Oded Cohen, Yael Skversky-Blocq, Madeleine Mueller, Jan Haaker, Tomer Shechner
{"title":"Downstream effects of observational threat learning: Generalization and reversal learning across development.","authors":"Oded Cohen, Yael Skversky-Blocq, Madeleine Mueller, Jan Haaker, Tomer Shechner","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Observational threat learning is a complex social learning process through which typical and atypical fears develop. While studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of observational learning for the acquisition and extinction of threat, the intricacies of this learning process and how it varies across development have been less explored. To this end, we examined the extent to which children, adolescents, and adults generalized threat responses following observational threat learning. We also tested the capacity for reversal acquisition of these threat associations, again through observation. Participants (n = 159) from three age groups underwent four consecutive learning phases: observational threat acquisition, direct generalization, observational reversal threat acquisition, and a direct reversal test. Threat responses were measured using psychophysiological and subjective indices. Results indicated that following successful observational threat learning, children, adults, and adolescents experienced threat generalization. Developmental differences emerged for reversal threat acquisition, with adolescents demonstrating poorer learning than children and adults. The study expands current knowledge on how observational threat learning is used in changing circumstances and how it unfolds across development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"184 ","pages":"104670"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2024.104670","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Observational threat learning is a complex social learning process through which typical and atypical fears develop. While studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of observational learning for the acquisition and extinction of threat, the intricacies of this learning process and how it varies across development have been less explored. To this end, we examined the extent to which children, adolescents, and adults generalized threat responses following observational threat learning. We also tested the capacity for reversal acquisition of these threat associations, again through observation. Participants (n = 159) from three age groups underwent four consecutive learning phases: observational threat acquisition, direct generalization, observational reversal threat acquisition, and a direct reversal test. Threat responses were measured using psychophysiological and subjective indices. Results indicated that following successful observational threat learning, children, adults, and adolescents experienced threat generalization. Developmental differences emerged for reversal threat acquisition, with adolescents demonstrating poorer learning than children and adults. The study expands current knowledge on how observational threat learning is used in changing circumstances and how it unfolds across development.
期刊介绍:
The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.