Machine learning for the prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Xiangui Lv, Daiqiang Liu, Xinwei Chen, Lvlin Chen, Xiaohui Wang, Xiaomei Xu, Lin Chen, Chao Huang
{"title":"Machine learning for the prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiangui Lv, Daiqiang Liu, Xinwei Chen, Lvlin Chen, Xiaohui Wang, Xiaomei Xu, Lin Chen, Chao Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12879-024-10380-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting mortality in sepsis-related acute kidney injury facilitates early data-driven treatment decisions. Machine learning is predicting mortality in S-AKI in a growing number of studies. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the predictive value of machine learning for mortality in patients with septic acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched up to 20 July 2024 This was supplemented by a manual search of study references and review articles. Data were analysed using STATA 14.0 software. The risk of bias in the prediction model was assessed using the Predictive Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 studies were included, with a total of 53 predictive models and 17 machine learning algorithms used. Meta-analysis using a random effects model showed that the overall C index in the training set was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84), sensitivity was 0.39 (0.32-0.47), and specificity was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95). The overall C-index in the validation set was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.74), sensitivity was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.48-0.60) and specificity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.91). The results showed that the machine learning algorithms had a good performance in predicting sepsis-related acute kidney injury death prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning has been shown to be an effective tool for predicting sepsis-associated acute kidney injury deaths, which has important implications for enhancing risk assessment and clinical decision-making to improve sepsis patient care. It is also eagerly anticipated that future research efforts will incorporate larger sample sizes and multi-centre studies to more intensively examine the external validation of these models in different patient populations, allowing for a more in-depth exploration of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in terms of accurate diagnostic efficacy across a diverse range of model and predictor types.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024569420).</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"24 1","pages":"1454"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10380-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Predicting mortality in sepsis-related acute kidney injury facilitates early data-driven treatment decisions. Machine learning is predicting mortality in S-AKI in a growing number of studies. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the predictive value of machine learning for mortality in patients with septic acute kidney injury.

Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched up to 20 July 2024 This was supplemented by a manual search of study references and review articles. Data were analysed using STATA 14.0 software. The risk of bias in the prediction model was assessed using the Predictive Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.

Results: A total of 8 studies were included, with a total of 53 predictive models and 17 machine learning algorithms used. Meta-analysis using a random effects model showed that the overall C index in the training set was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84), sensitivity was 0.39 (0.32-0.47), and specificity was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95). The overall C-index in the validation set was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.74), sensitivity was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.48-0.60) and specificity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.91). The results showed that the machine learning algorithms had a good performance in predicting sepsis-related acute kidney injury death prediction.

Conclusion: Machine learning has been shown to be an effective tool for predicting sepsis-associated acute kidney injury deaths, which has important implications for enhancing risk assessment and clinical decision-making to improve sepsis patient care. It is also eagerly anticipated that future research efforts will incorporate larger sample sizes and multi-centre studies to more intensively examine the external validation of these models in different patient populations, allowing for a more in-depth exploration of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in terms of accurate diagnostic efficacy across a diverse range of model and predictor types.

Trial registration: This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024569420).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信