Maud J J Ter Bogt, Kirsten E Bevelander, Esther A H Kramer, Merel M van der Wal, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen
{"title":"Mapping the dynamics of learning communities about Dutch healthy weight approaches: a causal loop diagram.","authors":"Maud J J Ter Bogt, Kirsten E Bevelander, Esther A H Kramer, Merel M van der Wal, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01468-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning communities (LCs) are increasingly used among multidisciplinary public health challenges, such as local healthy weight approaches. LCs aim to stimulate learning, collaboration and actions. Previous research has provided insights into the underlying elements of multidisciplinary LCs, but little is known about the perceived causalities of these elements. Therefore, limited is known about what can be done to leverage LCs. This study aims to gain insights into the perceived dynamics of multidisciplinary LCs during the starting phase, including variables, and interconnectedness between variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To elucidate LC dynamics, all members of two separate LCs participated in a qualitative interview about experiences, perceived learning, and actions during the first six months. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Subsequently, a qualitative causal loop diagram was designed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative causal loop diagram showed three intertwined themes. The first theme explains why group dynamics are essential, and how jointly arranging the LC may optimize group dynamics. The second theme explains how insights are obtained through multidisciplinary knowledge exchange. The third theme explains how actions are executed when conditions are met. These LC group dynamics, learning and action influenced one another.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To optimize LCs, it is highly recommended that stakeholders arrange them jointly, involve the appropriate partners, match with LC members' needs, and motivate members to execute action. LC facilitators are recommended to use the causal loop diagram to identify their bottlenecks and how to intervene in those to optimize the LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"82 1","pages":"238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01468-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Learning communities (LCs) are increasingly used among multidisciplinary public health challenges, such as local healthy weight approaches. LCs aim to stimulate learning, collaboration and actions. Previous research has provided insights into the underlying elements of multidisciplinary LCs, but little is known about the perceived causalities of these elements. Therefore, limited is known about what can be done to leverage LCs. This study aims to gain insights into the perceived dynamics of multidisciplinary LCs during the starting phase, including variables, and interconnectedness between variables.
Methods: To elucidate LC dynamics, all members of two separate LCs participated in a qualitative interview about experiences, perceived learning, and actions during the first six months. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Subsequently, a qualitative causal loop diagram was designed.
Results: The qualitative causal loop diagram showed three intertwined themes. The first theme explains why group dynamics are essential, and how jointly arranging the LC may optimize group dynamics. The second theme explains how insights are obtained through multidisciplinary knowledge exchange. The third theme explains how actions are executed when conditions are met. These LC group dynamics, learning and action influenced one another.
Conclusions: To optimize LCs, it is highly recommended that stakeholders arrange them jointly, involve the appropriate partners, match with LC members' needs, and motivate members to execute action. LC facilitators are recommended to use the causal loop diagram to identify their bottlenecks and how to intervene in those to optimize the LC.
期刊介绍:
rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.