{"title":"The effects of feedback and task accuracy in serial dependence to orientation.","authors":"Zoë Little, Colin W G Clifford","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assimilative serial dependence in perception occurs where responses about a stimulus (e.g., orientation) are biased towards previously seen perceptual information (e.g., the orientation of the stimulus shown on the previous trial). This bias may occur to perceptual information from the previous trial, or to the response or decision made on the previous trial. We asked whether providing response feedback could change the serial dependence effect on the following trial. Twenty-one participants completed a task in which they adjusted an on-screen pointer to reproduce the orientation of a briefly-presented Gabor stimulus. They received feedback about the accuracy of their response that either reflected their actual accuracy or was random. We found significant positive biases to the stimulus and response only when the participant had received positive (\"correct!\") feedback on that trial. When the inducer response had been incorrect, the effect was significant only to the response itself and not to the stimulus. Overall, we suggest that our participants demonstrated a bias towards the percept from the previous trial, which is better represented by the response than the stimulus for incorrect trials, and that this effect can be modulated post-perceptually by feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"227 ","pages":"108536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2024.108536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Assimilative serial dependence in perception occurs where responses about a stimulus (e.g., orientation) are biased towards previously seen perceptual information (e.g., the orientation of the stimulus shown on the previous trial). This bias may occur to perceptual information from the previous trial, or to the response or decision made on the previous trial. We asked whether providing response feedback could change the serial dependence effect on the following trial. Twenty-one participants completed a task in which they adjusted an on-screen pointer to reproduce the orientation of a briefly-presented Gabor stimulus. They received feedback about the accuracy of their response that either reflected their actual accuracy or was random. We found significant positive biases to the stimulus and response only when the participant had received positive ("correct!") feedback on that trial. When the inducer response had been incorrect, the effect was significant only to the response itself and not to the stimulus. Overall, we suggest that our participants demonstrated a bias towards the percept from the previous trial, which is better represented by the response than the stimulus for incorrect trials, and that this effect can be modulated post-perceptually by feedback.
期刊介绍:
Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.