Clinical importance of patient-reported outcome measures in severe asthma: results from U-BIOPRED.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Roy Meys, Frits M E Franssen, Alex J Van 't Hul, Per S Bakke, Massimo Caruso, Barbro Dahlén, Stephen J Fowler, Thomas Geiser, Peter H Howarth, Ildikó Horváth, Norbert Krug, Annelie F Behndig, Florian Singer, Jacek Musial, Dominick E Shaw, Paolo Montuschi, Anke H Maitland-van der Zee, Peter J Sterk, Graham Roberts, Nazanin Z Kermani, Raffaele A Incalzi, Renaud Louis, Lars I Andersson, Scott S Wagers, Sven-Erik Dahlén, Kian Fan Chung, Ian M Adcock, Martijn A Spruit
{"title":"Clinical importance of patient-reported outcome measures in severe asthma: results from U-BIOPRED.","authors":"Roy Meys, Frits M E Franssen, Alex J Van 't Hul, Per S Bakke, Massimo Caruso, Barbro Dahlén, Stephen J Fowler, Thomas Geiser, Peter H Howarth, Ildikó Horváth, Norbert Krug, Annelie F Behndig, Florian Singer, Jacek Musial, Dominick E Shaw, Paolo Montuschi, Anke H Maitland-van der Zee, Peter J Sterk, Graham Roberts, Nazanin Z Kermani, Raffaele A Incalzi, Renaud Louis, Lars I Andersson, Scott S Wagers, Sven-Erik Dahlén, Kian Fan Chung, Ian M Adcock, Martijn A Spruit","doi":"10.1186/s12955-024-02321-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Knowledge about the clinical importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in severe asthma is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether and to what extent asthma exacerbations affect changes in PROMS over time and asthma-specific PROMs can predict exacerbations in adult patients with severe asthma in usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 421 patients with severe asthma (62% female; mean age 51.9 ± 13.4 years; mean FEV<sub>1</sub> 67.5 ± 21.3%pred) from the U-BIOPRED cohort were analyzed. The included PROMs were: Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ5); Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ); Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS); Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS); Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS); Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT20). Participants were assessed at baseline and after 12-18 months of usual care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PROMs showed very weak to weak correlations with clinical characteristics such as age, body mass index, FEV<sub>1</sub>, FeNO and eosinophilic cell count. Patients presenting no exacerbations during follow-up showed a statistically significant improvement in all PROMs (except for MARS), whereas individuals experiencing > 2 exacerbations showed a deterioration. Baseline ACQ5 was a predictor of exacerbations with an AUC of 0.590 (95%CI 0.514-0.666).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The association of PROMs with clinical measures was poor in severe asthmatics. Moreover, PROMs were prone to changes in usual care, with exacerbations playing a key role. PROMs need to be systematically evaluated in severe asthma to improve clinical care based on specific patient's needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"22 1","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02321-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Knowledge about the clinical importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in severe asthma is limited.

Objectives: To assess whether and to what extent asthma exacerbations affect changes in PROMS over time and asthma-specific PROMs can predict exacerbations in adult patients with severe asthma in usual care.

Methods: Data of 421 patients with severe asthma (62% female; mean age 51.9 ± 13.4 years; mean FEV1 67.5 ± 21.3%pred) from the U-BIOPRED cohort were analyzed. The included PROMs were: Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ5); Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ); Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS); Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS); Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS); Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT20). Participants were assessed at baseline and after 12-18 months of usual care.

Results: PROMs showed very weak to weak correlations with clinical characteristics such as age, body mass index, FEV1, FeNO and eosinophilic cell count. Patients presenting no exacerbations during follow-up showed a statistically significant improvement in all PROMs (except for MARS), whereas individuals experiencing > 2 exacerbations showed a deterioration. Baseline ACQ5 was a predictor of exacerbations with an AUC of 0.590 (95%CI 0.514-0.666).

Conclusions: The association of PROMs with clinical measures was poor in severe asthmatics. Moreover, PROMs were prone to changes in usual care, with exacerbations playing a key role. PROMs need to be systematically evaluated in severe asthma to improve clinical care based on specific patient's needs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信