Meghan Eagen-Torkko, Molly Altman, Julie Chor, Linda S Franck, Mara Greenberg, Louise P King, Ellen Solis, Daniel Suárez-Baquero, Alicia Swartz, Monica R McLemore
{"title":"Why abortion is healthcare.","authors":"Meghan Eagen-Torkko, Molly Altman, Julie Chor, Linda S Franck, Mara Greenberg, Louise P King, Ellen Solis, Daniel Suárez-Baquero, Alicia Swartz, Monica R McLemore","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This invited commentary provides an in-depth critique and analysis of \"Abortion is healthcare: In what sense?\" (Martsolf, Tollefsen, and Curlin). We reject the claims put forth in their piece on three distinct grounds. First, the language used throughout the manuscript is imprecise and ableist. Next, the false and simplistic dichotomy of pregnancy as a state of health, while positioning abortion as exclusively harmful and risky is scientifically inaccurate. Finally, the authors fail to grapple with nursing as either technical or moral; and never address it as a profession with a social contract. We end our analysis with suggestions to continue this conversation and to engage readers in participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":" ","pages":"102345"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This invited commentary provides an in-depth critique and analysis of "Abortion is healthcare: In what sense?" (Martsolf, Tollefsen, and Curlin). We reject the claims put forth in their piece on three distinct grounds. First, the language used throughout the manuscript is imprecise and ableist. Next, the false and simplistic dichotomy of pregnancy as a state of health, while positioning abortion as exclusively harmful and risky is scientifically inaccurate. Finally, the authors fail to grapple with nursing as either technical or moral; and never address it as a profession with a social contract. We end our analysis with suggestions to continue this conversation and to engage readers in participation.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.