{"title":"Risk Stratification and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma: The Unmet Needs.","authors":"Chen Shen, Haoran Liu, Bofei Li, Jiaming Wang, Yiyang Wang, Feichao Bao, Zhitao Gu, Wentao Fang","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.15521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To identify high-risk patients for recurrence in resected stage IA lung adenocarcinoma and evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on their prognosis, as well as explore potential novel adjuvant therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive stage IA patients with ≥ 5% solid or micropapillary subtypes were analyzed. A nomogram was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS). In the high-risk group after stratification, RFS was compared between patients receiving ACT and those under observation, as well as between patients with and without driver gene alterations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This real-world study included 1328 patients, with a 5-year RFS of 79.0%. T stage and predominant subtype were independent risk factors for RFS. Patients with T1c or solid/micropapillary-predominant tumors were stratified into a high-risk group (n = 483) using the nomogram. A significant difference in 5-year RFS was observed between the high- and low-risk groups (73.6% vs. 84.3%, p < 0.001). Among high-risk patients, sixty-seven (13.8%) received ACT; however, there was no improvement in 5-year RFS compared to observation alone (69.1% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.655). Testing rates for EGFR mutation and ALK fusion among high-risk patients were only 52.4% and 43.9%, respectively, while mutation rates reached up to 55.7% and 9.4%, respectively. These molecular alterations exhibited numerically worse 5-year RFS compared to wild-type (EGFR mutation, 70.6% vs. 87.8%, p = 0.108; ALK fusion, 66.3% vs. 73.6%, p = 0.404), though not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACT failed to meet the needs of stage IA patients with histological high-risk features. Further exploration of effective adjuvant target therapies is warranted for this patient subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: To identify high-risk patients for recurrence in resected stage IA lung adenocarcinoma and evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on their prognosis, as well as explore potential novel adjuvant therapies.
Methods: Consecutive stage IA patients with ≥ 5% solid or micropapillary subtypes were analyzed. A nomogram was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS). In the high-risk group after stratification, RFS was compared between patients receiving ACT and those under observation, as well as between patients with and without driver gene alterations.
Results: This real-world study included 1328 patients, with a 5-year RFS of 79.0%. T stage and predominant subtype were independent risk factors for RFS. Patients with T1c or solid/micropapillary-predominant tumors were stratified into a high-risk group (n = 483) using the nomogram. A significant difference in 5-year RFS was observed between the high- and low-risk groups (73.6% vs. 84.3%, p < 0.001). Among high-risk patients, sixty-seven (13.8%) received ACT; however, there was no improvement in 5-year RFS compared to observation alone (69.1% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.655). Testing rates for EGFR mutation and ALK fusion among high-risk patients were only 52.4% and 43.9%, respectively, while mutation rates reached up to 55.7% and 9.4%, respectively. These molecular alterations exhibited numerically worse 5-year RFS compared to wild-type (EGFR mutation, 70.6% vs. 87.8%, p = 0.108; ALK fusion, 66.3% vs. 73.6%, p = 0.404), though not significant.
Conclusions: ACT failed to meet the needs of stage IA patients with histological high-risk features. Further exploration of effective adjuvant target therapies is warranted for this patient subgroup.
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.