Enhancing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor with photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: A meta-analysis.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ting-Han Lin, Hung-Yi Lin, Po-Chen Tseng
{"title":"Enhancing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor with photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Ting-Han Lin, Hung-Yi Lin, Po-Chen Tseng","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents administered as either monotherapy or combination with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) are the 2 dominant treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV); However, controversies remain due to small sample sizes and inconsistency in prognosis from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In accordance with the PRISMA statement, we investigated the efficacy of PDT plus anti-VEGF combination with anti-VEGF monotherapy. This study was accepted by the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023471362). Studies published up to July, 2024, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A total of 7 RCTs with 926 eyes were reviewed. In 6 trials, combination therapy showed significantly higher rate of complete polyp regression (risk ratio [RR]: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.15-2.13, p = 0.005). In 5 trials, combination therapy also significantly reduced the number of anti-VEGF injections (SMD: -0.65, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.35, p < 0.0001). For best corrected visual acuity improvement, central retinal thickness reduction, and rate of ocular adverse events, the performance of the 2 modalities were comparable. We conclude that PDT plus anti-VEGF combination therapy constitutes a safe and effective modality and should be considered the first-line treatment for PCV.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.12.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents administered as either monotherapy or combination with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) are the 2 dominant treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV); However, controversies remain due to small sample sizes and inconsistency in prognosis from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In accordance with the PRISMA statement, we investigated the efficacy of PDT plus anti-VEGF combination with anti-VEGF monotherapy. This study was accepted by the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023471362). Studies published up to July, 2024, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A total of 7 RCTs with 926 eyes were reviewed. In 6 trials, combination therapy showed significantly higher rate of complete polyp regression (risk ratio [RR]: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.15-2.13, p = 0.005). In 5 trials, combination therapy also significantly reduced the number of anti-VEGF injections (SMD: -0.65, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.35, p < 0.0001). For best corrected visual acuity improvement, central retinal thickness reduction, and rate of ocular adverse events, the performance of the 2 modalities were comparable. We conclude that PDT plus anti-VEGF combination therapy constitutes a safe and effective modality and should be considered the first-line treatment for PCV.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信