Collin Kramer, Jessica R Page, Jaylene Flint, Mark Flint
{"title":"Using Animal Welfare Framing as an Effective Approach to Communicating Climate Change-A Review.","authors":"Collin Kramer, Jessica R Page, Jaylene Flint, Mark Flint","doi":"10.1002/vms3.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Climate change and its effects continue to threaten the stability of environments worldwide, impacting nearly every species. Although framing is an established technique in climate communication science, little has been done in communicating the climate change effects from an animal welfare perspective.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this article is to present the synthesis of evidence in existing literature on the effects of communicating climate change as an animal welfare issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic approach was taken based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) scoping review guidelines and utilizing a hybridized ProPheT-PICOS Model with modifications. Using search strings, scholarly databases within the Web of Science platform were systematically searched for English-language climate change literature that included animal welfare concepts. Articles were imported into Covidence and inclusion and exclusion criteria were then used to select articles for further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of an initial 4080 studies, only two papers were identified that used animal welfare framing to discuss climate change based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research should attempt to understand and approach framing climate change concerning current understanding by geographic location and culture to close research gaps and mitigate bias in the context of climate change and its effects on animal welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":23543,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Climate change and its effects continue to threaten the stability of environments worldwide, impacting nearly every species. Although framing is an established technique in climate communication science, little has been done in communicating the climate change effects from an animal welfare perspective.
Objectives: The primary objective of this article is to present the synthesis of evidence in existing literature on the effects of communicating climate change as an animal welfare issue.
Methods: A systematic approach was taken based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) scoping review guidelines and utilizing a hybridized ProPheT-PICOS Model with modifications. Using search strings, scholarly databases within the Web of Science platform were systematically searched for English-language climate change literature that included animal welfare concepts. Articles were imported into Covidence and inclusion and exclusion criteria were then used to select articles for further analysis.
Results: Of an initial 4080 studies, only two papers were identified that used animal welfare framing to discuss climate change based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Conclusion: Further research should attempt to understand and approach framing climate change concerning current understanding by geographic location and culture to close research gaps and mitigate bias in the context of climate change and its effects on animal welfare.
气候变化及其影响继续威胁着全球环境的稳定,几乎影响到每一个物种。虽然框架是气候传播科学中的一种既定技术,但从动物福利的角度来传达气候变化的影响却很少。目的:本文的主要目的是综合现有文献中关于将气候变化作为动物福利问题进行宣传的影响的证据。方法:采用基于PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)范围评价指南的系统方法,并利用经过修改的混合ProPheT-PICOS模型。使用搜索字符串,在Web of Science平台的学术数据库中系统地搜索包含动物福利概念的英语气候变化文献。将文章导入covid - ence,然后使用纳入和排除标准选择文章进行进一步分析。结果:在最初的4080项研究中,只有两篇论文根据纳入/排除标准使用动物福利框架来讨论气候变化。结论:在气候变化及其对动物福利的影响的背景下,进一步的研究应该尝试理解和处理气候变化框架,包括当前对地理位置和文化的理解,以缩小研究差距,减轻偏见。
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Medicine and Science is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of veterinary medicine and science. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish interesting and high quality work in both fundamental and clinical veterinary medicine and science.
Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
We aim to be a truly global forum for high-quality research in veterinary medicine and science, and believe that the best research should be published and made widely accessible as quickly as possible. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from a select group of prestigious journals published by Wiley-Blackwell.
Veterinary Medicine and Science is a Wiley Open Access journal, one of a new series of peer-reviewed titles publishing quality research with speed and efficiency. For further information visit the Wiley Open Access website.