Comparative effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in achieving diabetes remission in patients with diabetes-related vascular diseases: A multicentred study.

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1111/cob.12732
Wissam Ghusn, Pearl Ma, Kayla Ikemiya, Marita Salame, Karl Hage, Kamal Abi Mosleh, Andrew C Storm, Michael Kendrick, Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Kelvin Higa, Omar M Ghanem
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in achieving diabetes remission in patients with diabetes-related vascular diseases: A multicentred study.","authors":"Wissam Ghusn, Pearl Ma, Kayla Ikemiya, Marita Salame, Karl Hage, Kamal Abi Mosleh, Andrew C Storm, Michael Kendrick, Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Kelvin Higa, Omar M Ghanem","doi":"10.1111/cob.12732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS), including Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), have proven effective in promoting long-term diabetes remission among patients with type-2 diabetes (T2D). In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effectiveness of RYGB and SG in achieving diabetes remission, specifically among patients with T2D and vascular complications, while accounting for similar baseline diabetes severity. Although various scores predict diabetes remission after bariatric surgery, they do not consider diabetes-related vascular complications, which can influence outcomes even in patients with similar baseline T2D severity. We collected preoperative data on microvascular (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy) and macrovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accidents, peripheral artery disease) to compare the efficacy of RYGB and SG. Among 961 patients analysed, those with vascular complications showed higher remission rates with RYGB (OR: 1.97) compared to SG, despite similar baseline diabetes severity. Notably, RYGB patients with microvascular complications had a significant advantage in achieving T2D remission (OR: 2.95). However, no significant differences in remission were observed in patients with macrovascular complications. These findings suggest that RYGB may be more effective than SG in specific patient populations, particularly those with microvascular complications, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"e12732"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS), including Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), have proven effective in promoting long-term diabetes remission among patients with type-2 diabetes (T2D). In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effectiveness of RYGB and SG in achieving diabetes remission, specifically among patients with T2D and vascular complications, while accounting for similar baseline diabetes severity. Although various scores predict diabetes remission after bariatric surgery, they do not consider diabetes-related vascular complications, which can influence outcomes even in patients with similar baseline T2D severity. We collected preoperative data on microvascular (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy) and macrovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accidents, peripheral artery disease) to compare the efficacy of RYGB and SG. Among 961 patients analysed, those with vascular complications showed higher remission rates with RYGB (OR: 1.97) compared to SG, despite similar baseline diabetes severity. Notably, RYGB patients with microvascular complications had a significant advantage in achieving T2D remission (OR: 2.95). However, no significant differences in remission were observed in patients with macrovascular complications. These findings suggest that RYGB may be more effective than SG in specific patient populations, particularly those with microvascular complications, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies.

Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖式胃切除术在糖尿病相关血管疾病患者中实现糖尿病缓解的比较效果:一项多中心研究
代谢和减肥手术(MBS),包括Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术(RYGB)和袖胃切除术(SG),已被证明对促进2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的长期糖尿病缓解有效。在这项多中心回顾性队列研究中,我们调查了RYGB和SG在实现糖尿病缓解方面的有效性,特别是在有T2D和血管并发症的患者中,同时考虑到相似的基线糖尿病严重程度。尽管各种评分预测了减肥手术后糖尿病的缓解,但它们没有考虑糖尿病相关的血管并发症,即使在基线T2D严重程度相似的患者中,这些并发症也会影响结果。我们收集术前微血管(视网膜病变、肾病、神经病变)和大血管合并症(冠状动脉疾病、脑血管意外、外周动脉疾病)的数据,比较RYGB和SG的疗效。在分析的961例患者中,尽管基线糖尿病严重程度相似,但与SG相比,血管并发症患者的RYGB缓解率更高(OR: 1.97)。值得注意的是,伴有微血管并发症的RYGB患者在实现T2D缓解方面具有显著优势(OR: 2.95)。然而,大血管并发症患者在缓解方面没有显著差异。这些发现表明,RYGB在特定患者群体中可能比SG更有效,特别是那些有微血管并发症的患者,强调了个性化治疗策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信