Sensitivity of the Load-Velocity Relationship Variables to Discriminate the Level of Fatigue Induced by Multiple Sets of the Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift Exercise.
Deniz Şentürk, Zeki Akyildiz, Danica Janicijevic, Amador García-Ramos
{"title":"Sensitivity of the Load-Velocity Relationship Variables to Discriminate the Level of Fatigue Induced by Multiple Sets of the Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift Exercise.","authors":"Deniz Şentürk, Zeki Akyildiz, Danica Janicijevic, Amador García-Ramos","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Şentürk, D, Akyildiz, Z, Janicijevic, D, and García-Ramos, A. Sensitivity of the load-velocity relationship variables to discriminate the level of fatigue induced by multiple sets of the hexagonal barbell deadlift exercise. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study aimed to evaluate changes in load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables (L0, v0, and Aline) after different fatigue protocols and to determine their correlation with changes in 1 repetition maximum (1RM). After determining the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) 1RM, 27 resistance-trained men randomly completed 3 sessions that only differed in the activity performed between 2 incremental loading tests that were performed at the beginning (presession) and end (postsession) of the session: (a) control protocol: no training; (b) moderate-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the HBD exercise at 70% 1RM performing half the maximum possible number of repetitions; and (c) high-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the HBD exercise performed to failure against the 70% 1RM. Significance was set at an alpha level of 0.05. The reduction of 1RM (p < 0.001), v0 (p = 0.014), and Aline (p < 0.001) at postsession was greater for the high-fatigue protocol, followed by the moderate-fatigue protocol, and finally the control protocol. The changes in L0 did not differ between the fatigue protocols (p = 0.372). The percent change in the 1RM at postsession was significantly correlated with the percent change in Aline (r = 0.714) and L0 (r = 0.540), but not with the percent changes in v0 (r = 0.177). These results suggest that the L-V relationship variables offer a highly sensitive and practical solution for fatigue monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Şentürk, D, Akyildiz, Z, Janicijevic, D, and García-Ramos, A. Sensitivity of the load-velocity relationship variables to discriminate the level of fatigue induced by multiple sets of the hexagonal barbell deadlift exercise. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study aimed to evaluate changes in load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables (L0, v0, and Aline) after different fatigue protocols and to determine their correlation with changes in 1 repetition maximum (1RM). After determining the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) 1RM, 27 resistance-trained men randomly completed 3 sessions that only differed in the activity performed between 2 incremental loading tests that were performed at the beginning (presession) and end (postsession) of the session: (a) control protocol: no training; (b) moderate-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the HBD exercise at 70% 1RM performing half the maximum possible number of repetitions; and (c) high-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the HBD exercise performed to failure against the 70% 1RM. Significance was set at an alpha level of 0.05. The reduction of 1RM (p < 0.001), v0 (p = 0.014), and Aline (p < 0.001) at postsession was greater for the high-fatigue protocol, followed by the moderate-fatigue protocol, and finally the control protocol. The changes in L0 did not differ between the fatigue protocols (p = 0.372). The percent change in the 1RM at postsession was significantly correlated with the percent change in Aline (r = 0.714) and L0 (r = 0.540), but not with the percent changes in v0 (r = 0.177). These results suggest that the L-V relationship variables offer a highly sensitive and practical solution for fatigue monitoring.
期刊介绍:
The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.