State-Level Structural Racism and Children's Dental Care Access and Oral Health.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A M Kranz, L A Evans, C Gadwah-Meaden, Kimberley H Geissler
{"title":"State-Level Structural Racism and Children's Dental Care Access and Oral Health.","authors":"A M Kranz, L A Evans, C Gadwah-Meaden, Kimberley H Geissler","doi":"10.1177/23800844241308149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Black children in the United States have lower rates of dental visits and higher rates of poor oral health. However, few studies have examined the role of structural racism as a contributor to racial gaps in children's oral health. This study assessed associations between state-level structural racism and oral health outcomes of children and the related Black-White disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This repeated cross-sectional observational study examined children aged 1 to 17 y in the 2016 to 2021 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). Three outcomes were examined: utilization (dentist visit in past 12 mo), any oral health problem (difficulty in past 12 mo with bleeding gums, cavities, or toothaches), and oral health (teeth in excellent or very good condition). A state-level index was constructed to measure Black-White structural racism composed of 5 dimensions (judicial, educational, economic, political, and neighborhood segregation) and linked to the NSCH. Estimated population-weighted logit regression models were used to assess associations between the outcomes and race and structural racism, adjusting for demographics and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dataset consisted of 98,423 Black (11%) or White (88%) children. Black children had relatively worse outcomes than White children did, with the largest difference observed for the children having teeth in excellent or very good condition (73% vs. 83%). State-level structural racism was not statistically significantly associated with a child receiving dental care, having any oral health problem, or having teeth in excellent or very good condition. US Black-White disparities in these outcomes were unchanged after adjustment for state-level structural racism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expanded efforts are needed to address US Black-White disparities in child oral health outcomes. State-level structural racism was not associated with these outcomes. Future research should explore whether findings change when examining these associations at a different geographic level and whether indices of structural racism should explicitly include items specific to health care access and child-specific institutional domains.</p><p><strong>Knowledge transfer statement: </strong>Black children in this US study had relatively worse oral health and were less likely to have a dental visit than White children were. Structural racism did not explain these disparities, which suggests the need for further research to study mechanisms driving these disparities and how to address them. Policy makers should consider policies that expand where care is delivered, who delivers care, and increase dentists' Medicaid participation, strategies identified previously for reducing disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14783,"journal":{"name":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"23800844241308149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844241308149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Black children in the United States have lower rates of dental visits and higher rates of poor oral health. However, few studies have examined the role of structural racism as a contributor to racial gaps in children's oral health. This study assessed associations between state-level structural racism and oral health outcomes of children and the related Black-White disparities.

Methods: This repeated cross-sectional observational study examined children aged 1 to 17 y in the 2016 to 2021 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). Three outcomes were examined: utilization (dentist visit in past 12 mo), any oral health problem (difficulty in past 12 mo with bleeding gums, cavities, or toothaches), and oral health (teeth in excellent or very good condition). A state-level index was constructed to measure Black-White structural racism composed of 5 dimensions (judicial, educational, economic, political, and neighborhood segregation) and linked to the NSCH. Estimated population-weighted logit regression models were used to assess associations between the outcomes and race and structural racism, adjusting for demographics and socioeconomic status.

Results: The dataset consisted of 98,423 Black (11%) or White (88%) children. Black children had relatively worse outcomes than White children did, with the largest difference observed for the children having teeth in excellent or very good condition (73% vs. 83%). State-level structural racism was not statistically significantly associated with a child receiving dental care, having any oral health problem, or having teeth in excellent or very good condition. US Black-White disparities in these outcomes were unchanged after adjustment for state-level structural racism.

Conclusions: Expanded efforts are needed to address US Black-White disparities in child oral health outcomes. State-level structural racism was not associated with these outcomes. Future research should explore whether findings change when examining these associations at a different geographic level and whether indices of structural racism should explicitly include items specific to health care access and child-specific institutional domains.

Knowledge transfer statement: Black children in this US study had relatively worse oral health and were less likely to have a dental visit than White children were. Structural racism did not explain these disparities, which suggests the need for further research to study mechanisms driving these disparities and how to address them. Policy makers should consider policies that expand where care is delivered, who delivers care, and increase dentists' Medicaid participation, strategies identified previously for reducing disparities.

国家层面的结构性种族主义与儿童牙科保健和口腔健康。
简介:美国黑人儿童的牙科就诊率较低,口腔健康状况不佳的比例较高。然而,很少有研究调查了结构性种族主义在儿童口腔健康方面的种族差距中所起的作用。本研究评估了州一级结构性种族主义与儿童口腔健康结果以及相关的黑人-白人差异之间的关系。方法:本重复横断面观察性研究调查了2016年至2021年全国儿童健康调查(NSCH)中1至17岁的儿童。检查了三个结果:利用(过去12个月的牙医就诊),任何口腔健康问题(过去12个月有牙龈出血、蛀牙或牙痛的困难)和口腔健康(牙齿状况良好或非常好)。本文构建了一个由司法、教育、经济、政治和邻里隔离5个维度组成的州一级黑人-白人结构性种族主义指数,并将其与NSCH联系起来。使用估计的人口加权logit回归模型来评估结果与种族和结构性种族主义之间的关联,并根据人口统计学和社会经济地位进行调整。结果:数据集包括98,423名黑人(11%)或白人(88%)儿童。黑人儿童的结果相对比白人儿童差,在牙齿状况良好或非常好的儿童中观察到的差异最大(73%对83%)。州一级的结构性种族主义与儿童接受牙科护理、有任何口腔健康问题或牙齿状况良好或非常良好没有统计学上的显著关联。在调整了州一级的结构性种族主义后,美国黑人和白人在这些结果上的差异没有改变。结论:需要加大努力来解决美国黑人和白人在儿童口腔健康结果方面的差异。州一级的结构性种族主义与这些结果无关。未来的研究应探讨在不同的地理水平检查这些关联时,结果是否会发生变化,以及结构性种族主义指数是否应明确包括特定于医疗保健获取和儿童特定机构领域的项目。知识转移声明:在这项美国研究中,黑人儿童的口腔健康状况相对较差,比白人儿童更少去看牙医。结构性种族主义并不能解释这些差异,这表明需要进一步研究导致这些差异的机制以及如何解决这些差异。政策制定者应该考虑扩大提供医疗服务的地点,由谁提供医疗服务,增加牙医的医疗补助参与,以及之前确定的减少差距的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
JDR Clinical & Translational Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: JDR Clinical & Translational Research seeks to publish the highest quality research articles on clinical and translational research including all of the dental specialties and implantology. Examples include behavioral sciences, cariology, oral & pharyngeal cancer, disease diagnostics, evidence based health care delivery, human genetics, health services research, periodontal diseases, oral medicine, radiology, and pathology. The JDR Clinical & Translational Research expands on its research content by including high-impact health care and global oral health policy statements and systematic reviews of clinical concepts affecting clinical practice. Unique to the JDR Clinical & Translational Research are advances in clinical and translational medicine articles created to focus on research with an immediate potential to affect clinical therapy outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信