Health System Purchasing Professionals' Approaches to Considering Equity in Procurement.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016
Katrina E Hauschildt, Taylor Bernstein, Deidra C Crews, Emmanuel F Drabo, Kadija Ferryman, John W Jackson, Thomas S Valley, Joseph Levy, Theodore J Iwashyna
{"title":"Health System Purchasing Professionals' Approaches to Considering Equity in Procurement.","authors":"Katrina E Hauschildt, Taylor Bernstein, Deidra C Crews, Emmanuel F Drabo, Kadija Ferryman, John W Jackson, Thomas S Valley, Joseph Levy, Theodore J Iwashyna","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuing data on racial bias in pulse oximeters and artificial intelligence has sparked calls for health systems to drive innovation against racial bias in healthcare device and artificial intelligence markets by incorporating equity concerns explicitly into purchasing decisions.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do healthcare purchasing professionals integrate equity concerns into purchasing decision-making?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Between 8/2023-3/2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews via videoconferencing with healthcare purchasing professionals about purchasing processes for pulse oximeters and other devices-and whether and where equity concerns arise in decision-making. An abductive approach was used to analyze perspectives on how equity and disparity concerns are currently integrated into healthcare purchasing decision-making. Healthcare purchasing professionals (N=30) worked in varied supply chain roles for various health systems and supply chain support and consulting companies across the US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare purchasing professionals described limited considerations of equity in current purchasing processes. They described some receptivity to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, largely focused on diversifying suppliers, rather than ensuring devices and products functioned equitably. Respondents reported that they depended on clinician partners to raise and delineate requirements for equitable performance. Respondents also depicted current sources of evidence used in making purchasing decisions as providing limited information about equitable performance, and that large contracts, including with group purchasing organizations (GPOs), may limit purchasing options.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Health system purchasing professionals suggested interest and some nascent successes in diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations in health system purchasing processes, including diverse supplier initiatives, but also a need for strong clinical partnership to ensure equitable performance. Explicit approaches for incorporating equitable performance into healthcare purchasing are likely needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuing data on racial bias in pulse oximeters and artificial intelligence has sparked calls for health systems to drive innovation against racial bias in healthcare device and artificial intelligence markets by incorporating equity concerns explicitly into purchasing decisions.

Research question: How do healthcare purchasing professionals integrate equity concerns into purchasing decision-making?

Study design and methods: Between 8/2023-3/2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews via videoconferencing with healthcare purchasing professionals about purchasing processes for pulse oximeters and other devices-and whether and where equity concerns arise in decision-making. An abductive approach was used to analyze perspectives on how equity and disparity concerns are currently integrated into healthcare purchasing decision-making. Healthcare purchasing professionals (N=30) worked in varied supply chain roles for various health systems and supply chain support and consulting companies across the US.

Results: Healthcare purchasing professionals described limited considerations of equity in current purchasing processes. They described some receptivity to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, largely focused on diversifying suppliers, rather than ensuring devices and products functioned equitably. Respondents reported that they depended on clinician partners to raise and delineate requirements for equitable performance. Respondents also depicted current sources of evidence used in making purchasing decisions as providing limited information about equitable performance, and that large contracts, including with group purchasing organizations (GPOs), may limit purchasing options.

Interpretation: Health system purchasing professionals suggested interest and some nascent successes in diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations in health system purchasing processes, including diverse supplier initiatives, but also a need for strong clinical partnership to ensure equitable performance. Explicit approaches for incorporating equitable performance into healthcare purchasing are likely needed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信