European recommendations from healthcare professionals and people living with obesity on safe practice for bariatric and metabolic surgery medical tourism: a modified Delphi consensus statement from EASO, IFSO-EC, and ECPO.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Laurence J Dobbie, Susie Birney, Cathy Breen, Sheree Bryant, Ken Clare, Andreea Ciudin, Daniel M Felsenreich, Jason C G Halford, Helen Heneghan, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Vicki Mooney, Chetan Parmar, Jean O'Connell, Grace O'Malley, Euan Woodward, Volkan D Yumuk, Ralph Peterli, Barbara McGowan
{"title":"European recommendations from healthcare professionals and people living with obesity on safe practice for bariatric and metabolic surgery medical tourism: a modified Delphi consensus statement from EASO, IFSO-EC, and ECPO.","authors":"Laurence J Dobbie, Susie Birney, Cathy Breen, Sheree Bryant, Ken Clare, Andreea Ciudin, Daniel M Felsenreich, Jason C G Halford, Helen Heneghan, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Vicki Mooney, Chetan Parmar, Jean O'Connell, Grace O'Malley, Euan Woodward, Volkan D Yumuk, Ralph Peterli, Barbara McGowan","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bariatric and metabolic surgery tourism (BMT) is becoming an increasingly popular route to treatment for patients living with obesity. Recent reports have highlighted that some patients travelling abroad for bariatric surgery have received inadequate care, fraudulent care, and, tragically, some cases have resulted in death. This study aimed to define consensus in Europe regarding safe practices concerning BMT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>IFSO-EC, EASO and ECPO initiated a task force to delineate safe practices in BMT. Two expert European panels were convened, one comprised of healthcare professionals (identified from EASO and IFSO-EC) and the other of patient representatives (identified from ECPO). The study utilized a modified Delphi consensus methodology, and 135 questions were administered. Surveys were conducted anonymously online, and consensus was defined as 70% agreement. Themes analyzed regarding BMT included regulation, pre-operative evaluation, operative care, post-operative care, advertising and online information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and nineteen healthcare professionals and 88 patient representatives participated from 26 countries. The healthcare professional panel included 66 bariatric surgeons, 28 endocrinologists, 18 dietitians, three nurses, two psychologists, one general practitioner and one gastroenterologist. Three questionnaire rounds were conducted for the healthcare professional panel, and two were performed for the patient representative panel. Consensus recommendations were given across all themes relevant to BMT. These included evaluating and managing psychological health, sleep apnea, cardiovascular disease, liver health and dietetic assessment. The recommendations covered the requirements for regulatory standards, including surgeon accreditation and procedural volume. They also included recommendations regarding patient education, standardized operative care, online information provision, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through collaboration with healthcare professionals and patients living with obesity, we provide European recommendations regarding safe practices concerning BMT. Further evaluation is required regarding outcomes following BMT. These data, alongside the Delphi consensus recommendations, will inform BMT clinical guideline development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1711-1723"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bariatric and metabolic surgery tourism (BMT) is becoming an increasingly popular route to treatment for patients living with obesity. Recent reports have highlighted that some patients travelling abroad for bariatric surgery have received inadequate care, fraudulent care, and, tragically, some cases have resulted in death. This study aimed to define consensus in Europe regarding safe practices concerning BMT.

Materials and methods: IFSO-EC, EASO and ECPO initiated a task force to delineate safe practices in BMT. Two expert European panels were convened, one comprised of healthcare professionals (identified from EASO and IFSO-EC) and the other of patient representatives (identified from ECPO). The study utilized a modified Delphi consensus methodology, and 135 questions were administered. Surveys were conducted anonymously online, and consensus was defined as 70% agreement. Themes analyzed regarding BMT included regulation, pre-operative evaluation, operative care, post-operative care, advertising and online information.

Results: One hundred and nineteen healthcare professionals and 88 patient representatives participated from 26 countries. The healthcare professional panel included 66 bariatric surgeons, 28 endocrinologists, 18 dietitians, three nurses, two psychologists, one general practitioner and one gastroenterologist. Three questionnaire rounds were conducted for the healthcare professional panel, and two were performed for the patient representative panel. Consensus recommendations were given across all themes relevant to BMT. These included evaluating and managing psychological health, sleep apnea, cardiovascular disease, liver health and dietetic assessment. The recommendations covered the requirements for regulatory standards, including surgeon accreditation and procedural volume. They also included recommendations regarding patient education, standardized operative care, online information provision, and follow-up.

Conclusions: Through collaboration with healthcare professionals and patients living with obesity, we provide European recommendations regarding safe practices concerning BMT. Further evaluation is required regarding outcomes following BMT. These data, alongside the Delphi consensus recommendations, will inform BMT clinical guideline development.

欧洲卫生保健专业人员和肥胖人群关于减肥和代谢手术医疗旅游安全实践的建议:EASO、IFSO-EC和ECPO修改的德尔菲共识声明。
背景:减肥和代谢手术旅游(BMT)正成为肥胖症患者日益流行的治疗途径。最近的报告强调指出,一些到国外接受减肥手术的病人得到的护理不充分、护理不当,而且,不幸的是,一些病例导致死亡。本研究旨在确定欧洲关于BMT安全实践的共识。材料和方法:IFSO-EC、EASO和ECPO发起了一个工作组来描述BMT的安全实践。召集了两个欧洲专家小组,一个由卫生保健专业人员(来自EASO和IFSO-EC)组成,另一个由患者代表(来自ECPO)组成。该研究采用了改进的德尔菲共识方法,共回答了135个问题。调查在网上匿名进行,共识被定义为70%的同意。分析的主题包括BMT法规、术前评价、手术护理、术后护理、广告和在线信息。结果:来自26个国家的119名医疗保健专业人员和88名患者代表参与了调查。医疗专家小组包括66名减肥外科医生、28名内分泌学家、18名营养师、3名护士、2名心理学家、1名全科医生和1名胃肠病学家。对医疗保健专业人员小组进行了三轮问卷调查,对患者代表小组进行了两轮问卷调查。就与BMT相关的所有主题提出了共识性建议。其中包括评估和管理心理健康、睡眠呼吸暂停、心血管疾病、肝脏健康和饮食评估。这些建议涵盖了监管标准的要求,包括外科医生认证和手术量。它们还包括关于患者教育、标准化手术护理、在线信息提供和随访的建议。结论:通过与医疗保健专业人员和肥胖患者的合作,我们提供了有关BMT安全实践的欧洲建议。需要对BMT后的结果进行进一步评估。这些数据与德尔菲共识建议一起,将为BMT临床指南的制定提供信息。图形化的简介:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信