Investigating ethical considerations in the communication network of married women undergone hysterectomy: instrumentation of a questionnaire.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Elahe Bahador, Laleh Tajadiny, Abolfazl Hossein Nataj, Masumeh Ghazanfarpour, Azam Zare Arashlouei, Atefeh Ahmadi, Fahimeh Khorasani, Mina Mobasher, Jaleh Tajadini
{"title":"Investigating ethical considerations in the communication network of married women undergone hysterectomy: instrumentation of a questionnaire.","authors":"Elahe Bahador, Laleh Tajadiny, Abolfazl Hossein Nataj, Masumeh Ghazanfarpour, Azam Zare Arashlouei, Atefeh Ahmadi, Fahimeh Khorasani, Mina Mobasher, Jaleh Tajadini","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01152-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Considering the importance of complying medical and general ethics and the lack of a study on determining ethical considerations in the communication network of women undergoing hysterectomy surgery, this study aimed to present these aspects in the patients' lives by a standard researcher-made instrument.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This mixed method analysis (exploratory sequential mixed methods design was conducted in the whole of 2020 to create the \"ethical considerations in communication network of women undergone hysterectomy\" questionnaire and investigate its psychometric properties. A researched-made instrument was validated and its psychometric properties were checked among 218 women by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accordingly, the 8 factors extracted included \"complying ethical consideration by the physician (a)\", \"complying ethical consideration by medical team (b)\", \"complying ethical consideration in the hospital (c)\", \"complying ethical consideration by the secretory in the clinic (d)\", \"complying ethical consideration by the spouse (e)\", and \"complying ethical consideration by the family and friends (f)\", \"complying ethical consideration by the media and society (g)\" and \"complying ethical consideration by herself (h)\". The results of Cronbach's alpha test showed that there is moderate to good internal consistency in all dimensions. Cronbach's alpha for the whole questionnaire was calculated as 0.75, which shows that the internal consistency is at a good level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of this study, the reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity of the ethical considerations in the communication network of women undergoing hysterectomy questionnaire were confirmed. However, in light of the study limitations, caution should be practiced in the interpretation of the results. There is a need for further longitudinal studies in multiple settings using random sampling methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01152-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Considering the importance of complying medical and general ethics and the lack of a study on determining ethical considerations in the communication network of women undergoing hysterectomy surgery, this study aimed to present these aspects in the patients' lives by a standard researcher-made instrument.

Method: This mixed method analysis (exploratory sequential mixed methods design was conducted in the whole of 2020 to create the "ethical considerations in communication network of women undergone hysterectomy" questionnaire and investigate its psychometric properties. A researched-made instrument was validated and its psychometric properties were checked among 218 women by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results: Accordingly, the 8 factors extracted included "complying ethical consideration by the physician (a)", "complying ethical consideration by medical team (b)", "complying ethical consideration in the hospital (c)", "complying ethical consideration by the secretory in the clinic (d)", "complying ethical consideration by the spouse (e)", and "complying ethical consideration by the family and friends (f)", "complying ethical consideration by the media and society (g)" and "complying ethical consideration by herself (h)". The results of Cronbach's alpha test showed that there is moderate to good internal consistency in all dimensions. Cronbach's alpha for the whole questionnaire was calculated as 0.75, which shows that the internal consistency is at a good level.

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity of the ethical considerations in the communication network of women undergoing hysterectomy questionnaire were confirmed. However, in light of the study limitations, caution should be practiced in the interpretation of the results. There is a need for further longitudinal studies in multiple settings using random sampling methods.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信