Image quality assessment and automation in late gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the left atrium in atrial fibrillation patients.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Benjamin Orkild, K M Arefeen Sultan, Eugene Kholmovski, Eugene Kwan, Erik Bieging, Alan Morris, Greg Stoddard, Rob S MacLeod, Shireen Elhabian, Ravi Ranjan, Ed DiBella
{"title":"Image quality assessment and automation in late gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the left atrium in atrial fibrillation patients.","authors":"Benjamin Orkild, K M Arefeen Sultan, Eugene Kholmovski, Eugene Kwan, Erik Bieging, Alan Morris, Greg Stoddard, Rob S MacLeod, Shireen Elhabian, Ravi Ranjan, Ed DiBella","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01971-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) MRI has become a widely used technique to non-invasively image the left atrium prior to catheter ablation. However, LGE-MRI images are prone to variable image quality, with quality metrics that do not necessarily correlate to the image's diagnostic quality. In this study, we aimed to define consistent clinically relevant metrics for image and diagnostic quality in 3D LGE-MRI images of the left atrium, have multiple observers assess LGE-MRI image quality to identify key features that measure quality and intra/inter-observer variabilities, and train and test a CNN to assess image quality automatically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified four image quality categories that impact fibrosis assessment in LGE-MRI images and trained individuals to score 50 consecutive pre-ablation atrial fibrillation LGE-MRI scans from the University of Utah hospital image database. The trained individuals then scored 146 additional scans, which were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to assess diagnostic quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was excellent agreement among trained observers when scoring LGE-MRI scans, with inter-rater reliability scores ranging from 0.65 to 0.76 for each category. When the quality scores were converted to a binary diagnostic/non-diagnostic, the CNN achieved a sensitivity of <math><mrow><mn>0.80</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.06</mn></mrow> </math> and a specificity of <math><mrow><mn>0.56</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.10</mn></mrow> </math> .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a training document with reference examples helped raters achieve excellent agreement in their quality scores. The CNN gave a reasonably accurate classification of diagnostic or non-diagnostic 3D LGE-MRI images of the left atrium, despite the use of a relatively small training set.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01971-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) MRI has become a widely used technique to non-invasively image the left atrium prior to catheter ablation. However, LGE-MRI images are prone to variable image quality, with quality metrics that do not necessarily correlate to the image's diagnostic quality. In this study, we aimed to define consistent clinically relevant metrics for image and diagnostic quality in 3D LGE-MRI images of the left atrium, have multiple observers assess LGE-MRI image quality to identify key features that measure quality and intra/inter-observer variabilities, and train and test a CNN to assess image quality automatically.

Methods: We identified four image quality categories that impact fibrosis assessment in LGE-MRI images and trained individuals to score 50 consecutive pre-ablation atrial fibrillation LGE-MRI scans from the University of Utah hospital image database. The trained individuals then scored 146 additional scans, which were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to assess diagnostic quality.

Results: There was excellent agreement among trained observers when scoring LGE-MRI scans, with inter-rater reliability scores ranging from 0.65 to 0.76 for each category. When the quality scores were converted to a binary diagnostic/non-diagnostic, the CNN achieved a sensitivity of 0.80 ± 0.06 and a specificity of 0.56 ± 0.10 .

Conclusion: The use of a training document with reference examples helped raters achieve excellent agreement in their quality scores. The CNN gave a reasonably accurate classification of diagnostic or non-diagnostic 3D LGE-MRI images of the left atrium, despite the use of a relatively small training set.

房颤患者左心房晚期钆增强MRI图像质量评估与自动化。
背景:晚期钆增强(LGE) MRI已成为一种广泛应用于导管消融前左心房无创成像的技术。然而,大磁共振成像图像容易出现图像质量变化,其质量指标不一定与图像的诊断质量相关。在本研究中,我们旨在为左心房3D LGE-MRI图像的图像和诊断质量定义一致的临床相关指标,让多个观察者评估LGE-MRI图像质量,以识别测量质量和观察者内部/之间变量的关键特征,并训练和测试CNN来自动评估图像质量。方法:我们确定了影响LGE-MRI图像纤维化评估的四个图像质量类别,并训练个体从犹他大学医院图像数据库中对50个连续消融前房颤LGE-MRI扫描进行评分。然后,经过训练的个体进行了146次额外的扫描,这些扫描被用来训练卷积神经网络(CNN)来评估诊断质量。结果:训练有素的观察者在对大磁共振成像扫描进行评分时,有非常好的一致性,每个类别的评分可信度评分范围为0.65至0.76。当质量分数转换为二元诊断/非诊断时,CNN的灵敏度为0.80±0.06,特异性为0.56±0.10。结论:使用带有参考示例的训练文档帮助评分者在质量分数上达到极好的一致性。CNN对左心房的诊断性或非诊断性3D LGE-MRI图像进行了相当准确的分类,尽管使用了相对较小的训练集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信