Comparison of urinary excretion patterns among exposures to cosmetic preservative, herbicide, and nootropic stimulant in anti-doping analysis

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
I-Wen Lu , Mei-Chich Hsu , Yu-Tse Wu , William Chih-Wei Chang
{"title":"Comparison of urinary excretion patterns among exposures to cosmetic preservative, herbicide, and nootropic stimulant in anti-doping analysis","authors":"I-Wen Lu ,&nbsp;Mei-Chich Hsu ,&nbsp;Yu-Tse Wu ,&nbsp;William Chih-Wei Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Doping with meclofenoxate, a nootropic stimulant prohibited in-competition by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), is identified through the primary marker of urinary 4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (4-CPA). However, the presence of 4-CPA can also arise from permissible sources. This study ventured into comparing urinary excretion patterns among exposures to permitted chemicals (chlorphenesin and 4-CPA) and the banned stimulant (meclofenoxate) and interpreting the analytical findings according to the reporting requirements. A validated method, utilising direct injection and ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, was employed for urine analysis. In the first experiment, participants applied chlorphenesin-containing cosmetics with varied functions, dosages, frequencies, and application sites. Sunscreen usage led to significantly higher urinary 4-CPA concentrations (up to 1049 ng/mL) as compared to others, highlighting the impact of cosmetic formulation composition for chlorphenesin delivery. The diagnostic marker for preservative exposure included 3-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-hydroxypropanoic acid (4-CPP) and chlorphenesin and its conjugated metabolites, with 4-CPP reaching higher concentrations (C<sub>max</sub> of 903–7629 ng/mL) and for a longer period, up to 7–14 days. In the second experiment involving meclofenoxate supplement administration, urinary C<sub>max</sub> levels of 4-CPA were observed between 36,287 and 39,769 ng/mL at 3–10 h post-dosing, with the parent meclofenoxate undetected in all participants’ samples. The third experiment, focused on occupational herbicide exposure in agricultural environments, detected minimal 4-CPA (&lt; 10 ng/mL) in urine. WADA’s current guidance for meclofenoxate aligns with reporting correct analytical results. Investigations, such as the experimental approach herein, offer valuable evidence addressing accuracy concerns in anti-doping tests, contributing insights for future amendments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":"1251 ","pages":"Article 124430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023224004392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Doping with meclofenoxate, a nootropic stimulant prohibited in-competition by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), is identified through the primary marker of urinary 4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (4-CPA). However, the presence of 4-CPA can also arise from permissible sources. This study ventured into comparing urinary excretion patterns among exposures to permitted chemicals (chlorphenesin and 4-CPA) and the banned stimulant (meclofenoxate) and interpreting the analytical findings according to the reporting requirements. A validated method, utilising direct injection and ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, was employed for urine analysis. In the first experiment, participants applied chlorphenesin-containing cosmetics with varied functions, dosages, frequencies, and application sites. Sunscreen usage led to significantly higher urinary 4-CPA concentrations (up to 1049 ng/mL) as compared to others, highlighting the impact of cosmetic formulation composition for chlorphenesin delivery. The diagnostic marker for preservative exposure included 3-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-hydroxypropanoic acid (4-CPP) and chlorphenesin and its conjugated metabolites, with 4-CPP reaching higher concentrations (Cmax of 903–7629 ng/mL) and for a longer period, up to 7–14 days. In the second experiment involving meclofenoxate supplement administration, urinary Cmax levels of 4-CPA were observed between 36,287 and 39,769 ng/mL at 3–10 h post-dosing, with the parent meclofenoxate undetected in all participants’ samples. The third experiment, focused on occupational herbicide exposure in agricultural environments, detected minimal 4-CPA (< 10 ng/mL) in urine. WADA’s current guidance for meclofenoxate aligns with reporting correct analytical results. Investigations, such as the experimental approach herein, offer valuable evidence addressing accuracy concerns in anti-doping tests, contributing insights for future amendments.
化妆品防腐剂、除草剂和益智兴奋剂在反兴奋剂分析中的尿排泄模式比较。
服用被世界反兴奋剂机构(WADA)禁止在比赛中使用的促智兴奋剂甲氯芬酸是通过尿液4-氯苯氧乙酸(4-CPA)的主要标记物来识别的。然而,4-CPA的存在也可能来自允许的来源。这项研究大胆地比较了暴露于允许的化学物质(氯苯菌素和4-CPA)和禁用的兴奋剂(甲氯虫酸酯)的尿液排泄模式,并根据报告要求解释了分析结果。采用直接进样和超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法对尿液进行分析。在第一个实验中,参与者使用不同功能、剂量、频率和涂抹部位的含氯苯树脂化妆品。与其他防晒霜相比,防晒霜的使用导致尿中4-CPA浓度显著升高(高达1049 ng/mL),突出了化妆品配方成分对氯苯菌素输送的影响。3-(4-氯苯氧基)-2-羟基丙酸(4-CPP)和氯苯素及其结合代谢物是防腐剂暴露的诊断标志物,其中4-CPP浓度较高(Cmax为903 ~ 7629 ng/mL),暴露时间较长,可达7 ~ 14天。在第二个实验中,在给药后3-10小时,观察到尿中4-CPA的Cmax水平在36,287至39,769 ng/mL之间,所有参与者的样本中均未检测到母体甲氯芬oxate。第三个实验的重点是农业环境中的职业除草剂暴露,在尿液中检测到最小的4-CPA (< 10 ng/mL)。世界反兴奋剂机构目前对氯氟虫酸盐的指导与报告正确的分析结果一致。调查,如本文中的实验方法,提供了解决反兴奋剂测试准确性问题的宝贵证据,为未来的修订提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography B
Journal of Chromatography B 医学-分析化学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
306
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis. Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches. Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信