/relapse-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between the tiNHL and de novo cohorts (24-month PFS 41% [95% CI: 35%–46%] vs. 38% [95% CI: 35%–42%]; 24-month OS 58% [95% CI: 52%–63%] vs. 52% [95% CI: 48%–56%], respectively). After adjusting for key risk factors, there was a trend toward a lower hazard of disease progression, relapse or death post-CAR for tiNHL patients compared to de novo aLBCL patients (HR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.69–1.0], <i>p</i> = 0.07). Elevated LDH, advanced stage, prior bendamustine within 12 months of CAR, receipt of bridging therapy, CNS involvement, and ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy were each associated with inferior PFS. In conclusion, CAR T therapy is highly effective with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with tiNHL.</p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"100 2","pages":"236-248"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.27548","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.27548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized treatment of aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (aLBCL). Patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (tiNHL) were included in key CAR trials, but outcomes of CAR for this distinct, historically high-risk group are poorly understood. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 1182 patients with aLBCL receiving standard-of-care CAR T between 2017 and 2022, including 338 (29%) with tiNHL. Rates of grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were similar between tiNHL and de novo cohorts (7% vs. 8%, p = 0.6), while grade ≥ 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was lower in tiNHL (21% vs. 27%, p = 0.02). Overall response rate was similar in both cohorts (83% vs. 81%, p = 0.3), while complete response rate was higher in tiNHL (67% vs. 59%, p = 0.017). With a median follow-up of 22.3 months, the progression/relapse-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between the tiNHL and de novo cohorts (24-month PFS 41% [95% CI: 35%–46%] vs. 38% [95% CI: 35%–42%]; 24-month OS 58% [95% CI: 52%–63%] vs. 52% [95% CI: 48%–56%], respectively). After adjusting for key risk factors, there was a trend toward a lower hazard of disease progression, relapse or death post-CAR for tiNHL patients compared to de novo aLBCL patients (HR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.69–1.0], p = 0.07). Elevated LDH, advanced stage, prior bendamustine within 12 months of CAR, receipt of bridging therapy, CNS involvement, and ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy were each associated with inferior PFS. In conclusion, CAR T therapy is highly effective with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with tiNHL.

Abstract Image

CD19 CAR - T治疗转化性惰性淋巴瘤与新生侵袭性大b细胞淋巴瘤的疗效比较
嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞疗法已经彻底改变了侵袭性大b细胞淋巴瘤(aLBCL)的治疗。转化为惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(tiNHL)的患者被纳入了关键的CAR试验,但CAR对这一独特的、历史上高风险群体的结果知之甚少。我们进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,在2017年至2022年期间对1182名接受标准治疗CAR - T治疗的白化淋巴瘤患者进行了研究,其中包括338例(29%)的tiNHL患者。≥3级细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)的发生率在tiNHL和新生组之间相似(7%对8%,p = 0.6),而≥3级免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征在tiNHL中较低(21%对27%,p = 0.02)。两个队列的总缓解率相似(83%对81%,p = 0.3),而tiNHL的完全缓解率更高(67%对59%,p = 0.017)。中位随访时间为22.3个月,tiNHL和新生组的无进展/无复发(PFS)和总生存率(OS)相似(24个月PFS为41% [95% CI: 35%-46%] vs. 38% [95% CI: 35%-42%];24个月的OS分别为58% [95% CI: 52% - 63%]和52% [95% CI: 48%-56%])。在调整关键危险因素后,与新发alcl患者相比,tiNHL患者car - car后疾病进展、复发或死亡的风险更低(HR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.69-1.0], p = 0.07)。LDH升高、晚期、CAR 12个月内使用苯达莫司汀、接受桥接治疗、中枢神经系统受累和≥3种既往治疗均与较差的PFS相关。总之,CAR - T治疗在tiNHL患者中是非常有效的,并且具有可接受的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hematology offers extensive coverage of experimental and clinical aspects of blood diseases in humans and animal models. The journal publishes original contributions in both non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases, encompassing clinical and basic studies in areas such as hemostasis, thrombosis, immunology, blood banking, and stem cell biology. Clinical translational reports highlighting innovative therapeutic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases are actively encouraged.The American Journal of Hematology features regular original laboratory and clinical research articles, brief research reports, critical reviews, images in hematology, as well as letters and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信