Left Ventricular Energetics in Patients Receiving Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Rajat Kalra, Christopher Gaisendrees, Tamas Alexy, Marinos Kosmopoulos, Sebastian Voicu, Jason A Bartos, Sergey G Gurevich, Ganesh Raveendran, Deborah Jaeger, Despoina Koukousaki, Andrea M Elliott, Alejandra Gutierrez Bernal, Mark Dennis, Brian Burns, Demetris Yannopoulos
{"title":"Left Ventricular Energetics in Patients Receiving Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.","authors":"Rajat Kalra, Christopher Gaisendrees, Tamas Alexy, Marinos Kosmopoulos, Sebastian Voicu, Jason A Bartos, Sergey G Gurevich, Ganesh Raveendran, Deborah Jaeger, Despoina Koukousaki, Andrea M Elliott, Alejandra Gutierrez Bernal, Mark Dennis, Brian Burns, Demetris Yannopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The haemodynamic effects veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remain inadequately understood. We investigated invasive left ventricular (LV) haemodynamics in patients who underwent treatment with an intensive care strategy involving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted invasive haemodynamic assessments on 15 patients who underwent ECPR and achieved return of spontaneous circulation. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and stroke work (LVSW) were evaluated using simultaneous invasive left heart catheterization and 3D echocardiography. Paired comparisons between high and low VA-ECMO flow were performed. Metrics were also compared between survivors and non-survivors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Invasive haemodynamic studies were performed in 15 patients aged 58 (43,65) years at 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) days after cannulation. Six patients survived the index hospitalization, and 9 expired during the index hospitalization. Among the total cohort, transitioning from the highest VA-ECMO flow (median 4.0L/min) to the lowest VA-ECMO flow (median 2.0 L/min) led to increases in LVEDV from 85 (68,125) mL to 106 (70,153) mL (p=0.005) and LVEDP from 14 (8,23) mmHg to 17 (12,30) mmHg (p=0.001), respectively. Similarly, the LVSW increased from 2051±1525 mL*mmHg at the highest level of VA-ECMO flow to 2627±1559 at the lowest VA-ECMO flow (p=0.01). Although all patients had directionally similar changes, patients who survived the index hospitalization had higher LVEF at the lowest VA-ECMO flow and lower LVEDV and LVEDP compared to patients who expired (all p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High VA-ECMO flow significantly reduced LVEDP, LVEDV, and LVSW compared to low VA-ECMO flow, irrespective of survival status.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110475"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110475","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The haemodynamic effects veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remain inadequately understood. We investigated invasive left ventricular (LV) haemodynamics in patients who underwent treatment with an intensive care strategy involving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

Methods: We conducted invasive haemodynamic assessments on 15 patients who underwent ECPR and achieved return of spontaneous circulation. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and stroke work (LVSW) were evaluated using simultaneous invasive left heart catheterization and 3D echocardiography. Paired comparisons between high and low VA-ECMO flow were performed. Metrics were also compared between survivors and non-survivors.

Results: Invasive haemodynamic studies were performed in 15 patients aged 58 (43,65) years at 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) days after cannulation. Six patients survived the index hospitalization, and 9 expired during the index hospitalization. Among the total cohort, transitioning from the highest VA-ECMO flow (median 4.0L/min) to the lowest VA-ECMO flow (median 2.0 L/min) led to increases in LVEDV from 85 (68,125) mL to 106 (70,153) mL (p=0.005) and LVEDP from 14 (8,23) mmHg to 17 (12,30) mmHg (p=0.001), respectively. Similarly, the LVSW increased from 2051±1525 mL*mmHg at the highest level of VA-ECMO flow to 2627±1559 at the lowest VA-ECMO flow (p=0.01). Although all patients had directionally similar changes, patients who survived the index hospitalization had higher LVEF at the lowest VA-ECMO flow and lower LVEDV and LVEDP compared to patients who expired (all p<0.05).

Conclusion: High VA-ECMO flow significantly reduced LVEDP, LVEDV, and LVSW compared to low VA-ECMO flow, irrespective of survival status.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信