Perioperative lifestyle and nutritional interventions' details reporting in bariatric surgery trials according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist: a cross-sectional study.
{"title":"Perioperative lifestyle and nutritional interventions' details reporting in bariatric surgery trials according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Mateusz J Swierz, Dawid Storman, Oliwia Madej, Joanna Krolikowska, Edyta Dyngosz, Aneta Kotlarek, Karolina Zawadzka, Zuzanna Sawiec, Pawel Jemiolo, Joanna Zajac, Sylwia Warzecha, Malgorzata Maraj, Karolina Majdak, Malgorzata M Bala","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is considered the most effective treatment for people with severe obesity, and certain interventions could enhance its long-term results. The complete reporting of interventions' details is necessary for their replication in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the completeness of reporting of lifestyle and nutritional interventions applied in immediate perioperative period (30-days preoperatively and postoperatively) in patients undergoing MBS using the 12-item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist, and to explore factors associated with compliant reporting.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL up to April 14 2024. The screening, extraction, and assessments were performed independently by 2 authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information from the manuscript, protocol, and supplementary materials in 72 trials comprising 76 interventions satisfied a mean of the 70.4% (standard deviation 16.5) of TIDieR items. Altogether, 6.6% of the interventions fulfilled all items. The lowest scoring items were adherence to intervention (item 12, reported in 51.3% of the interventions), modes of delivery (item 6, 42.1%), intervention provider (item 5, 38.3%), and fidelity assessment and maintenance planning (item 11, 23.7%). A total of 6.9% of the trials contained relevant information in the protocol or supplementary materials and 93.1% required contacting authors for clarifications. We identified the number of authors, availability of a study protocol, availability of supplementary materials, reporting of the compliance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines, and reporting of a plan for dealing with missing outcome data as predictors of better reporting, while the Asian country of the corresponding author implied less compliant reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The completeness of reporting of lifestyle and nutritional interventions applied in immediate perioperative period in patients undergoing MBS is suboptimal and, consequently, impedes their replication in clinical practice. A wider adoption of the TIDieR checklist by authors, reviewers, and journal editors should enhance the transparency, clarity, and transferability of research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94216,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is considered the most effective treatment for people with severe obesity, and certain interventions could enhance its long-term results. The complete reporting of interventions' details is necessary for their replication in clinical settings.
Objectives: To investigate the completeness of reporting of lifestyle and nutritional interventions applied in immediate perioperative period (30-days preoperatively and postoperatively) in patients undergoing MBS using the 12-item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist, and to explore factors associated with compliant reporting.
Setting: A cross-sectional study.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL up to April 14 2024. The screening, extraction, and assessments were performed independently by 2 authors.
Results: Information from the manuscript, protocol, and supplementary materials in 72 trials comprising 76 interventions satisfied a mean of the 70.4% (standard deviation 16.5) of TIDieR items. Altogether, 6.6% of the interventions fulfilled all items. The lowest scoring items were adherence to intervention (item 12, reported in 51.3% of the interventions), modes of delivery (item 6, 42.1%), intervention provider (item 5, 38.3%), and fidelity assessment and maintenance planning (item 11, 23.7%). A total of 6.9% of the trials contained relevant information in the protocol or supplementary materials and 93.1% required contacting authors for clarifications. We identified the number of authors, availability of a study protocol, availability of supplementary materials, reporting of the compliance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines, and reporting of a plan for dealing with missing outcome data as predictors of better reporting, while the Asian country of the corresponding author implied less compliant reporting.
Conclusions: The completeness of reporting of lifestyle and nutritional interventions applied in immediate perioperative period in patients undergoing MBS is suboptimal and, consequently, impedes their replication in clinical practice. A wider adoption of the TIDieR checklist by authors, reviewers, and journal editors should enhance the transparency, clarity, and transferability of research.