Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block in pediatric inguinal hernia surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ling Zhang, Zhina Liu, Jifeng Guo, Hongquan Jin, Zhimin Zhang
{"title":"Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block in pediatric inguinal hernia surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Ling Zhang, Zhina Liu, Jifeng Guo, Hongquan Jin, Zhimin Zhang","doi":"10.11152/mu-4448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block (IIHB) in children undergoing surgery for inguinal hernias.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to January 4, 2024. For continuous data, the effect sizes were presented as weighted mean differences (WMDs), and for categorical data, they were reported as relative ratios (RR), each accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IIHB demonstrated a longer duration before the need for the first analgesic compared to transverse abdominis plane (TAP), caudal epidural block (CEB), and pre-incisional wound infiltration (PWI), but a shorter duration than quadratus lumborum block (QLB). The IIHB group had a higher probability of requiring rescue analgesics compared to other blocks or PWI (RR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.28, p=0.001). Higher FLACC scores were noted at 12 hours for the IIHB group (WMD:0.50, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.86, p=0.008). IIHB required more intraoperative fentanyl compared to controls (RR: 2.14, 95% CI:1.17 to 3.92, p=0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While IIHB may have some benefits, it does not appear to be more effective overall in managing postoperative pain in pediatric inguinal hernia surgery patients compared to other blocks or PWI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94138,"journal":{"name":"Medical ultrasonography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block (IIHB) in children undergoing surgery for inguinal hernias.

Material and methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to January 4, 2024. For continuous data, the effect sizes were presented as weighted mean differences (WMDs), and for categorical data, they were reported as relative ratios (RR), each accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: IIHB demonstrated a longer duration before the need for the first analgesic compared to transverse abdominis plane (TAP), caudal epidural block (CEB), and pre-incisional wound infiltration (PWI), but a shorter duration than quadratus lumborum block (QLB). The IIHB group had a higher probability of requiring rescue analgesics compared to other blocks or PWI (RR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.28, p=0.001). Higher FLACC scores were noted at 12 hours for the IIHB group (WMD:0.50, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.86, p=0.008). IIHB required more intraoperative fentanyl compared to controls (RR: 2.14, 95% CI:1.17 to 3.92, p=0.014).

Conclusion: While IIHB may have some benefits, it does not appear to be more effective overall in managing postoperative pain in pediatric inguinal hernia surgery patients compared to other blocks or PWI.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信