Strength, Rate of Force Development, and Force Control Evaluations to Quantify Upper-Limbs Asymmetries Agreement in Professional Male Volleyball Players.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Samuel D'Emanuele, Gennaro Boccia, Veronica Zardo, Valter Durigon, Federico Schena, Cantor Tarperi
{"title":"Strength, Rate of Force Development, and Force Control Evaluations to Quantify Upper-Limbs Asymmetries Agreement in Professional Male Volleyball Players.","authors":"Samuel D'Emanuele, Gennaro Boccia, Veronica Zardo, Valter Durigon, Federico Schena, Cantor Tarperi","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>D'Emanuele, S, Boccia, G, Zardo, V, Durigon, V, Schena, F, and Tarperi, C. Strength, rate of force development, and force control evaluations to quantify upper-limbs asymmetries agreement in professional male volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res 39(4): 466-473, 2025-Asymmetries are known to vary based on the nature of the sport and differ between individuals and the tests used. We explored interlimb asymmetries in muscle function among 13 national-level male volleyball players (24 ± 3 years; 87 ± 7 kg; 194 ± 7 cm; 19 ± 2 hours training/week), aiming to determine whether these asymmetries are muscle specific and consistent across various metrics. Subjects underwent assessments for elbow extensors and flexors in both limbs, including maximal contractions to assess the maximal voluntary force (MVF), submaximal ballistic contractions measuring Rate of Force Development (RFD peak ), Scaling Factor (RFD-SF), and evaluations of Approximate Entropy (ApEn), Coefficient of Variations, and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFAα) during sustained contractions. Repeated-mixed ANOVA within and between-factors assessed each metric's differences between muscle groups and limbs. Kappa coefficients (K) were calculated to determine the levels of agreement for the direction of asymmetry among muscle groups and different metrics at the individual level. Our findings revealed that asymmetries were muscle specific, with statistical significance observed only in flexors MVF (12%, p = 0.007, d = 0.68). The asymmetry direction agreement between metrics was null for all parameters except for MVF, which resulted in slight ( K = 0.022) and fair ( K = 0.308) for ApEn. The agreement between RFD peak vs MVF ( K = 0.386) was fair, slight between RFD peak vs RFD-SF ( K = 0.141), and null when comparing RFD peak with ApEn and DFAα. At the individual level, no consistent performance advantage was found for either limb, despite volleyball's partial asymmetrical nature, emphasizing the importance of creating personalized training based on the muscle/limb of interest and the parameter to be improved (i.e., maximum strength or RFD).</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"466-473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: D'Emanuele, S, Boccia, G, Zardo, V, Durigon, V, Schena, F, and Tarperi, C. Strength, rate of force development, and force control evaluations to quantify upper-limbs asymmetries agreement in professional male volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res 39(4): 466-473, 2025-Asymmetries are known to vary based on the nature of the sport and differ between individuals and the tests used. We explored interlimb asymmetries in muscle function among 13 national-level male volleyball players (24 ± 3 years; 87 ± 7 kg; 194 ± 7 cm; 19 ± 2 hours training/week), aiming to determine whether these asymmetries are muscle specific and consistent across various metrics. Subjects underwent assessments for elbow extensors and flexors in both limbs, including maximal contractions to assess the maximal voluntary force (MVF), submaximal ballistic contractions measuring Rate of Force Development (RFD peak ), Scaling Factor (RFD-SF), and evaluations of Approximate Entropy (ApEn), Coefficient of Variations, and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFAα) during sustained contractions. Repeated-mixed ANOVA within and between-factors assessed each metric's differences between muscle groups and limbs. Kappa coefficients (K) were calculated to determine the levels of agreement for the direction of asymmetry among muscle groups and different metrics at the individual level. Our findings revealed that asymmetries were muscle specific, with statistical significance observed only in flexors MVF (12%, p = 0.007, d = 0.68). The asymmetry direction agreement between metrics was null for all parameters except for MVF, which resulted in slight ( K = 0.022) and fair ( K = 0.308) for ApEn. The agreement between RFD peak vs MVF ( K = 0.386) was fair, slight between RFD peak vs RFD-SF ( K = 0.141), and null when comparing RFD peak with ApEn and DFAα. At the individual level, no consistent performance advantage was found for either limb, despite volleyball's partial asymmetrical nature, emphasizing the importance of creating personalized training based on the muscle/limb of interest and the parameter to be improved (i.e., maximum strength or RFD).

力量,力量发展速度和力量控制评估量化上肢不对称协议在职业男子排球运动员。
摘要:D'Emanuele, S, Boccia, G, Zardo, V, Durigon, V, Schena, F和Tarperi, C.力量、力量发展速度和力量控制评估量化职业男子排球运动员上肢不对称一致性。[J]强度测试XX(X): 000- 000,2024 -不对称性因运动的性质而异,因个人和所使用的测试而异。本文对13名国家级男子排球运动员(24±3岁;87±7kg;194±7cm;19±2小时训练/周),旨在确定这些不对称是否是肌肉特有的,并且在各种指标中是一致的。受试者接受了双肢肘关节伸屈肌的评估,包括评估最大自主力(MVF)的最大收缩,测量力发展率(RFDpeak)、比例因子(RFD-SF)的次最大弹道收缩,以及评估持续收缩时的近似熵(ApEn)、变异系数和非趋势波动分析(DFAα)。因素内部和因素之间的重复混合方差分析评估了肌肉群和肢体之间每个指标的差异。计算Kappa系数(K)来确定肌肉群之间不对称方向的一致程度和个体水平上不同指标的一致程度。我们的研究结果显示,不对称是肌肉特有的,只有屈肌MVF有统计学意义(12%,p = 0.007, d = 0.68)。除MVF外,所有参数之间的不对称方向一致为零,导致ApEn轻微(K = 0.022)和公平(K = 0.308)。RFDpeak与MVF之间的一致性(K = 0.386)尚可,RFDpeak与RFD-SF之间的一致性较弱(K = 0.141), RFDpeak与ApEn和DFAα之间的一致性为零。在个人水平上,尽管排球的部分不对称性质,但没有发现任何肢体都有一致的表现优势,这强调了基于感兴趣的肌肉/肢体和需要改进的参数(即最大力量或RFD)创建个性化训练的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信