Tolerability and efficacy of botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of bromhidrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

IF 0.6 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Muhammad Candragupta Jihwaprani, Tiara Dinar Ismirahmadani, Yipeng Sun, Ayu Wikan Sayekti, Idris Sula, Nazmus Saquib
{"title":"Tolerability and efficacy of botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of bromhidrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.","authors":"Muhammad Candragupta Jihwaprani, Tiara Dinar Ismirahmadani, Yipeng Sun, Ayu Wikan Sayekti, Idris Sula, Nazmus Saquib","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review evaluates the risks and benefits of botulinum toxin (BTX) therapy for treating bromhidrosis. A search was conducted across six databases, including clinical trials comparing BTX therapy with BTX-free controls. The analyzed outcomes included pooled adverse events (AEs), treatment success, ≥ 50% overall improvement, and recurrence rates. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Fourteen trials involving 1,293 participants were eligible. The BTX group experienced significantly fewer AEs than controls (relative risk [RR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33 [0.20-0.54]). Subgroup analysis indicated that the AE reduction was significant only when compared to small skin incision procedures. Overall, BTX did not show significant treatment success (RR [95% CI]: 1.06 [0.85-1.34]) or ≥ 50% improvement (RR [95% CI]: 0.98 [0.93-1.03]). However, BTX demonstrated superior treatment success compared to electrocauterization (RR [95% CI]: 1.45 [1.15-1.83]) and ethanol injection (RR [95% CI]: 2.27 [1.49-3.45]). Against placebos, BTX significantly reduced odor intensity (mean difference [95% CI]: 1.39 [-2.63 to -0.16]). Nevertheless, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in the BTX group (RR [95% CI]: 3.80 [1.06-13.67]). Notably, most studies (n = 9) were of low quality. In conclusion, although BTX is safe, it is not effective for the treatment of bromhidrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":45914,"journal":{"name":"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica","volume":"33 4","pages":"179-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review evaluates the risks and benefits of botulinum toxin (BTX) therapy for treating bromhidrosis. A search was conducted across six databases, including clinical trials comparing BTX therapy with BTX-free controls. The analyzed outcomes included pooled adverse events (AEs), treatment success, ≥ 50% overall improvement, and recurrence rates. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Fourteen trials involving 1,293 participants were eligible. The BTX group experienced significantly fewer AEs than controls (relative risk [RR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33 [0.20-0.54]). Subgroup analysis indicated that the AE reduction was significant only when compared to small skin incision procedures. Overall, BTX did not show significant treatment success (RR [95% CI]: 1.06 [0.85-1.34]) or ≥ 50% improvement (RR [95% CI]: 0.98 [0.93-1.03]). However, BTX demonstrated superior treatment success compared to electrocauterization (RR [95% CI]: 1.45 [1.15-1.83]) and ethanol injection (RR [95% CI]: 2.27 [1.49-3.45]). Against placebos, BTX significantly reduced odor intensity (mean difference [95% CI]: 1.39 [-2.63 to -0.16]). Nevertheless, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in the BTX group (RR [95% CI]: 3.80 [1.06-13.67]). Notably, most studies (n = 9) were of low quality. In conclusion, although BTX is safe, it is not effective for the treatment of bromhidrosis.

肉毒杆菌毒素注射治疗腋臭的耐受性和疗效:临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本综述评估了肉毒杆菌毒素(BTX)治疗腋臭的风险和益处。在六个数据库中进行了搜索,包括比较BTX治疗与无BTX对照的临床试验。分析的结果包括汇总不良事件(ae)、治疗成功、≥50%的总体改善和复发率。进行亚组分析和敏感性分析。14项试验涉及1293名参与者符合条件。BTX组的ae明显少于对照组(相对危险度[RR], 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.33[0.20-0.54])。亚组分析表明,与小皮肤切口手术相比,AE的减少是显著的。总体而言,BTX未显示出显著的治疗成功(RR [95% CI]: 1.06[0.85-1.34])或≥50%的改善(RR [95% CI]: 0.98[0.93-1.03])。然而,与电烧灼(RR [95% CI]: 1.45[1.15-1.83])和乙醇注射(RR [95% CI]: 2.27[1.49-3.45])相比,BTX的治疗成功率更高。与安慰剂相比,BTX显著降低了气味强度(平均差异[95% CI]: 1.39[-2.63至-0.16])。然而,BTX组复发率明显高于BTX组(RR [95% CI]: 3.80[1.06-13.67])。值得注意的是,大多数研究(n = 9)质量较低。综上所述,虽然BTX是安全的,但它对腋臭的治疗并不有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信