Application of a novel gastro-laryngeal mask in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy surgery: A pilot randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Junfei Zhou, Lu Li, Chang Xu, Erxian Zhao, Jianjun Yang, Yunqi Lv
{"title":"Application of a novel gastro-laryngeal mask in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy surgery: A pilot randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Junfei Zhou, Lu Li, Chang Xu, Erxian Zhao, Jianjun Yang, Yunqi Lv","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Gastro-Laryngeal Mask (Jcerity Endoscoper<sup>TM</sup> Airway) is a new airway management technique utilized in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy surgery under general anesthesia, but evidence of its effectiveness and safety is scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the success rate of insertion, cardiovascular response, airway pressure, time taken for placement, nausea or vomiting, pharyngodynia, and other complications of using the new type of back-open gastroscopy laryngeal mask.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened 1401 patients; 105 were ineligible, and 40 declined to participate. Participants were randomly allocated into the Jcerity Endoscoper<sup>TM</sup> Airway (JEA) group and the endotracheal tube (ET) group. Among them, 1266 patients were randomly assigned to receive endotracheal intubation (n = 633) or JEA (n = 633).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the ET group, the JEA group had a significantly shorter insertion time and less cardiovascular response during insertion. The time taken for extubation after anesthesia and residence time in PACU in the JEA group was shorter than in the ET group. Especially, the incidence of pharyngodynia in the JEA group was lower than that in the ET group. The satisfaction of endoscopists with the JEA reached 99.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that the back-open JEA can not only provide a safe and effective airway guarantee for patients but also provide convenience for gastroenterologists to carry out endoscopic operations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered before patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Center (ChiCTR2100046864, principal investigator: Yunqi Lv, date of registration: 2021-05-29). The study was conducted in the painless diagnosis and treatment center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2021 to October 2023(Date of enrolment of the first research participant:2021-06-01).</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101456"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Gastro-Laryngeal Mask (Jcerity EndoscoperTM Airway) is a new airway management technique utilized in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy surgery under general anesthesia, but evidence of its effectiveness and safety is scarce.

Objective: To assess the success rate of insertion, cardiovascular response, airway pressure, time taken for placement, nausea or vomiting, pharyngodynia, and other complications of using the new type of back-open gastroscopy laryngeal mask.

Methods: We screened 1401 patients; 105 were ineligible, and 40 declined to participate. Participants were randomly allocated into the Jcerity EndoscoperTM Airway (JEA) group and the endotracheal tube (ET) group. Among them, 1266 patients were randomly assigned to receive endotracheal intubation (n = 633) or JEA (n = 633).

Results: Compared with the ET group, the JEA group had a significantly shorter insertion time and less cardiovascular response during insertion. The time taken for extubation after anesthesia and residence time in PACU in the JEA group was shorter than in the ET group. Especially, the incidence of pharyngodynia in the JEA group was lower than that in the ET group. The satisfaction of endoscopists with the JEA reached 99.4%.

Conclusions: This study showed that the back-open JEA can not only provide a safe and effective airway guarantee for patients but also provide convenience for gastroenterologists to carry out endoscopic operations.

Trial registration: The trial was registered before patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Center (ChiCTR2100046864, principal investigator: Yunqi Lv, date of registration: 2021-05-29). The study was conducted in the painless diagnosis and treatment center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2021 to October 2023(Date of enrolment of the first research participant:2021-06-01).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信