Ancient Skeletons In Situ: Evaluating Bone Diagenesis at an Open-Air Archaeological Site and Community Museum in Central Thailand

IF 3.2 1区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Gina Palefsky, Thanik Lertcharnrit, Robin B. Trayler, Lauren E. Lopes, Sora L. Kim
{"title":"Ancient Skeletons In Situ: Evaluating Bone Diagenesis at an Open-Air Archaeological Site and Community Museum in Central Thailand","authors":"Gina Palefsky, Thanik Lertcharnrit, Robin B. Trayler, Lauren E. Lopes, Sora L. Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10816-024-09684-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Archaeological human skeletal remains are displayed in many museums across Thailand, under glass in exhibit halls, and as part of open-air displays where skeletons are partially excavated but remain <i>in situ.</i> This form of outdoor exhibit is a notable component of public archaeology initiatives and local educational outreach, but the potential long-term implications for bone preservation have raised concerns. This study investigated patterns of diagenesis at the Ban Pong Manao Archaeological Site and Community Museum in Lopburi Province, central Thailand, where some ancient skeletons are curated indoors in the on-site antiquities archive, and others are displayed outdoors in covered open-air excavation units. We applied a biogeochemical approach to investigate diagenesis, using methods from stable isotope analysis and Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy to assess post-excavation taphonomic processes. Results from this study revealed no statistically significant differences in values for bone collagen or bioapatite preservation indices between <i>in situ</i> and curated skeletons. However, we observed lower collagen yields and higher bioapatite carbonate yields among <i>in situ</i> skeletons that suggested processes of diagenesis may be accelerated by partial exposure in open-air display contexts. After roughly 20 years, differences between post-excavation contexts are not yet substantial but over time may increase if current taphonomic trajectories are maintained. We consider the implications and limitations of these results and examine partial excavation and exposure as simultaneously deleterious and additive in the context of cultural heritage management in Thailand.</p>","PeriodicalId":47725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-024-09684-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Archaeological human skeletal remains are displayed in many museums across Thailand, under glass in exhibit halls, and as part of open-air displays where skeletons are partially excavated but remain in situ. This form of outdoor exhibit is a notable component of public archaeology initiatives and local educational outreach, but the potential long-term implications for bone preservation have raised concerns. This study investigated patterns of diagenesis at the Ban Pong Manao Archaeological Site and Community Museum in Lopburi Province, central Thailand, where some ancient skeletons are curated indoors in the on-site antiquities archive, and others are displayed outdoors in covered open-air excavation units. We applied a biogeochemical approach to investigate diagenesis, using methods from stable isotope analysis and Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy to assess post-excavation taphonomic processes. Results from this study revealed no statistically significant differences in values for bone collagen or bioapatite preservation indices between in situ and curated skeletons. However, we observed lower collagen yields and higher bioapatite carbonate yields among in situ skeletons that suggested processes of diagenesis may be accelerated by partial exposure in open-air display contexts. After roughly 20 years, differences between post-excavation contexts are not yet substantial but over time may increase if current taphonomic trajectories are maintained. We consider the implications and limitations of these results and examine partial excavation and exposure as simultaneously deleterious and additive in the context of cultural heritage management in Thailand.

古代骨骼在现场:评估骨成岩在一个露天考古遗址和社区博物馆在泰国中部
考古人类骨骼遗骸在泰国各地的许多博物馆展出,在展厅的玻璃下,作为露天展览的一部分,骨骼部分被挖掘出来,但仍留在原地。这种形式的户外展览是公共考古倡议和当地教育推广的重要组成部分,但对骨骼保存的潜在长期影响引起了人们的关注。本研究调查了位于泰国中部华武里省的Ban Pong Manao考古遗址和社区博物馆的成岩作用模式,其中一些古代骨骼被陈列在室内的现场文物档案馆中,而另一些则被陈列在室外有盖的露天挖掘单元中。我们采用生物地球化学方法研究成岩作用,使用稳定同位素分析和傅里叶变换红外光谱方法来评估挖掘后的埋藏过程。本研究结果显示,骨胶原蛋白或生物磷灰石保存指数在原位和策展骨骼之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,我们观察到原位骨骼中胶原蛋白产量较低,生物磷灰石碳酸盐产量较高,这表明部分暴露在露天展示环境中可能会加速成岩过程。大约20年后,挖掘后环境之间的差异还不是很大,但随着时间的推移,如果保持目前的地貌学轨迹,差异可能会增加。我们考虑这些结果的影响和局限性,并在泰国文化遗产管理的背景下检查部分挖掘和暴露同时有害和附加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, the leading journal in its field,  presents original articles that address method- or theory-focused issues of current archaeological interest and represent significant explorations on the cutting edge of the discipline.   The journal also welcomes topical syntheses that critically assess and integrate research on a specific subject in archaeological method or theory, as well as examinations of the history of archaeology.    Written by experts, the articles benefit an international audience of archaeologists, students of archaeology, and practitioners of closely related disciplines.  Specific topics covered in recent issues include:  the use of nitche construction theory in archaeology,  new developments in the use of soil chemistry in archaeological interpretation, and a model for the prehistoric development of clothing.  The Journal''s distinguished Editorial Board includes archaeologists with worldwide archaeological knowledge (the Americas, Asia and the Pacific, Europe, and Africa), and expertise in a wide range of methodological and theoretical issues.  Rated ''A'' in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH) Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory is rated ''A'' in the ERIH, a new reference index that aims to help evenly access the scientific quality of Humanities research output. For more information visit: http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/activities/research-infrastructures.html Rated ''A'' in the Australian Research Council Humanities and Creative Arts Journal List.  For more information, visit: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/journal_list_dev.htm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信