Benjamin Orkild, K M Arefeen Sultan, Eugene Kholmovski, Eugene Kwan, Erik Bieging, Alan Morris, Greg Stoddard, Rob S MacLeod, Shireen Elhabian, Ravi Ranjan, Ed DiBella
{"title":"Image quality assessment and automation in late gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the left atrium in atrial fibrillation patients.","authors":"Benjamin Orkild, K M Arefeen Sultan, Eugene Kholmovski, Eugene Kwan, Erik Bieging, Alan Morris, Greg Stoddard, Rob S MacLeod, Shireen Elhabian, Ravi Ranjan, Ed DiBella","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01971-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) MRI has become a widely used technique to non-invasively image the left atrium prior to catheter ablation. However, LGE-MRI images are prone to variable image quality, with quality metrics that do not necessarily correlate to the image's diagnostic quality. In this study, we aimed to define consistent clinically relevant metrics for image and diagnostic quality in 3D LGE-MRI images of the left atrium, have multiple observers assess LGE-MRI image quality to identify key features that measure quality and intra/inter-observer variabilities, and train and test a CNN to assess image quality automatically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified four image quality categories that impact fibrosis assessment in LGE-MRI images and trained individuals to score 50 consecutive pre-ablation atrial fibrillation LGE-MRI scans from the University of Utah hospital image database. The trained individuals then scored 146 additional scans, which were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to assess diagnostic quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was excellent agreement among trained observers when scoring LGE-MRI scans, with inter-rater reliability scores ranging from 0.65 to 0.76 for each category. When the quality scores were converted to a binary diagnostic/non-diagnostic, the CNN achieved a sensitivity of <math><mrow><mn>0.80</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.06</mn></mrow> </math> and a specificity of <math><mrow><mn>0.56</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.10</mn></mrow> </math> .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a training document with reference examples helped raters achieve excellent agreement in their quality scores. The CNN gave a reasonably accurate classification of diagnostic or non-diagnostic 3D LGE-MRI images of the left atrium, despite the use of a relatively small training set.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01971-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) MRI has become a widely used technique to non-invasively image the left atrium prior to catheter ablation. However, LGE-MRI images are prone to variable image quality, with quality metrics that do not necessarily correlate to the image's diagnostic quality. In this study, we aimed to define consistent clinically relevant metrics for image and diagnostic quality in 3D LGE-MRI images of the left atrium, have multiple observers assess LGE-MRI image quality to identify key features that measure quality and intra/inter-observer variabilities, and train and test a CNN to assess image quality automatically.
Methods: We identified four image quality categories that impact fibrosis assessment in LGE-MRI images and trained individuals to score 50 consecutive pre-ablation atrial fibrillation LGE-MRI scans from the University of Utah hospital image database. The trained individuals then scored 146 additional scans, which were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to assess diagnostic quality.
Results: There was excellent agreement among trained observers when scoring LGE-MRI scans, with inter-rater reliability scores ranging from 0.65 to 0.76 for each category. When the quality scores were converted to a binary diagnostic/non-diagnostic, the CNN achieved a sensitivity of and a specificity of .
Conclusion: The use of a training document with reference examples helped raters achieve excellent agreement in their quality scores. The CNN gave a reasonably accurate classification of diagnostic or non-diagnostic 3D LGE-MRI images of the left atrium, despite the use of a relatively small training set.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.