Effectiveness of clear aligner versus removable inclined plane in treatment of anterior crossbite in mixed dentition: A randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Asmaa S Salem, Nehal F Albelasy, Ahmed A El-Bialy
{"title":"Effectiveness of clear aligner versus removable inclined plane in treatment of anterior crossbite in mixed dentition: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Asmaa S Salem, Nehal F Albelasy, Ahmed A El-Bialy","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of clear aligners and removable inclined planes (RIP) in management of anterior crossbite in late mixed dentition patients using a 3D digital model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four patients with functional anterior crossbite, aged 8 to 12 years old, were randomly assigned to two parallel groups: the clear aligner (CA) group with a mean age of 10.74 ± 1.1 years, treated with clear aligner, and the RIP group with a mean age of 10.54 ± 1.06 years. Digital models were obtained for each patient before (T0) and after 4 months of starting the treatment (T1) using an intraoral scanner. The T0 to T1 digital model was superimposed to assess the primary outcome, labial movement of the maxillary incisors. For each model, the following secondary outcomes were evaluated: overbite, intermolar width (IMW), incisor leveling, arch perimeter (AP), and mesiodistal angulation. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, paired t tests, independent t tests, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey's HSD test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between CA and RIP groups regarding overjet, overbite, incisor leveling, and mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary incisors (P < 0.05). However, a significant difference was found between two groups in IMW, AP, and incisor superimposition (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CA group showed a more significant increase in labial movement of maxillary incisors, IMW, and AP compared to the RIP group. However, both treatment protocols were effective in treating anterior crossbite. This study was recorded in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (identifier: NCT06015386).</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.11.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of clear aligners and removable inclined planes (RIP) in management of anterior crossbite in late mixed dentition patients using a 3D digital model.

Materials and methods: Twenty-four patients with functional anterior crossbite, aged 8 to 12 years old, were randomly assigned to two parallel groups: the clear aligner (CA) group with a mean age of 10.74 ± 1.1 years, treated with clear aligner, and the RIP group with a mean age of 10.54 ± 1.06 years. Digital models were obtained for each patient before (T0) and after 4 months of starting the treatment (T1) using an intraoral scanner. The T0 to T1 digital model was superimposed to assess the primary outcome, labial movement of the maxillary incisors. For each model, the following secondary outcomes were evaluated: overbite, intermolar width (IMW), incisor leveling, arch perimeter (AP), and mesiodistal angulation. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, paired t tests, independent t tests, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey's HSD test.

Results: There was no significant difference between CA and RIP groups regarding overjet, overbite, incisor leveling, and mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary incisors (P < 0.05). However, a significant difference was found between two groups in IMW, AP, and incisor superimposition (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The CA group showed a more significant increase in labial movement of maxillary incisors, IMW, and AP compared to the RIP group. However, both treatment protocols were effective in treating anterior crossbite. This study was recorded in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (identifier: NCT06015386).

透明矫正器与可移动斜面治疗混合牙列前牙合的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
背景:本研究旨在通过三维数字模型比较透明矫正器和可移动倾斜面(RIP)治疗晚期混合牙列患者前牙合的效果。材料与方法:将24例8 ~ 12岁的功能性前牙合患者随机分为两组,分别为CA组(平均年龄10.74±1.1岁)和RIP组(平均年龄10.54±1.06岁)。在开始治疗前(T0)和治疗后4个月(T1)使用口内扫描仪获得每位患者的数字模型。将T0与T1数字模型进行叠加,评估上颌切牙的主要预后、唇部运动。对于每个模型,评估以下次要结果:覆盖咬合,磨牙间宽度(IMW),切牙水平,弓周长(AP)和中远端成角。数据分析包括描述性统计、配对t检验、独立t检验、单因素方差分析和Tukey’s HSD检验。结果:CA组与RIP组在上颌切牙的上牙覆盖、上牙合、切牙水平、中、远端成角方面差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组间IMW、AP、切牙叠加量差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:与RIP组相比,CA组上颌切牙的唇部运动、内下颌、上下颌均明显增加。然而,两种治疗方法对治疗前牙合均有效。这项研究被记录在ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中(标识符:NCT06015386)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信