Mustafa Demir, Aslihan Semiz-Oysu, Eda Ozsezen, Yunus Yasar
{"title":"Nonstenotic carotid artery plaques on computed tomography angiography in embolic stroke of undetermined source.","authors":"Mustafa Demir, Aslihan Semiz-Oysu, Eda Ozsezen, Yunus Yasar","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate the role of <50% stenotic cervical carotid artery plaques in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), focusing on plaque characteristics in symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid arteries (contralateral). In this cross-sectional observational study, 81 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for ESUS and underwent were retrospectively analyzed. Carotid plaques causing <50% stenosis were examined, noting features such as plaque thickness, degree of luminal stenosis, irregularity, ulceration, calcification, and hypodensity. These characteristics were compared between the ipsilateral and contralateral carotid arteries. The study involved 33 men and 48 women, with plaques ≥3mm thick significantly more common in the ipsilateral carotid arteries (P < .05). Notable features such as plaque ulceration, irregularity, noncalcified plaque, and hypodensity were significantly more frequent ipsilaterally (P < .05). Of the plaque patients, 54.3% (44/81) were on the ipsilateral side, compared to 29.6% (24/81) on the contralateral side (P = .0024). Our findings underscore the potential significance of non-stenotic carotid plaques in ESUS. These plaques, especially those with certain high-risk characteristics, are more prevalent ipsilaterally and should be considered in clinical evaluations and treatment of ESUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 51","pages":"e40880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040880","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the role of <50% stenotic cervical carotid artery plaques in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), focusing on plaque characteristics in symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid arteries (contralateral). In this cross-sectional observational study, 81 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for ESUS and underwent were retrospectively analyzed. Carotid plaques causing <50% stenosis were examined, noting features such as plaque thickness, degree of luminal stenosis, irregularity, ulceration, calcification, and hypodensity. These characteristics were compared between the ipsilateral and contralateral carotid arteries. The study involved 33 men and 48 women, with plaques ≥3mm thick significantly more common in the ipsilateral carotid arteries (P < .05). Notable features such as plaque ulceration, irregularity, noncalcified plaque, and hypodensity were significantly more frequent ipsilaterally (P < .05). Of the plaque patients, 54.3% (44/81) were on the ipsilateral side, compared to 29.6% (24/81) on the contralateral side (P = .0024). Our findings underscore the potential significance of non-stenotic carotid plaques in ESUS. These plaques, especially those with certain high-risk characteristics, are more prevalent ipsilaterally and should be considered in clinical evaluations and treatment of ESUS.
期刊介绍:
Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties.
As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.