Evaluation of nasal septum deviation via reformatted computed tomography (CT) imaging following expansion using RPE and MARPE.

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Diana Schron, Marrina Ran-Sukkawala, Elliott Pereira, Yan Zhang, Nicholas Hwang, In-Won Chang, Karla Lindquist, Ryan Williams, Julia Peng, Michael Nedjat-Haiem, Kevin Kang, Christine Hong, Audrey Yoon
{"title":"Evaluation of nasal septum deviation via reformatted computed tomography (CT) imaging following expansion using RPE and MARPE.","authors":"Diana Schron, Marrina Ran-Sukkawala, Elliott Pereira, Yan Zhang, Nicholas Hwang, In-Won Chang, Karla Lindquist, Ryan Williams, Julia Peng, Michael Nedjat-Haiem, Kevin Kang, Christine Hong, Audrey Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether rapid palatal expansion (RPE) or miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) affects nasal septum deviation (NSD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study population includes 22 RPE patients ages 9.62 ± 1.38 years and 20 MARPE patients ages 19.38 ± 7.82 years with initial diagnostic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans (T0). Another CBCT scan (T1) was taken after patients underwent RPE or MARPE expansion treatment alone. NSD was evaluated three-dimensionally using a custom landmark analysis on T0 and T1 CBCT scans. Principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical variate analysis (CVA) were used to identify nasal septum shape differences before and after expansion treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA and CVA showed that while there was change in nasal septum shape from T0 to T1 for MARPE and RPE treatments, the general pattern in morphological change was not found when comparing the variety of phenotypes between individuals. The Procrustes ANOVA regression found P-values for MARPE centroid size and shape were 0.7861 and 1, and RPE centroid size and shape were 0.3508 and 1, respectively, suggesting that there were no significant differences in nasal septum size and shape following expansion. CVA found P-values were 0.99 for MARPE and 0.99 for RPE after 10,000 permutation tests for Procrustes distances, indicating that there were no significant differences between T0 and T1 group means for both treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MARPE and RPE expansion treatments had no effect on nasal septum deviation from T0 to T1.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether rapid palatal expansion (RPE) or miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) affects nasal septum deviation (NSD).

Materials and methods: The study population includes 22 RPE patients ages 9.62 ± 1.38 years and 20 MARPE patients ages 19.38 ± 7.82 years with initial diagnostic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans (T0). Another CBCT scan (T1) was taken after patients underwent RPE or MARPE expansion treatment alone. NSD was evaluated three-dimensionally using a custom landmark analysis on T0 and T1 CBCT scans. Principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical variate analysis (CVA) were used to identify nasal septum shape differences before and after expansion treatment.

Results: PCA and CVA showed that while there was change in nasal septum shape from T0 to T1 for MARPE and RPE treatments, the general pattern in morphological change was not found when comparing the variety of phenotypes between individuals. The Procrustes ANOVA regression found P-values for MARPE centroid size and shape were 0.7861 and 1, and RPE centroid size and shape were 0.3508 and 1, respectively, suggesting that there were no significant differences in nasal septum size and shape following expansion. CVA found P-values were 0.99 for MARPE and 0.99 for RPE after 10,000 permutation tests for Procrustes distances, indicating that there were no significant differences between T0 and T1 group means for both treatment groups.

Conclusions: MARPE and RPE expansion treatments had no effect on nasal septum deviation from T0 to T1.

通过RPE和MARPE扩张后重新格式化计算机断层扫描(CT)评估鼻中隔偏曲。
目的:探讨快速腭扩张术(RPE)或微型辅助快速腭扩张术(MARPE)对鼻中隔偏曲(NSD)的影响。材料和方法:研究人群包括22例RPE患者(年龄9.62±1.38岁)和20例MARPE患者(年龄19.38±7.82岁),初始诊断为锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT) (T0)。患者单独接受RPE或MARPE扩张治疗后,再进行一次CBCT扫描(T1)。使用T0和T1 CBCT扫描的自定义地标分析对NSD进行三维评估。采用主成分分析(PCA)和典型变量分析(CVA)鉴定鼻中隔扩张治疗前后的形状差异。结果:PCA和CVA显示,虽然MARPE和RPE治疗后鼻中隔形状在T0至T1时有改变,但在比较个体间表型变化时,没有发现鼻中隔形态变化的一般规律。Procrustes方差分析发现,MARPE质心大小和形状的p值分别为0.7861和1,RPE质心大小和形状的p值分别为0.3508和1,表明扩张后鼻中隔大小和形状无显著差异。CVA发现,经过10,000次排列测试后,MARPE的p值为0.99,RPE的p值为0.99,表明两个治疗组的T0和T1组均值之间无显著差异。结论:从T0到T1, MARPE和RPE扩张治疗对鼻中隔偏曲无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信