The Psychosocial Hierarchy of Controls: Effectively Reducing Psychosocial Hazards at Work.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Asta Kjærgaard, Emilie Marie Rudolf, Julie Palmqvist, Mikala Ernebjerg Jakobsen, Jeppe Zielinski Nguyen Ajslev
{"title":"The Psychosocial Hierarchy of Controls: Effectively Reducing Psychosocial Hazards at Work.","authors":"Asta Kjærgaard, Emilie Marie Rudolf, Julie Palmqvist, Mikala Ernebjerg Jakobsen, Jeppe Zielinski Nguyen Ajslev","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychosocial hazards in the workplace contribute to mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and musculoskeletal ill-health. The Hierarchy of Controls applied to NIOSH Total Worker Health (TWH HOC) aims to mitigate these hazards through effective interventions. This study proposes a revision of the model resulting in a HOC for psychosocial hazards (P-HOC) and explores its application in improving the working environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed recent literature on organizational and individual interventions to revise the TWH HOC to a psychosocial HOC framework. Subsequently, the modified P-HOC was applied to a qualitative case study of nine Danish companies participating in the Danish \"Agreement to problem-solve\" labor inspection strategy. We analyzed the types of initiatives implemented and gathered qualitative data on employee and management perspectives on their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study led to a revision of the TWH HOC resulting in a P-HOC prioritizing organizational measures with documented effect, and indicating the importance of comprehensive measures. Findings from the qualitative study indicate a predominant contemporary focus on lower-level P-HOC initiatives, such as individual-based approaches and administrative controls. While these interventions show some improvements in mental well-being and work culture, they seem insufficient to enhance the comprehensive psychosocial environment. Companies implementing higher-level interventions experienced greater efficacy, particularly when employing multifaceted approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study emphasizes the need for a more robust application of higher-level measures and multifaceted interventions to better improve the psychosocial working environment. Future research should investigate the P-HOC's varying impact and explore alternative frameworks for better intervention outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial hazards in the workplace contribute to mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and musculoskeletal ill-health. The Hierarchy of Controls applied to NIOSH Total Worker Health (TWH HOC) aims to mitigate these hazards through effective interventions. This study proposes a revision of the model resulting in a HOC for psychosocial hazards (P-HOC) and explores its application in improving the working environment.

Methods: We reviewed recent literature on organizational and individual interventions to revise the TWH HOC to a psychosocial HOC framework. Subsequently, the modified P-HOC was applied to a qualitative case study of nine Danish companies participating in the Danish "Agreement to problem-solve" labor inspection strategy. We analyzed the types of initiatives implemented and gathered qualitative data on employee and management perspectives on their effectiveness.

Results: The study led to a revision of the TWH HOC resulting in a P-HOC prioritizing organizational measures with documented effect, and indicating the importance of comprehensive measures. Findings from the qualitative study indicate a predominant contemporary focus on lower-level P-HOC initiatives, such as individual-based approaches and administrative controls. While these interventions show some improvements in mental well-being and work culture, they seem insufficient to enhance the comprehensive psychosocial environment. Companies implementing higher-level interventions experienced greater efficacy, particularly when employing multifaceted approaches.

Conclusions: The study emphasizes the need for a more robust application of higher-level measures and multifaceted interventions to better improve the psychosocial working environment. Future research should investigate the P-HOC's varying impact and explore alternative frameworks for better intervention outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信