Associations between momentary mental states and concurrent social functioning after remission from first episode psychosis: A HAMLETT ecological momentary assessment study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychiatric research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.002
Matej Djordjevic, Hannah E Jongsma, Claudia J P Simons, Priscilla P Oomen, Lieuwe de Haan, Nynke Boonstra, Martijn Kikkert, Sanne Koops, Chris N W Geraets, Marieke J H Begemann, Machteld Marcelis, Wim Veling
{"title":"Associations between momentary mental states and concurrent social functioning after remission from first episode psychosis: A HAMLETT ecological momentary assessment study.","authors":"Matej Djordjevic, Hannah E Jongsma, Claudia J P Simons, Priscilla P Oomen, Lieuwe de Haan, Nynke Boonstra, Martijn Kikkert, Sanne Koops, Chris N W Geraets, Marieke J H Begemann, Machteld Marcelis, Wim Veling","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptom severity and social functioning are important outcomes after first episode psychosis (FEP), yet current evidence about associations between them is inconsistent and lacks (subclinical) momentary insights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) study was conducted in 58 people in remission from FEP, as part of the HAMLETT (Handling Antipsychotic Medication: Long-term Evaluation of Targeted Treatment) trial. At baseline, participants were prompted to report momentary mental states and social context 10x/day for eight consecutive days, including psychotic experiences (PEs), motivation/drive and negative affect, that may indicate proxies of (subclinical) psychotic, negative and general affective symptoms, respectively. We employed multilevel mixed-effects regressions to investigate associations between self-reported mental states and concurrent activity or social company and subjective appraisal thereof. We also conducted retrospective clinical assessments of symptoms (PANSS) and social functioning (WHODAS 2.0) and investigated their cross-sectional associations using multivariable linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses of 3101 EMA-questionnaires showed that lower motivation/drive was associated with more passive activity and less company (OR = 0.96 [95%CI: 0.96; 0.97], OR = 0.95 [95%CI: 0.93; 0.96], N.B. ORs per 1-point symptom-score change). PEs and negative affect were associated with more proactive activity (OR = 1.02 [95%CI: 1.00; 1.03], OR = 1.02 [95%CI: 1.01; 1.03]). All three mental state domains were associated with lower activity appraisal overall, though activity-specific associations differed. PEs and negative affect were associated with lower company appraisal (B = -0.25 [95%CI: -0.36; -0.14], B = -0.15 [95%CI: -0.23; -0.06]). When assessed retrospectively, only PANSS general psychopathology was associated with poorer social functioning (B = 2.52 [95%CI: 1.69; 3.34]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-reported PEs, momentary motivation/drive and general affective symptoms are associated with daily-life functioning after remission from FEP. Retrospective observer-rated and momentary self-report assessment methods do not measure the same aspects or intensity of psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"181 ","pages":"560-569"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Symptom severity and social functioning are important outcomes after first episode psychosis (FEP), yet current evidence about associations between them is inconsistent and lacks (subclinical) momentary insights.

Methods: The current Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) study was conducted in 58 people in remission from FEP, as part of the HAMLETT (Handling Antipsychotic Medication: Long-term Evaluation of Targeted Treatment) trial. At baseline, participants were prompted to report momentary mental states and social context 10x/day for eight consecutive days, including psychotic experiences (PEs), motivation/drive and negative affect, that may indicate proxies of (subclinical) psychotic, negative and general affective symptoms, respectively. We employed multilevel mixed-effects regressions to investigate associations between self-reported mental states and concurrent activity or social company and subjective appraisal thereof. We also conducted retrospective clinical assessments of symptoms (PANSS) and social functioning (WHODAS 2.0) and investigated their cross-sectional associations using multivariable linear regression.

Results: Analyses of 3101 EMA-questionnaires showed that lower motivation/drive was associated with more passive activity and less company (OR = 0.96 [95%CI: 0.96; 0.97], OR = 0.95 [95%CI: 0.93; 0.96], N.B. ORs per 1-point symptom-score change). PEs and negative affect were associated with more proactive activity (OR = 1.02 [95%CI: 1.00; 1.03], OR = 1.02 [95%CI: 1.01; 1.03]). All three mental state domains were associated with lower activity appraisal overall, though activity-specific associations differed. PEs and negative affect were associated with lower company appraisal (B = -0.25 [95%CI: -0.36; -0.14], B = -0.15 [95%CI: -0.23; -0.06]). When assessed retrospectively, only PANSS general psychopathology was associated with poorer social functioning (B = 2.52 [95%CI: 1.69; 3.34]).

Conclusion: Self-reported PEs, momentary motivation/drive and general affective symptoms are associated with daily-life functioning after remission from FEP. Retrospective observer-rated and momentary self-report assessment methods do not measure the same aspects or intensity of psychopathology.

首次精神病缓解后瞬时精神状态与并发社会功能之间的关系:一项HAMLETT生态瞬时评估研究。
背景:症状严重程度和社会功能是首发精神病(FEP)后的重要结果,但目前关于它们之间关联的证据不一致,并且缺乏(亚临床)瞬间的见解。方法:目前的生态瞬时评估(EMA)研究在58名FEP缓解患者中进行,作为HAMLETT(处理抗精神病药物:靶向治疗的长期评估)试验的一部分。在基线时,参与者被提示连续8天每天10次报告瞬时精神状态和社会环境,包括精神病经历(PEs)、动机/驱动和消极情绪,这可能分别表明(亚临床)精神病、消极和一般情感症状的代理。我们采用多层次混合效应回归来调查自我报告的心理状态与同时活动或社会陪伴及其主观评价之间的关系。我们还对症状(PANSS)和社会功能(WHODAS 2.0)进行了回顾性临床评估,并使用多变量线性回归研究了它们的横断面相关性。结果:对3101份ema问卷的分析表明,较低的动机/驱动力与更多的被动活动和较少的陪伴相关(OR = 0.96 [95%CI: 0.96;0.97], or = 0.95 [95%ci: 0.93;0.96], N.B. or(每1分症状评分变化)。pe和负面情绪与更积极的活动相关(OR = 1.02 [95%CI: 1.00;1.03], or = 1.02 [95%ci: 1.01;1.03])。这三种精神状态域总体上都与较低的活动评估相关,尽管活动特定的关联有所不同。pe和负面情绪与较低的公司评价相关(B = -0.25 [95%CI: -0.36;-0.14], b = -0.15 [95%ci: -0.23;-0.06])。回顾性评估时,只有PANSS一般精神病理与较差的社会功能相关(B = 2.52 [95%CI: 1.69;3.34])。结论:自我报告的pe、瞬时动机/驱动力和一般情感症状与FEP缓解后的日常生活功能有关。回顾性观察评定和瞬间自我报告评估方法不测量精神病理学的相同方面或强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信