Trends and impact of endoscopic ultrasound utilization for suspected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Lillian Wang, Priyanka Vatsavayi, Shounak Majumder, Ferga C Gleeson, Elizabeth Rajan, Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Andrew C Storm, Shifa Umar, Saran T Velaga, William S Harmsen, Santhi S Vege, Vinay Chandrasekhara
{"title":"Trends and impact of endoscopic ultrasound utilization for suspected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.","authors":"Lillian Wang, Priyanka Vatsavayi, Shounak Majumder, Ferga C Gleeson, Elizabeth Rajan, Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Andrew C Storm, Shifa Umar, Saran T Velaga, William S Harmsen, Santhi S Vege, Vinay Chandrasekhara","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple management guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) have been published to improve risk stratification and resource utilization. This study aims to evaluate trends in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) use and agreement between cross-sectional imaging and EUS for specific pancreas cystic lesion (PCL) features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adults undergoing EUS for suspected IPMN detected with cross-sectional imaging (CT/MRCP) between 2013 and 2015 (Cohort 1) and 2018-2020 (Cohort 2). Clinical, radiographic, EUS, cytologic, and outcomes data were collected. IPMN were defined as high-risk/worrisome (having any Fukuoka high risk (HR) or worrisome feature (WF)), low risk (cyst size 10-29.9 mm, without Fukuoka HR or WF), or very low risk (cyst size <10 mm, without Fukuoka HR or WF). Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kappa statistics were used. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed via post-hoc sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 711 patients, 292 (41.1 %) were in Cohort 1. More patients in Cohort 1 underwent EUS for non-high risk/non-worrisome PCL on pre-EUS imaging (65.8 % vs. 54.9 %, P < 0.01). Good agreement between pre-EUS imaging and EUS for WF (84.1 %) and HR (96.6 %) was seen. EUS-FNA impacted surveillance and surgical referral in 29.5 % (P = 0.51). Median surveillance duration was 917 days (IQR 367, 1439 days), during which pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was diagnosed in 7.5 % (P = 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this series EUS over-utilization for low risk IPMN improved over time reflecting more conservative guidelines, without changing PDAC diagnosis rates. There was good agreement between cross-sectional imaging and EUS for specific PCL features.</p>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2024.12.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple management guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) have been published to improve risk stratification and resource utilization. This study aims to evaluate trends in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) use and agreement between cross-sectional imaging and EUS for specific pancreas cystic lesion (PCL) features.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adults undergoing EUS for suspected IPMN detected with cross-sectional imaging (CT/MRCP) between 2013 and 2015 (Cohort 1) and 2018-2020 (Cohort 2). Clinical, radiographic, EUS, cytologic, and outcomes data were collected. IPMN were defined as high-risk/worrisome (having any Fukuoka high risk (HR) or worrisome feature (WF)), low risk (cyst size 10-29.9 mm, without Fukuoka HR or WF), or very low risk (cyst size <10 mm, without Fukuoka HR or WF). Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kappa statistics were used. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed via post-hoc sensitivity analysis.

Results: Of 711 patients, 292 (41.1 %) were in Cohort 1. More patients in Cohort 1 underwent EUS for non-high risk/non-worrisome PCL on pre-EUS imaging (65.8 % vs. 54.9 %, P < 0.01). Good agreement between pre-EUS imaging and EUS for WF (84.1 %) and HR (96.6 %) was seen. EUS-FNA impacted surveillance and surgical referral in 29.5 % (P = 0.51). Median surveillance duration was 917 days (IQR 367, 1439 days), during which pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was diagnosed in 7.5 % (P = 0.11).

Conclusions: In this series EUS over-utilization for low risk IPMN improved over time reflecting more conservative guidelines, without changing PDAC diagnosis rates. There was good agreement between cross-sectional imaging and EUS for specific PCL features.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信