Analysis of dental anatomy knowledge among dental students: A preliminary study.

Q3 Medicine
M A A de Paiva, M A Benjamim, J H S Souza, D O Souza, M G B Trócoli, Á E F Alves, A F B De Oliveira
{"title":"Analysis of dental anatomy knowledge among dental students: A preliminary study.","authors":"M A A de Paiva, M A Benjamim, J H S Souza, D O Souza, M G B Trócoli, Á E F Alves, A F B De Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.morpho.2024.100945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the level of dental anatomy knowledge and visual acuity of dental students throughout their undergraduate course.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This descriptive, observational, and cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted over one year. Thirty-seven students, divided into three groups based on the time spent studying dental anatomy and carving, had their theoretical knowledge and visual acuity assessed using two questionnaires. The former was organized into two groups of questions: (1) related to the anatomy of anterior teeth, and (2) the anatomy of posterior teeth. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon test, and Spearman correlation (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was observed between sexes in the comparison of theoretical knowledge and photograph evaluation. Overall, participants performed similarly on both parts of the questionnaire about theoretical knowledge (anterior teeth group: 5.6±1.94; posterior teeth group: 5.7±2.32) with no statistical difference. There was no significant difference in the theoretical questionnaire results (P=0.615) or in the photograph evaluation (P=0.187) among the periods. In the intra-group comparison, P10 students scored higher in the photograph evaluation than in the theoretical questionnaire, showing a significant difference (P=0.027). No significant correlation was found between theoretical knowledge and sculpture evaluation (r=0.177; P=0.256).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limits of this study, it was concluded that students had similar performance in theoretical knowledge of anterior and posterior teeth. However, P10 students performed better in photograph evaluation than in the theoretical questionnaire, suggesting an improvement in practical skills throughout the course.</p>","PeriodicalId":39316,"journal":{"name":"Morphologie","volume":"109 365","pages":"100945"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Morphologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2024.100945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the level of dental anatomy knowledge and visual acuity of dental students throughout their undergraduate course.

Materials and methods: This descriptive, observational, and cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted over one year. Thirty-seven students, divided into three groups based on the time spent studying dental anatomy and carving, had their theoretical knowledge and visual acuity assessed using two questionnaires. The former was organized into two groups of questions: (1) related to the anatomy of anterior teeth, and (2) the anatomy of posterior teeth. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon test, and Spearman correlation (α=0.05).

Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between sexes in the comparison of theoretical knowledge and photograph evaluation. Overall, participants performed similarly on both parts of the questionnaire about theoretical knowledge (anterior teeth group: 5.6±1.94; posterior teeth group: 5.7±2.32) with no statistical difference. There was no significant difference in the theoretical questionnaire results (P=0.615) or in the photograph evaluation (P=0.187) among the periods. In the intra-group comparison, P10 students scored higher in the photograph evaluation than in the theoretical questionnaire, showing a significant difference (P=0.027). No significant correlation was found between theoretical knowledge and sculpture evaluation (r=0.177; P=0.256).

Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, it was concluded that students had similar performance in theoretical knowledge of anterior and posterior teeth. However, P10 students performed better in photograph evaluation than in the theoretical questionnaire, suggesting an improvement in practical skills throughout the course.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Morphologie
Morphologie Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Morphologie est une revue universitaire avec une ouverture médicale qui sa adresse aux enseignants, aux étudiants, aux chercheurs et aux cliniciens en anatomie et en morphologie. Vous y trouverez les développements les plus actuels de votre spécialité, en France comme a international. Le objectif de Morphologie est d?offrir des lectures privilégiées sous forme de revues générales, d?articles originaux, de mises au point didactiques et de revues de la littérature, qui permettront notamment aux enseignants de optimiser leurs cours et aux spécialistes d?enrichir leurs connaissances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信