Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors use and risk of dementia in different ethnoracial groups with type 2 diabetes

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shih-Chi Yang, Wen-Chieh Liao, Yi-Sheng Jhang, Hui-Chin Chang, Yu-Jung Su, Shiu-Jau Chen, Shuo-Yan Gau
{"title":"Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors use and risk of dementia in different ethnoracial groups with type 2 diabetes","authors":"Shih-Chi Yang, Wen-Chieh Liao, Yi-Sheng Jhang, Hui-Chin Chang, Yu-Jung Su, Shiu-Jau Chen, Shuo-Yan Gau","doi":"10.1002/alz.14353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p>\n<p>The link between dementia and glucose-lowering drugs has been widely studied. Tang et al. reported that new users of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors had a lower risk of dementia compared to sulfonylurea users.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Other glucose-lowering drugs, like metformin and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), are also associated with reduced dementia risk and slower cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes patients. Previous studies used various glucose-lowering drugs as active comparators to assess SGLT-2 inhibitors' effects on dementia.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> However, studies have shown significant ethnoracial disparities in dementia, with Black individuals (compared to White individuals) and Hispanic individuals (compared to non-Hispanic, predominantly White individuals) experiencing higher prevalence and incidence rates of dementia.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> Moreover, both Black and Hispanic populations are at a greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes, which is itself a known risk factor for dementia. Ensuring that these at-risk ethnoracial groups can access and benefit from targeted interventions is therefore essential for promoting brain health equity. To address the knowledge gap, we hereby conducted an analysis using the TriNetX research network, which has not been fully explored in previous studies.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span></p>\n<p>We utilized the TriNetX research network, specifically the US Collaborative Network subset, which includes 66 US institutions and is updated monthly, and applied in various epidemiological studies.<span><sup>8, 9</sup></span> It offers access to anonymized electronic medical records and claims data, including patient information from healthcare organizations (HCOs) related to disease diagnoses, medication prescriptions, medical procedures, and laboratory results. Participants were aged 50 years and older, diagnosed with diabetes mellitus between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, and had more than two visit records. The control group included diabetes patients using sulfonylureas, metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, and GLP-1 RAs. Exclusions were made for those under 50; those with prior dementia, Parkinson's disease, or Alzheimer's disease; or those who were deceased before the index date. The case group consisted of SGLT-2 users. Individuals who had ever used the alternate drug were excluded when comparing the two drug groups. Before matching and exclusion of prior glucose-lowering drug use, there were 279,122 SGLT-2 inhibitor users, 512,944 sulfonylurea users, 1,301,591 metformin users, 319,098 DPP4 inhibitor users, and 306,499 GLP-1 RA users. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in all analyses. 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was new-onset dementia, with participants monitored from 3 months post-index date until dementia occurrence or their last visit, whichever came first. To assess potential ethnoracial disparities, we conducted stratification analyses based on ethnoracial subgroups, including White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian subgroups. All analyses were conducted using the TriNetX analytical platform, and the research was exempt from Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.</p>\n<p>Our analysis indicates that SGLT2 inhibitor users had a lower hazard ratio (HR) of dementia compared to those using sulfonylureas (HR: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 0.86), metformin (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.97), and DPP4 inhibitors (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.74), but increased risk compared to GLP1-RA users (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.20). In Whites, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk compared to sulfonylureas and DPP4 inhibitors, but with a slightly higher risk compared to GLP1-RA, with no significant difference compared to metformin. In Blacks, SGLT2 inhibitors had a lower risk compared to sulfonylureas and DPP4 inhibitors, but no significant difference compared to metformin or GLP1-RA. Among Hispanics, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk compared to sulfonylureas, DPP4 inhibitors, and GLP1-RA, but showed no significant difference with metformin. In Asians, no statistically significant differences were observed (Figure 1).</p>\n<figure><picture>\n<source media=\"(min-width: 1650px)\" srcset=\"/cms/asset/d4471672-40d8-4d0f-9583-80c5afcf89d2/alz14353-fig-0001-m.jpg\"/><img alt=\"Details are in the caption following the image\" data-lg-src=\"/cms/asset/d4471672-40d8-4d0f-9583-80c5afcf89d2/alz14353-fig-0001-m.jpg\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"/cms/asset/1fd46df2-9f67-4f40-b03f-19efebe4c53b/alz14353-fig-0001-m.png\" title=\"Details are in the caption following the image\"/></picture><figcaption>\n<div><strong>FIGURE 1<span style=\"font-weight:normal\"></span></strong><div>Open in figure viewer</div>\n</div>\n<div>Risk of dementia in different glucose-lowering drugs for the entire sample and as stratified by ethnoracial subgroups. Average follow-up time refers to the follow-up time of each cohort after propensity score matching. Propensity score matching was reperformed in each analysis, accounting for covariates including age, sex, body mass index, socioeconomic status, substance abuse, comedications, comorbidities, and medical utilization status. CI, confidence interval; DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP1, glucagon-like peptide-1; SGLT2, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2.</div>\n</figcaption>\n</figure>\n<p>Our findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce dementia risk compared to other blood sugar medications, with benefits extending across different ethnoracial groups. However, we did not test the interaction between ethnoracial group and treatment terms, so we cannot conclude if these differences are significant. Additionally, the impact of changing drug use was not fully assessed. In line with Tang et al.,<span><sup>1</sup></span> we report that Hispanic SGLT2 users present a significantly lower dementia risk compared to sulfonylurea and GLP1-RA users. Moreover, the lack of significance in the Asian group may be due to the small sample size, highlighting the need for larger studies on Asian Americans. Notably, in the current study, SGLT2 users had a higher dementia risk compared to GLP1-RA users, especially in Whites, whereas this trend was reversed in Hispanics. The association may be influenced by unmeasured factors like medication dosage, warranting further head-to-head studies of SGLT2 versus GLP1-RA for dementia risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14353","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor,

