Anticholinergic burden and frailty in older inpatients: insights from analysis of admission and discharge medicines using four anticholinergic scales.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Mohammed Adem Mohammed, Amy Hai Yan Chan, Nasir Wabe, Ayesha Ali, Louis Harris, Sianne West, Rhea Colaabavala, Justine Aw, Jeff Harrison
{"title":"Anticholinergic burden and frailty in older inpatients: insights from analysis of admission and discharge medicines using four anticholinergic scales.","authors":"Mohammed Adem Mohammed, Amy Hai Yan Chan, Nasir Wabe, Ayesha Ali, Louis Harris, Sianne West, Rhea Colaabavala, Justine Aw, Jeff Harrison","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05394-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to high anticholinergic burden is associated with adverse outcomes in older adults. Older adults with frailty have greater vulnerability to adverse anticholinergic effects. There is limited data on anticholinergic burden in hospitalised older adults with frailty particularly, in New Zealand. This study aimed to (i) examine exposure to anticholinergic medicines in older inpatients using multiple scales, and (ii) describe the association of patient factors such as frailty with anticholinergic exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed admission and discharge medicines of 222 older patients (≥ 65 years) in a New Zealand hospital. Sociodemographic, diagnostic and medication data were collected from electronic health records. Anticholinergic burden was quantified using the Anticholinergic Burden Classification (ABC), Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and Drug Burden Index (DBI). Frailty was assessed using frailty index (FI) and the Hospital Frailty Risk score (HFRS); higher scores indicate higher frailty. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine patient factors associated with anticholinergic burden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depending on the scale used, the mean anticholinergic burden ranged from 0.65 to 1.83 on admission and 0.59 to 1.40 at discharge, with 32-74% of the patients on admission and 25-65% at discharge prescribed at least one anticholinergic medicine. About 1 in 3 patients had high anticholinergic burden on admission and discharge. On admission, being frail (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.57, 16.97), having history of readmission (AOR 4.96, CI 1.58, 15.59), and higher number of medicines [AOR range 1.18 CI 1.10, 1.26 (ARS scale) to 1.25 CI 1.15, 1.36 (DBI scale)] were associated with higher odds of anticholinergic exposure. At discharge, pre-frail (DBI scale: AOR = 6.58, CI 1.71-25.32) and frail patients (ACB scale: AOR = 5.73, CI 1.66, 19.70) and those with higher number of medicines [AOR range 1.18 CI 1.09, 1.29 (ARS scale) to 1.33 CI 1.20, 1.49 (DBI scale)] had higher odds of anticholinergic exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A reduction in the anticholinergic burden from admission to discharge was observed in the study population yet, one-third of the study cohort were discharged with high anticholinergic medicines. Enhancing hospital prescribers' and pharmacists' awareness about anticholinergic burden and targeted interventions such as in-hospital deprescribing are needed to reduce high anticholinergic exposure in acute setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"1022"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05394-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exposure to high anticholinergic burden is associated with adverse outcomes in older adults. Older adults with frailty have greater vulnerability to adverse anticholinergic effects. There is limited data on anticholinergic burden in hospitalised older adults with frailty particularly, in New Zealand. This study aimed to (i) examine exposure to anticholinergic medicines in older inpatients using multiple scales, and (ii) describe the association of patient factors such as frailty with anticholinergic exposure.

Methods: We reviewed admission and discharge medicines of 222 older patients (≥ 65 years) in a New Zealand hospital. Sociodemographic, diagnostic and medication data were collected from electronic health records. Anticholinergic burden was quantified using the Anticholinergic Burden Classification (ABC), Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and Drug Burden Index (DBI). Frailty was assessed using frailty index (FI) and the Hospital Frailty Risk score (HFRS); higher scores indicate higher frailty. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine patient factors associated with anticholinergic burden.

Results: Depending on the scale used, the mean anticholinergic burden ranged from 0.65 to 1.83 on admission and 0.59 to 1.40 at discharge, with 32-74% of the patients on admission and 25-65% at discharge prescribed at least one anticholinergic medicine. About 1 in 3 patients had high anticholinergic burden on admission and discharge. On admission, being frail (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.57, 16.97), having history of readmission (AOR 4.96, CI 1.58, 15.59), and higher number of medicines [AOR range 1.18 CI 1.10, 1.26 (ARS scale) to 1.25 CI 1.15, 1.36 (DBI scale)] were associated with higher odds of anticholinergic exposure. At discharge, pre-frail (DBI scale: AOR = 6.58, CI 1.71-25.32) and frail patients (ACB scale: AOR = 5.73, CI 1.66, 19.70) and those with higher number of medicines [AOR range 1.18 CI 1.09, 1.29 (ARS scale) to 1.33 CI 1.20, 1.49 (DBI scale)] had higher odds of anticholinergic exposure.

Conclusion: A reduction in the anticholinergic burden from admission to discharge was observed in the study population yet, one-third of the study cohort were discharged with high anticholinergic medicines. Enhancing hospital prescribers' and pharmacists' awareness about anticholinergic burden and targeted interventions such as in-hospital deprescribing are needed to reduce high anticholinergic exposure in acute setting.

老年住院患者抗胆碱能负担与衰弱:来自四种抗胆碱能量表入院和出院药物分析的见解。
背景:暴露于高抗胆碱能负荷与老年人不良结局相关。体弱多病的老年人更容易受到不利的抗胆碱能作用的影响。特别是在新西兰,关于住院的虚弱老年人抗胆碱能负担的数据有限。本研究旨在(i)使用多种量表检查老年住院患者的抗胆碱能药物暴露情况,以及(ii)描述患者因素(如虚弱)与抗胆碱能药物暴露的关系。方法:我们回顾了新西兰某医院222例老年患者(≥65岁)的入院和出院用药。从电子健康记录中收集社会人口、诊断和用药数据。采用抗胆碱能负担分类(ABC)、抗胆碱能认知负担量表(ACB)、抗胆碱能风险量表(ARS)和药物负担指数(DBI)对抗胆碱能负担进行量化。采用虚弱指数(FI)和医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)评估虚弱程度;分数越高表明身体越脆弱。采用多变量logistic回归分析确定与抗胆碱能负荷相关的患者因素。结果:根据使用的量表,平均抗胆碱能负担在入院时为0.65 ~ 1.83,出院时为0.59 ~ 1.40,其中32-74%的患者入院时和25-65%的患者出院时至少服用了一种抗胆碱能药物。约1 / 3的患者在入院和出院时有较高的抗胆碱能负荷。入院时,体弱(调整比值比[AOR] 5.16, 95%可信区间[95% CI] 1.57, 16.97)、有再入院史(AOR 4.96, CI 1.58, 15.59)和较高的药物剂量[AOR范围1.18 CI 1.10, 1.26 (ARS量表)至1.25 CI 1.15, 1.36 (DBI量表)]与较高的抗胆碱能暴露几率相关。出院时,体弱前期(DBI量表:AOR = 6.58, CI 1.71 ~ 25.32)和体弱患者(ACB量表:AOR = 5.73, CI 1.66, 19.70)以及服用较多药物的患者[AOR范围1.18 CI 1.09, 1.29 (ARS量表)至1.33 CI 1.20, 1.49 (DBI量表)]抗胆碱能暴露的几率较高。结论:在研究人群中,从入院到出院的抗胆碱能负担有所减轻,但三分之一的研究队列在出院时使用了高抗胆碱能药物。需要提高医院开处方者和药剂师对抗胆碱能负担的认识,并采取有针对性的干预措施,如院内处方减少,以减少急性环境下的高抗胆碱能暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信