Revealing the Effect of Solvent Additive Selectivity on Morphology and Formation Kinetics in Printed Non‐fullerene Organic Solar Cells at Ambient Conditions
Jinsheng Zhang, Zerui Li, Xinyu Jiang, Lin Xie, Guangjiu Pan, Altantulga Buyan‐Arivjikh, Thomas Baier, Suo Tu, Lixing Li, Matthias Schwartzkopf, Sarathlal Koyiloth Vayalil, Stephan V. Roth, Ziyi Ge, Peter Müller‐Buschbaum
{"title":"Revealing the Effect of Solvent Additive Selectivity on Morphology and Formation Kinetics in Printed Non‐fullerene Organic Solar Cells at Ambient Conditions","authors":"Jinsheng Zhang, Zerui Li, Xinyu Jiang, Lin Xie, Guangjiu Pan, Altantulga Buyan‐Arivjikh, Thomas Baier, Suo Tu, Lixing Li, Matthias Schwartzkopf, Sarathlal Koyiloth Vayalil, Stephan V. Roth, Ziyi Ge, Peter Müller‐Buschbaum","doi":"10.1002/aenm.202404724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solvent additives enable the efficient modification of the morphology to improve the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of organic solar cells. However, the impact of solvent additive selectivity on the film morphology and formation kinetics is still unclarified. Herein, this work investigates two solvent additives, 1‐chloronaphthalene (1‐CN) and tetralin, characterized by their varying selectivity for the polymer donor (PBDB‐T‐2F) and the non‐fullerene small molecule acceptor (BTP‐C3‐4F). Specifically, 1‐CN exhibits superior solubility for BTP‐C3‐4F over PBDB‐T‐2F, whereas tetralin shows the opposite trend. The blend films with and without solvent additives are fabricated with the slot‐die coating at ambient conditions. Both solvent additives can promote larger phase separation and increase the size of crystals of the selectively dissolved component. In situ grazing‐incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering and UV–vis absorption spectra during printing unveil two distinct kinetic processes induced by 1‐CN and tetralin, leading to large‐sized crystals. 1‐CN can prolong the liquid‐solid phase separation to provide sufficient time for the BTP‐C3‐4F crystal growth but suppress the crystal growth of PBDB‐T‐2F. Tetralin can swell PBDB‐T‐2F and break down BTP‐C3‐4F crystals at the same time. Upon thermal annealing, the oversized crystals triggered by both solvent additives can be optimized to an appropriate size, resulting in an enhanced PCE.","PeriodicalId":111,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Energy Materials","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202404724","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Solvent additives enable the efficient modification of the morphology to improve the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of organic solar cells. However, the impact of solvent additive selectivity on the film morphology and formation kinetics is still unclarified. Herein, this work investigates two solvent additives, 1‐chloronaphthalene (1‐CN) and tetralin, characterized by their varying selectivity for the polymer donor (PBDB‐T‐2F) and the non‐fullerene small molecule acceptor (BTP‐C3‐4F). Specifically, 1‐CN exhibits superior solubility for BTP‐C3‐4F over PBDB‐T‐2F, whereas tetralin shows the opposite trend. The blend films with and without solvent additives are fabricated with the slot‐die coating at ambient conditions. Both solvent additives can promote larger phase separation and increase the size of crystals of the selectively dissolved component. In situ grazing‐incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering and UV–vis absorption spectra during printing unveil two distinct kinetic processes induced by 1‐CN and tetralin, leading to large‐sized crystals. 1‐CN can prolong the liquid‐solid phase separation to provide sufficient time for the BTP‐C3‐4F crystal growth but suppress the crystal growth of PBDB‐T‐2F. Tetralin can swell PBDB‐T‐2F and break down BTP‐C3‐4F crystals at the same time. Upon thermal annealing, the oversized crystals triggered by both solvent additives can be optimized to an appropriate size, resulting in an enhanced PCE.
期刊介绍:
Established in 2011, Advanced Energy Materials is an international, interdisciplinary, English-language journal that focuses on materials used in energy harvesting, conversion, and storage. It is regarded as a top-quality journal alongside Advanced Materials, Advanced Functional Materials, and Small.
With a 2022 Impact Factor of 27.8, Advanced Energy Materials is considered a prime source for the best energy-related research. The journal covers a wide range of topics in energy-related research, including organic and inorganic photovoltaics, batteries and supercapacitors, fuel cells, hydrogen generation and storage, thermoelectrics, water splitting and photocatalysis, solar fuels and thermosolar power, magnetocalorics, and piezoelectronics.
The readership of Advanced Energy Materials includes materials scientists, chemists, physicists, and engineers in both academia and industry. The journal is indexed in various databases and collections, such as Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database, FIZ Karlsruhe, INSPEC (IET), Science Citation Index Expanded, Technology Collection, and Web of Science, among others.