Corticospinal excitability is not facilitated by observation of asymmetric walking on a split-belt treadmill in humans.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroreport Pub Date : 2025-02-05 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1097/WNR.0000000000002129
Masaya Kitamura, Tadao Ishikura, Kiyotaka Kamibayashi
{"title":"Corticospinal excitability is not facilitated by observation of asymmetric walking on a split-belt treadmill in humans.","authors":"Masaya Kitamura, Tadao Ishikura, Kiyotaka Kamibayashi","doi":"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to investigate changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE) by observing unnatural walking patterns on a treadmill with different left and right belt speeds. Fifteen healthy adults watched video clips (10 s each) of walking under the tied condition (left and right treadmill belt speeds are the same), walking during the initial and late periods under the split-belt condition (left and right treadmill belt speeds are different), and the static fixation cross (control condition) in random order. The step lengths of the actor in the walking clips were almost symmetric under the tied condition and during the late period under the split-belt condition but largely asymmetric during the initial period under the split-belt condition. We recorded the motor-evoked potential (MEP) of the left tibialis anterior muscle during the observation of video clips by delivering transcranial magnetic stimulation to the right primary motor cortex. The MEP amplitude was significantly higher when observing walking under the tied condition and walking during the late period under the split-belt condition than the control condition. However, the MEP amplitudes during the observation of walking during the initial period under the split-belt condition and the control condition were not significantly different. These results indicate that observation of symmetric walking, even under the split-belt condition, facilitates CSE, whereas observation of unnatural asymmetric walking does not. Therefore, it is suggested that familiarity with observed movements affects CSE even in the observation of semi-automatic movements such as walking.</p>","PeriodicalId":19213,"journal":{"name":"Neuroreport","volume":" ","pages":"140-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroreport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE) by observing unnatural walking patterns on a treadmill with different left and right belt speeds. Fifteen healthy adults watched video clips (10 s each) of walking under the tied condition (left and right treadmill belt speeds are the same), walking during the initial and late periods under the split-belt condition (left and right treadmill belt speeds are different), and the static fixation cross (control condition) in random order. The step lengths of the actor in the walking clips were almost symmetric under the tied condition and during the late period under the split-belt condition but largely asymmetric during the initial period under the split-belt condition. We recorded the motor-evoked potential (MEP) of the left tibialis anterior muscle during the observation of video clips by delivering transcranial magnetic stimulation to the right primary motor cortex. The MEP amplitude was significantly higher when observing walking under the tied condition and walking during the late period under the split-belt condition than the control condition. However, the MEP amplitudes during the observation of walking during the initial period under the split-belt condition and the control condition were not significantly different. These results indicate that observation of symmetric walking, even under the split-belt condition, facilitates CSE, whereas observation of unnatural asymmetric walking does not. Therefore, it is suggested that familiarity with observed movements affects CSE even in the observation of semi-automatic movements such as walking.

皮质脊髓兴奋性不促进观察不对称行走在分裂带跑步机上的人。
本研究旨在通过观察在不同左右带速的跑步机上的非自然步行模式来研究皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)的变化。15名健康成人按随机顺序观看捆绑状态(左右跑步机带速度相同)、分带状态(左右跑步机带速度不同)初始和后期行走、静态固定交叉(对照)的视频片段(各10 s)。在捆扎条件下和分带条件下,演员在行走片段中的步长几乎是对称的,而在分带条件下,演员在初始阶段的步长基本上是不对称的。我们通过经颅磁刺激右初级运动皮层,记录了观察视频片段时左胫骨前肌的运动诱发电位。捆绑行走和分带行走后期的MEP幅值明显高于对照组。而分带组与对照组步行观察初期的MEP幅值无显著差异。这些结果表明,即使在裂带条件下,对称行走的观测也有利于CSE,而非非对称行走的观测则不利于CSE。因此,我们认为熟悉观察到的运动甚至在观察半自动运动(如步行)时也会影响CSE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroreport
Neuroreport 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: NeuroReport is a channel for rapid communication of new findings in neuroscience. It is a forum for the publication of short but complete reports of important studies that require very fast publication. Papers are accepted on the basis of the novelty of their finding, on their significance for neuroscience and on a clear need for rapid publication. Preliminary communications are not suitable for the Journal. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. The core interest of the Journal is on studies that cast light on how the brain (and the whole of the nervous system) works. We aim to give authors a decision on their submission within 2-5 weeks, and all accepted articles appear in the next issue to press.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信