The link between dementia and glucose-lowering drugs has been widely studied. Tang et al. reported that new users of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors had a lower risk of dementia compared to sulfonylurea users.1 Other glucose-lowering drugs, like metformin and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), are also associated with reduced dementia risk and slower cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes patients. Previous studies used various glucose-lowering drugs as active comparators to assess SGLT-2 inhibitors' effects on dementia.2, 3 However, studies have shown significant ethnoracial disparities in dementia, with Black individuals (compared to White individuals) and Hispanic individuals (compared to non-Hispanic, predominantly White individuals) experiencing higher prevalence and incidence rates of dementia.4, 5 Moreover, both Black and Hispanic populations are at a greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes, which is itself a known risk factor for dementia. Ensuring that these at-risk ethnoracial groups can access and benefit from targeted interventions is therefore essential for promoting brain health equity. To address the knowledge gap, we hereby conducted an analysis using the TriNetX research network, which has not been fully explored in previous studies.6, 7

We utilized the TriNetX research network, specifically the US Collaborative Network subset, which includes 66 US institutions and is updated monthly, and applied in various epidemiological studies.8, 9 It offers access to anonymized electronic medical records and claims data, including patient information from healthcare organizations (HCOs) related to disease diagnoses, medication prescriptions, medical procedures, and laboratory results. Participants were aged 50 years and older, diagnosed with diabetes mellitus between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, and had more than two visit records. The control group included diabetes patients using sulfonylureas, metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, and GLP-1 RAs. Exclusions were made for those under 50; those with prior dementia, Parkinson's disease, or Alzheimer's disease; or those who were deceased before the index date. The case group consisted of SGLT-2 users. Individuals who had ever used the alternate drug were excluded when comparing the two drug groups. Before matching and exclusion of prior glucose-lowering drug use, there were 279,122 SGLT-2 inhibitor users, 512,944 sulfonylurea users, 1,301,591 metformin users, 319,098 DPP4 inhibitor users, and 306,499 GLP-1 RA users. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in all analyses. 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was new-onset dementia, with participants monitored from 3 months post-index date until dementia occurrence or their last visit, whichever came first. To assess potential ethnoracial disparities, we conducted stratification analyses based on ethnoracial subgroups, including White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian subgroups. All analyses were conducted using the TriNetX analytical platform, and the research was exempt from Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.

Our analysis indicates that SGLT2 inhibitor users had a lower hazard ratio (HR) of dementia compared to those using sulfonylureas (HR: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 0.86), metformin (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.97), and DPP4 inhibitors (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.74), but increased risk compared to GLP1-RA users (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.20). In Whites, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk compared to sulfonylureas and DPP4 inhibitors, but with a slightly higher risk compared to GLP1-RA, with no significant difference compared to metformin. In Blacks, SGLT2 inhibitors had a lower risk compared to sulfonylureas and DPP4 inhibitors, but no significant difference compared to metformin or GLP1-RA. Among Hispanics, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk compared to sulfonylureas, DPP4 inhibitors, and GLP1-RA, but showed no significant difference with metformin. In Asians, no statistically significant differences were observed (Figure 1).

Abstract Image
FIGURE 1
Open in figure viewer
Risk of dementia in different glucose-lowering drugs for the entire sample and as stratified by ethnoracial subgroups. Average follow-up time refers to the follow-up time of each cohort after propensity score matching. Propensity score matching was reperformed in each analysis, accounting for covariates including age, sex, body mass index, socioeconomic status, substance abuse, comedications, comorbidities, and medical utilization status. CI, confidence interval; DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP1, glucagon-like peptide-1; SGLT2, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2.

Our findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce dementia risk compared to other blood sugar medications, with benefits extending across different ethnoracial groups. However, we did not test the interaction between ethnoracial group and treatment terms, so we cannot conclude if these differences are significant. Additionally, the impact of changing drug use was not fully assessed. In line with Tang et al.,1 we report that Hispanic SGLT2 users present a significantly lower dementia risk compared to sulfonylurea and GLP1-RA users. Moreover, the lack of significance in the Asian group may be due to the small sample size, highlighting the need for larger studies on Asian Americans. Notably, in the current study, SGLT2 users had a higher dementia risk compared to GLP1-RA users, especially in Whites, whereas this trend was reversed in Hispanics. The association may be influenced by unmeasured factors like medication dosage, warranting further head-to-head studies of SGLT2 versus GLP1-RA for dementia risk.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信