The quality of orthognathic surgery information on social media: A scoping review.

IF 1.8 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mimi Ngo, Emilija Jensen, Maurice Meade
{"title":"The quality of orthognathic surgery information on social media: A scoping review.","authors":"Mimi Ngo, Emilija Jensen, Maurice Meade","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orthognathic surgery combined with orthodontic treatment is commonly undertaken to address facial and dental disharmony. Content uploaded onto social media platforms can be an important source of healthcare information. This scoping review aimed to collate and synthesize data from studies that investigated the quality of information communicated through these platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases and grey literature were searched, with no restrictions on location and year published. The PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework was adopted to select eligible studies. Inclusion criteria included literature that assessed the quality of information on orthognathic surgery in relation to orthodontic treatment in the context of social media.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 cross-sectional studies satisfied the selection criteria. The most investigated social media platform was YouTube. The quality of information on all platforms examined was found to be poor to moderate. The most popular content featured patients sharing their treatment experiences, but these often lacked clinically relevant information, focusing mainly on satisfaction with treatment, outcomes and their supervising healthcare professionals. In contrast, healthcare professionals provided content that contained better quality information but had lower views and engagement. The least frequently mentioned topics were found to be complications and their duration, costs, and postoperative expectations. Certain search terms such as \"#jawsurgery\", \"#surgeryfirst\" and \"#genioplasty\" appeared to resonate more with the public. There was heterogeneity across the methodologies and quality of information instruments used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Information communicated through social media platforms regarding orthognathic surgery was of poor to moderate quality. Orthodontic professionals should be aware of the limitations of health information on these online platforms and guide individuals to more accurate sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"23 1","pages":"100959"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Orthognathic surgery combined with orthodontic treatment is commonly undertaken to address facial and dental disharmony. Content uploaded onto social media platforms can be an important source of healthcare information. This scoping review aimed to collate and synthesize data from studies that investigated the quality of information communicated through these platforms.

Methods: Five databases and grey literature were searched, with no restrictions on location and year published. The PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework was adopted to select eligible studies. Inclusion criteria included literature that assessed the quality of information on orthognathic surgery in relation to orthodontic treatment in the context of social media.

Results: A total of 12 cross-sectional studies satisfied the selection criteria. The most investigated social media platform was YouTube. The quality of information on all platforms examined was found to be poor to moderate. The most popular content featured patients sharing their treatment experiences, but these often lacked clinically relevant information, focusing mainly on satisfaction with treatment, outcomes and their supervising healthcare professionals. In contrast, healthcare professionals provided content that contained better quality information but had lower views and engagement. The least frequently mentioned topics were found to be complications and their duration, costs, and postoperative expectations. Certain search terms such as "#jawsurgery", "#surgeryfirst" and "#genioplasty" appeared to resonate more with the public. There was heterogeneity across the methodologies and quality of information instruments used.

Conclusions: Information communicated through social media platforms regarding orthognathic surgery was of poor to moderate quality. Orthodontic professionals should be aware of the limitations of health information on these online platforms and guide individuals to more accurate sources.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Orthodontics
International Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
71
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Une revue de référence dans le domaine de orthodontie et des disciplines frontières Your reference in dentofacial orthopedics International Orthodontics adresse aux orthodontistes, aux dentistes, aux stomatologistes, aux chirurgiens maxillo-faciaux et aux plasticiens de la face, ainsi quà leurs assistant(e)s. International Orthodontics is addressed to orthodontists, dentists, stomatologists, maxillofacial surgeons and facial plastic surgeons, as well as their assistants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信